Literature DB >> 25329082

The power of instructions: Proactive configuration of stimulus-response translation.

Nachshon Meiran1, Maayan Pereg1, Yoav Kessler1, Michael W Cole2, Todd S Braver2.   

Abstract

Humans are characterized by an especially highly developed ability to use instructions to prepare toward upcoming events; yet, it is unclear just how powerful instructions can be. Although prior work provides evidence that instructions can be sufficiently powerful to proactively program working memory to execute stimulus-response (S-R) translations, in a reflexlike fashion (intention-based reflexivity [IBR]), the results to date have been equivocal. To overcome this shortcoming, we developed, and tested in 4 studies, a novel paradigm (the NEXT paradigm) that isolates IBR effects even prior to first task execution. In each miniblock, participants received S-R mapping instructions for a new task. Prior to implementing this mapping, responses were required to advance through screens during a preparatory (NEXT) phase. When the NEXT response was incompatible with the instructed S-R mapping, interference (IBR effect) was observed. This NEXT compatibility effect and performance in the implementation (GO) trials barely changed when prior practice of a few trials was provided. Finally, a manipulation that encouraged preparation resulted in relatively durable NEXT compatibility effects (indicating durable preparatory efforts) coupled with improved GO performance (indicating the success of these efforts). Together, these findings establish IBR as a marker of instructed proactive control. (c) 2015 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25329082     DOI: 10.1037/xlm0000063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  22 in total

1.  Attention to future actions: the influence of instructed S-R versus S-S mappings on attentional control.

Authors:  Helen Tibboel; Baptist Liefooghe; Jan De Houwer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-08-06

2.  The instruction-based congruency effect predicts task execution efficiency: Evidence from inter- and intra-individual differences.

Authors:  Senne Braem; Berre Deltomme; Baptist Liefooghe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2019-11

3.  Evidence for instructions-based updating of task-set representations: the informed fadeout effect.

Authors:  Maayan Pereg; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-16

4.  Reflexive activation of newly instructed stimulus-response rules: evidence from lateralized readiness potentials in no-go trials.

Authors:  Nachshon Meiran; Maayan Pereg; Yoav Kessler; Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.282

5.  Frequency of prospective use modulates instructed task-set interference.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  The task novelty paradox: Flexible control of inflexible neural pathways during rapid instructed task learning.

Authors:  Michael W Cole; Todd S Braver; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 8.989

7.  Power of instructions for task implementation: superiority of explicitly instructed over inferred rules.

Authors:  Maayan Pereg; Nachshon Meiran
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-01-30

8.  Cognitive control over prospective task-set interference.

Authors:  Peter S Whitehead; Tobias Egner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Learning and transfer of working memory gating policies.

Authors:  Apoorva Bhandari; David Badre
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2017-12-12

10.  Aftereffects and deactivation of completed prospective memory intentions: A systematic review.

Authors:  Marcus Möschl; Rico Fischer; Julie M Bugg; Michael K Scullin; Thomas Goschke; Moritz Walser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.