Susan Wells1, Ronen Rozenblum2, Andrea Park2, Marie Dunn3, David W Bates4. 1. Section of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Department of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Health Care Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate organizational strategies to promote personal health records (PHRs) adoption with a focus on patients with chronic disease. METHODS: Using semi-structured interviews and a web-based survey, we sampled US health delivery organizations which had implemented PHRs for at least 12 months, were recognized as PHR innovators, and had scored highly in national patient satisfaction surveys. Respondents had lead positions for clinical information systems or high-risk population management. Using grounded theory approach, thematic categories were derived from interviews and coupled with data from the survey. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 30 informants from 16 identified organizations. Organizational strategies were directed towards raising patient awareness via multimedia communications, and provider acceptance and uptake. Strategies for providers were grouped into six main themes: organizational vision, governance and policies, work process redesign, staff training, information technology (IT) support, and monitoring and incentives. Successful organizations actively communicated their vision, engaged leaders at all levels, had clear governance, planning, and protocols, set targets, and celebrated achievement. The most effective strategy for patient uptake was through health professional encouragement. No specific outreach efforts targeted patients with chronic disease. Registration and PHR activity was routinely measured but without reference to a denominator population or high risk subpopulations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Successful PHR implementation represents a social change and operational project catalyzed by a technical solution. The key to clinician acceptance is making their work easier. However, organizations will likely not achieve the value they want from PHRs unless they target specific populations and monitor their uptake.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate organizational strategies to promote personal health records (PHRs) adoption with a focus on patients with chronic disease. METHODS: Using semi-structured interviews and a web-based survey, we sampled US health delivery organizations which had implemented PHRs for at least 12 months, were recognized as PHR innovators, and had scored highly in national patient satisfaction surveys. Respondents had lead positions for clinical information systems or high-risk population management. Using grounded theory approach, thematic categories were derived from interviews and coupled with data from the survey. RESULTS: Interviews were conducted with 30 informants from 16 identified organizations. Organizational strategies were directed towards raising patient awareness via multimedia communications, and provider acceptance and uptake. Strategies for providers were grouped into six main themes: organizational vision, governance and policies, work process redesign, staff training, information technology (IT) support, and monitoring and incentives. Successful organizations actively communicated their vision, engaged leaders at all levels, had clear governance, planning, and protocols, set targets, and celebrated achievement. The most effective strategy for patient uptake was through health professional encouragement. No specific outreach efforts targeted patients with chronic disease. Registration and PHR activity was routinely measured but without reference to a denominator population or high risk subpopulations. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Successful PHR implementation represents a social change and operational project catalyzed by a technical solution. The key to clinician acceptance is making their work easier. However, organizations will likely not achieve the value they want from PHRs unless they target specific populations and monitor their uptake.
Authors: Douglas W Roblin; Thomas K Houston; Jeroan J Allison; Peter J Joski; Edmund R Becker Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-06-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Cyrus K Yamin; Srinivas Emani; Deborah H Williams; Stuart R Lipsitz; Andrew S Karson; Jonathan S Wald; David W Bates Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2011-03-28
Authors: Tom Delbanco; Jan Walker; Sigall K Bell; Jonathan D Darer; Joann G Elmore; Nadine Farag; Henry J Feldman; Roanne Mejilla; Long Ngo; James D Ralston; Stephen E Ross; Neha Trivedi; Elisabeth Vodicka; Suzanne G Leveille Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2012-10-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Urmimala Sarkar; Andrew J Karter; Jennifer Y Liu; Nancy E Adler; Robert Nguyen; Andrea López; Dean Schillinger Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-01-24 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Charlotte A M Paddison; Marc N Elliott; Amelia M Haviland; Donna O Farley; Georgios Lyratzopoulos; Katrin Hambarsoomian; Jacob W Dembosky; Martin O Roland Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2012-11-21 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Peter G Szilagyi; Rebecca Valderrama; Sitaram Vangala; Christina Albertin; David Okikawa; Michael Sloyan; Nathalie Lopez; Carlos F Lerner Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-03-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Jennifer N Hill; Bridget M Smith; Frances M Weaver; Kim M Nazi; Florian P Thomas; Barry Goldstein; Timothy P Hogan Journal: J Spinal Cord Med Date: 2017-03-21 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Anuj K Dalal; Patricia C Dykes; Sarah Collins; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Kumiko Ohashi; Ronen Rozenblum; Diana Stade; Kelly McNally; Constance R C Morrison; Sucheta Ravindran; Eli Mlaver; John Hanna; Frank Chang; Ravali Kandala; George Getty; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Alexandra C Businger; Theresa E Fuller; Jeffrey L Schnipper; Sarah Collins Rossetti; Kumiko O Schnock; Ronen Rozenblum; Anuj K Dalal; James Benneyan; David W Bates; Patricia C Dykes Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2020-02-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Domino Determann; Mattijs S Lambooij; Dorte Gyrd-Hansen; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Ewout W Steyerberg; Marcel Heldoorn; Line Bjørnskov Pedersen; G Ardine de Wit Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sarah A Collins; Ronen Rozenblum; Wai Yin Leung; Constance Rc Morrison; Diana L Stade; Kelly McNally; Patricia Q Bourie; Anthony Massaro; Seth Bokser; Cindy Dwyer; Ryan S Greysen; Priyanka Agarwal; Kevin Thornton; Anuj K Dalal Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2017-04-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Gemmae M Fix; Timothy P Hogan; Daniel J Amante; D Keith McInnes; Kim M Nazi; Steven R Simon Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Alex Roehrs; Cristiano André da Costa; Rodrigo da Rosa Righi; Kleinner Silva Farias de Oliveira Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-01-06 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Terese Otte-Trojel; Thomas G Rundall; Antoinette de Bont; Joris van de Klundert; Mary E Reed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-12-16 Impact factor: 2.655