Literature DB >> 15210383

Identifying gaps between guidelines and clinical practice in the evaluation and treatment of patients with hypertension.

Cathy B Spranger1, Andrea J Ries, Carrie A Berge, Nina B Radford, Ronald G Victor.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hypertension remains uncontrolled in the majority of affected patients despite treatment. Our goal was to identify specific action items in the Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC VI) guidelines that are not being translated into clinical practice.
METHODS: We transformed the major JNC VI tables into a chart review instrument that was used to retrospectively analyze the medical records of 249 patients with newly diagnosed hypertension who had been followed for 18 months at one of six community-based primary care clinics.
RESULTS: The practices of physicians deviated from the guidelines in several ways. Hypertension was staged initially on a single blood pressure recording in 85% (n = 212) of patients. No electrocardiogram was ordered for 89% (n = 221) of patients, while other mandatory laboratory tests were ordered for about 50%. After 18 months, 40% (72/179) of patients for whom prescription records were identified were still on monotherapy, and target blood pressure (<140/90 mm Hg) was achieved in only 33% (83/249) of patients. All of the 35 patients with diabetes received an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, but only 1.7 medications were prescribed per patient at study end.
CONCLUSION: In this clinic system, staging of blood pressure with multiple measurements, thorough assessment of global cardiovascular risk, and titration of multiple antihypertensive medications to achieve blood pressure goal are components of the JNC VI guidelines that are not well translated into clinical practice. Overcoming these practice defects will require innovative multilevel interventions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15210383     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  24 in total

1.  Current Status and Future Prospects of Clinical Psychology: Toward a Scientifically Principled Approach to Mental and Behavioral Health Care.

Authors:  Timothy B Baker; Richard M McFall; Varda Shoham
Journal:  Psychol Sci Public Interest       Date:  2008-11-01

2.  Antihypertensive response to combination of olmesartan and amlodipine does not depend on method and time of drug administration.

Authors:  Francesco Rozza; Valentina Trimarco; Raffaele Izzo; Mario Santoro; Maria Virginia Manzi; Marina Marino; Gianfranco Di Renzo; Bruno Trimarco
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-05-09

Review 3.  Bringing Social Context into Diabetes Care: Intervening on Social Risks versus Providing Contextualized Care.

Authors:  Danielle Hessler; Vicky Bowyer; Rachel Gold; Laura Shields-Zeeman; Erika Cottrell; Laura M Gottlieb
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 4.  Electrical stimulation of the carotid sinus for the treatment of resistant hypertension.

Authors:  J D Filippone; James A Sloand; Karl A Illig; John D Bisognano
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.369

5.  Cost implications of improving blood pressure management among U.S. adults.

Authors:  Teryl K Nuckols; Julia E Aledort; John Adams; Julie Lai; Myong-Hyun Go; Joan Keesey; Elizabeth McGlynn
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Predicted impact of various clinical practice strategies on cardiovascular risk for the treatment of hypertension: a clinical trial simulation study.

Authors:  Yuyan Jin; Robert Bies; Marc R Gastonguay; Yaning Wang; Norman Stockbridge; Jogarao Gobburu; Rajanikanth Madabushi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 7.  Can we justify goal blood pressure of <140/90 mm Hg in most hypertensives?

Authors:  Raymond R Townsend
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.369

8.  [Durability of the effects of a quality improvement intervention in hypertensive patients on long-term follow-up (CICLO-RISK study)].

Authors:  Manuel Angel Gómez Marcos; Emiliano Rodríguez Sánchez; Emilio Ramos Delgado; Carmen Fernández Alonso; Angel Luis Montejo Gónzalez; Luis García Ortiz
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 1.137

9.  Misclassification and discordance of measured blood pressure from patient's true blood pressure in current clinical practice: a clinical trial simulation case study.

Authors:  Yuyan Jin; Robert Bies; Marc R Gastonguay; Norman Stockbridge; Jogarao Gobburu; Rajanikanth Madabushi
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2012-05-09       Impact factor: 2.745

10.  Control of blood pressure in North Carolina primary care: baseline data from the GLAD Heart Trial.

Authors:  Erica L Rosenberger; David C Goff; Cralen C Davis; Caroline S Blackwell; Alain G Bertoni
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.