Literature DB >> 11208750

Baseline Characteristics and Early Blood Pressure Control in the CONVINCE Trial.

Henry R. Black1, William J. Elliott, James D. Neaton, Gregory Grandits, Patricia Grambsch, Richard H. Grimm, Lennart Hansson, Yves Lacoucière, James Muller, Peter Sleight, Michael A. Weber, William B. White, Gordon Williams, Janet Wittes, Alberto Zanchetti, T. Daniel Fakouhi, Robert J. Anders.   

Abstract

-Blood pressure (BP) control rates around the world are suboptimal. Part 2 of the National Health and Nutrition Educational Survey (NHANES) III indicates that only 27.4% of hypertensive Americans aged 18 to 74 years have a BP of <140/90 mm Hg. We wanted to assess BP control during the first 2 years and to describe the baseline characteristics of patients enrolled in the Controlled ONset Verapamil INvestigation of Cardiovascular Endpoints (CONVINCE) Study, an international clinical trial that compares outcomes in hypertensive patients randomized to initial treatment with either controlled-onset extended-release verapamil or the investigator's choice of atenolol or hydrochlorothiazide. At randomization, BP was <140/90 mm Hg in only 20.3% of the 16 602 subjects (average+/-SD age 65.6+/-7.4 years; 56% women, 84% white/7% black/7% Hispanic). The average BP at enrollment was 148/85 mm Hg for patients taking BP medications (n=13 879) and 161/94 mm Hg for previously untreated patients (n=2723). After medication titration, with a transtelephonic computer that recommended an increase in the dose or number of antihypertensive agents whenever the BP was 140/90 mm Hg, 84.8% of the subjects attained the goal BP. During 2 years of treatment, BP control was maintained in 67% to 69% of the subjects (69% to 71% for systolic BP of <140 mm Hg and 90% for diastolic BP of <90 mm Hg). These data suggest that the control of systolic BP is more difficult than the control of diastolic BP. The US national goal of having 50% of hypertensives with a BP of <140/90 mm Hg may be achievable if a forced titration strategy is used. Interested investigators, free care and medications, and well-educated subjects may make the attainment of such a goal easier in the CONVINCE study than in the general population.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11208750     DOI: 10.1161/01.hyp.37.1.12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hypertension        ISSN: 0194-911X            Impact factor:   10.190


  59 in total

Review 1.  Lessons learned from prematurely terminated clinical trials.

Authors:  D Sica
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Systolic hypertension and cardiovascular risk reduction: a clinical review.

Authors:  W C Cushman
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 3.  Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure versus pulse pressure.

Authors:  William B White
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Population strategies to treat hypertension.

Authors:  Daniel T Lackland
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2005-08

Review 5.  Antihypertensive prescribing: do we have reason to celebrate?

Authors:  Barry L Carter
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 6.  Resistant hypertension.

Authors:  David A Calhoun; Mohammad A Zaman; Mari K Nishizaka
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Description of pharmacist interventions during physician-pharmacist co-management of hypertension.

Authors:  Shannon J Von Muenster; Barry L Carter; Cynthia A Weber; Michael E Ernst; Jessica L Milchak; Jennifer J G Steffensmeier; Yinghui Xu
Journal:  Pharm World Sci       Date:  2007-08-21

8.  Screening, treatment, and control of hypertension in US private physician offices, 2003-2004.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Randall S Stafford
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 10.190

Review 9.  Optimal use of beta-blockers in high-risk hypertension: a guide to dosing equivalence.

Authors:  Janet B McGill
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-06-01

Review 10.  The evolution of systolic blood pressure as a strong predictor of cardiovascular risk and the effectiveness of fixed-dose ARB/CCB combinations in lowering levels of this preferential target.

Authors:  Jean-Jacques Mourad
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.