Literature DB >> 28265864

A diffusion decision model analysis of evidence variability in the lexical decision task.

Gabriel Tillman1, Adam F Osth2, Don van Ravenzwaaij3,4, Andrew Heathcote3,5.   

Abstract

The lexical-decision task is among the most commonly used paradigms in psycholinguistics. In both the signal-detection theory and Diffusion Decision Model (DDM; Ratcliff, Gomez, & McKoon, Psychological Review, 111, 159-182, 2004) frameworks, lexical-decisions are based on a continuous source of word-likeness evidence for both words and non-words. The Retrieving Effectively from Memory model of Lexical-Decision (REM-LD; Wagenmakers et al., Cognitive Psychology, 48(3), 332-367, 2004) provides a comprehensive explanation of lexical-decision data and makes the prediction that word-likeness evidence is more variable for words than non-words and that higher frequency words are more variable than lower frequency words. To test these predictions, we analyzed five lexical-decision data sets with the DDM. For all data sets, drift-rate variability changed across word frequency and non-word conditions. For the most part, REM-LD's predictions about the ordering of evidence variability across stimuli in the lexical-decision task were confirmed.

Keywords:  Diffusion decision model; Lexical-decision task; REM-LD

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28265864     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1259-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  25 in total

1.  Single- versus dual-process models of lexical decision performance: insights from response time distributional analysis.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; David A Balota; Michael J Cortese; Jason M Watson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  A diffusion model decomposition of the practice effect.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Joachim Vandekerckhove; Francis Tuerlinckx; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2009-12

3.  Validating the unequal-variance assumption in recognition memory using response time distributions instead of ROC functions: A diffusion model analysis.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Starns; Roger Ratcliff
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.059

4.  A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory.

Authors:  R M Shiffrin; M Steyvers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1997-06

5.  Task-related versus stimulus-specific practice.

Authors:  Gilles Dutilh; Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  Exp Psychol       Date:  2011

6.  Sources of interference in item and associative recognition memory.

Authors:  Adam F Osth; Simon Dennis
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  Word recognition: context effects without priming.

Authors:  D Norris
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-03

8.  Theoretical interpretations of the speed and accuracy of positive and negative responses.

Authors:  R Ratcliff
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Responding to nonwords in the lexical decision task: Insights from the English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; Daragh E Sibley; David A Balota; Roger Ratcliff; Jay Rueckl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2014-10-20       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Modeling confidence and response time in recognition memory.

Authors:  Roger Ratcliff; Jeffrey J Starns
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  1 in total

1.  Computing Bayes factors for evidence-accumulation models using Warp-III bridge sampling.

Authors:  Quentin F Gronau; Andrew Heathcote; Dora Matzke
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2020-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.