Literature DB >> 15289126

Indocyanine green-assisted internal limiting membrane removal in epiretinal membrane surgery: a clinical and histologic study.

Alvin K H Kwok1, Timothy Y Y Lai, Winnie W Y Li, Donald C F Woo, Nongnart R Chan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical outcome and quantify histologically the amount of microscopic internal limiting membrane (ILM) and epiretinal membrane (ERM) present in ILM and ERM specimens obtained from ERM surgery.
DESIGN: Interventional consecutive case series.
METHODS: Patients scheduled for ERM surgery were recruited prospectively. Pars plana vitrectomy, removal of ERM, and ILM peeling with indocyanine green (ICG) staining were performed in all patients. Epiretinal membrane and ILM specimens were sent for histologic examination. The amount of ERM present in ILM specimens and the amount of ILM present in ERM specimens were quantified by manual counting. Outcome measures include change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), proportion of cases with 2 or more lines of visual improvement, anatomic outcome, proportions of microscopic ERM within ILM, and microscopic ILM within ERM.
RESULTS: Eighteen eyes in 18 patients were operated with a mean follow-up of 19.3 months. There were 13 primary ERMs and five secondary ERMs. The mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.83 preoperatively to 0.49 postoperatively (P <.001). The mean lines of improvement in BCVA was 3.3 lines with 14 patients (77.8%) who had 2 or more lines of BCVA improvement. Histologic evaluation of the specimens showed no significant correlation with the final BCVA of 20/50 or better. Eleven (61.1%) of the ILM specimens showed various amount of microscopic ERM and 16 (88.9%) of the ERM specimens showed various amount of ILM fragments. The mean proportion of ERM within ILM specimens was 4.69% and that of ILM within ERM specimens was 51.5%. No significant recurrence of ERM was found.
CONCLUSION: Recurrence of ERM may be minimized by removing residual microscopic ERM present on the ILM. Indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling in ERM surgery appears to have favorable visual and anatomic outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15289126     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajo.2004.03.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  25 in total

1.  Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: a comparative study.

Authors:  Ji Woong Lee; In Taek Kim
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Vitrectomy and gas tamponade without internal limiting membrane peeling for myopic foveoschisis.

Authors:  A K H Kwok; T Y Y Lai; W W K Yip
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Retinal outer layer thickness increases after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane, and visual improvement positively correlates with photoreceptor outer segment length.

Authors:  Yuki Hashimoto; Wataru Saito; Michiyuki Saito; Kiriko Hirooka; Akio Fujiya; Chikako Yoshizawa; Kousuke Noda; Susumu Ishida
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Clinical and histological features of epiretinal membrane after diabetic vitrectomy.

Authors:  Yung-Ray Hsu; Chung-May Yang; Po-Ting Yeh
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Surgical results of idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Kyung Tae Kang; Kwang Soo Kim; Yu Cheol Kim
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 6.  [Statement of the Professional Association of German Ophthalmologists (BVA), the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) and the Retinological Society (RG) on the development, diagnostics and treatment of epiretinal gliosis : Status October 2020].

Authors: 
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.059

7.  Reflectivity and thickness analysis of epiretinal membranes using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Ajay E Kuriyan; Delia Cabrera DeBuc; William E Smiddy
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

8.  20 g PPV with indocyanine green-assisted ILM peeling versus 23 g PPV with brilliant blue G-assisted ILM peeling for epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Kleanthis Manousaridis; Silvia Peter; Stefan Mennel
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-10-23       Impact factor: 2.031

9.  Indocyanine green-assisted epiretinal membrane peeling evaluated by optical coherence tomography and multifocal electroretinography.

Authors:  Chryssanthi N Koutsandrea; Michael N Apostolopoulos; Dimitrios A Alonistiotis; Marilita M Moschos; Efstratia Georgiadou; Theodora E Kyriaki; Gerasimos T Georgopoulos; Michael N Moschos
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-12

10.  Assessment of macular function by multifocal electroretinography following epiretinal membrane surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Ji Won Lim; Joon Hee Cho; Ha Kyoung Kim
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.