J Corbin Norton1, Mohamed K Soliman2, Yit C Yang3, Shree Kurup4, Ahmed B Sallam5. 1. Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University, Assiut, Egypt. 3. Wolverhampton Eye Infirmary, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, New Cross, Wolverhampton, UK. 4. Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University Hospitals Eye Institute, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA. 5. Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham St, Little Rock, AR, 72205, USA. ahmedsallam11@yahoo.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes, incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and rate of repeat epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery following phacovitrectomy for primary and secondary ERM. METHODS: Retrospective review of 178,856 cataract surgeries from 2003 to 2015. Eyes that underwent cataract surgery combined with ERM peel were included (n = 708). Eyes were divided into primary (n = 538) and secondary (n = 170) ERM groups. Patient demographics, visual acuity (VA), and postoperative CME were recorded. RESULTS: Patients with secondary ERM had worse preoperative VA, 0.9 ± 0.6 logMAR (20/160 Snellen equivalent) as compared to patients with primary ERM, 0.6 ± 0.3 (20/80), respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the secondary and primary ERM groups in postoperative vision (0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR vs. 0.5 ± 0.3; p = 0.9962) or proportion with VA ≥ 20/40 (46.4% vs. 43.1%; p = 0.6744) at 12-24 weeks. Postoperative CME was twice as likely in the secondary ERM group (16.5%) compared to the primary ERM group (7.8%) (p = 0.0018). There was no difference in the rate of repeat ERM surgery between the secondary ERM group (1.8%) and the primary ERM group (1.5%) (p = 0.7308). CONCLUSION: Eyes with secondary ERM had significant postoperative improvement in VA. They had worse preoperative VA and had a twofold increase in postoperative CME than primary ERM.
PURPOSE: To compare visual outcomes, incidence of cystoid macular edema (CME), and rate of repeat epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery following phacovitrectomy for primary and secondary ERM. METHODS: Retrospective review of 178,856 cataract surgeries from 2003 to 2015. Eyes that underwent cataract surgery combined with ERM peel were included (n = 708). Eyes were divided into primary (n = 538) and secondary (n = 170) ERM groups. Patient demographics, visual acuity (VA), and postoperative CME were recorded. RESULTS: Patients with secondary ERM had worse preoperative VA, 0.9 ± 0.6 logMAR (20/160 Snellen equivalent) as compared to patients with primary ERM, 0.6 ± 0.3 (20/80), respectively (p < 0.0001). There was no difference between the secondary and primary ERM groups in postoperative vision (0.5 ± 0.4 logMAR vs. 0.5 ± 0.3; p = 0.9962) or proportion with VA ≥ 20/40 (46.4% vs. 43.1%; p = 0.6744) at 12-24 weeks. Postoperative CME was twice as likely in the secondary ERM group (16.5%) compared to the primary ERM group (7.8%) (p = 0.0018). There was no difference in the rate of repeat ERM surgery between the secondary ERM group (1.8%) and the primary ERM group (1.5%) (p = 0.7308). CONCLUSION: Eyes with secondary ERM had significant postoperative improvement in VA. They had worse preoperative VA and had a twofold increase in postoperative CME than primary ERM.
Authors: Ching Hui Ng; Ning Cheung; Jie Jin Wang; Amirul F M Islam; Ryo Kawasaki; Stacy M Meuer; Mary Frances Cotch; Barbara E K Klein; Ronald Klein; Tien Yin Wong Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2010-10-29 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Ahmet T Yazici; Neşe Alagöz; Haci U Celik; Ercüment Bozkurt; Cengiz Alagöz; Mehmet Cakir; Osman Cekiç; Omer F Yilmaz Journal: Retina Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Khin Z Aung; Galina Makeyeva; Madeleine K Adams; Elaine W-T Chong; Lucy Busija; Graham G Giles; Dallas R English; John Hopper; Paul N Baird; Robyn H Guymer; Liubov D Robman Journal: Retina Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 4.256