Literature DB >> 25325892

Evaluation of femtosecond laser-assisted and manual clear corneal incisions and their effect on surgically induced astigmatism and higher-order aberrations.

Zoltán Z Nagy, Arpád Dunai, Kinga Kránitz, Agnes Ildikó Takács, Gábor László Sándor, Réka Hécz, Michael C Knorz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate femtosecond laser-assisted and manual clear corneal incisions and their effect on surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) and corneal higher-order aberrations (HOAs).
METHODS: In a prospective randomized study, conventional phacoemulsification with a 2.8-mm clear corneal incision using a disposable keratome was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (manual group), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with a 2.8-mm biplanar clear corneal tunnel created by a femtosecond laser (LenSx; Alcon Laboratories, Inc., Aliso Viejo, CA) was performed in 20 eyes of 20 patients (femtosecond laser group). Corneal topography readings and corneal wavefront aberrations (diameter: 9.0 mm) were obtained using a Scheimpflug camera (Pentacam HR; Oculus Optikgerate, Wetzlar, Germany) preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in SIA between the groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.47 ± 0.13 vs manual group: 0.41 ± 0.14; P = .218), but the axis deviation of the SIA axis from the previously planned axis was significantly smaller in the femtosecond laser group compared to the manual group (4.47°± 2.59° vs 7.38°± 4.72°, respectively; P = .048). Corneal HOAs increased significantly in both groups (femtosecond laser group: 0.13 ± 0.09 to 0.18 ± 0.12, P = .025; manual group: 0.13 ± 0.05 to 0.15 ± 0.05, P = .002), but preoperative and postoperative values did not differ significantly between them (P = .472 and .078, respectively). Lower-order and total corneal aberration values remained stable in both groups (P > .05).
CONCLUSIONS: There was no difference in SIA and induced HOAs between manual and femtosecond laser-created clear corneal incisions. Copyright 2014, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25325892     DOI: 10.3928/1081597X-20140711-04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Refract Surg        ISSN: 1081-597X            Impact factor:   3.573


  11 in total

1.  Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification: comparison of internal aberrations and visual quality.

Authors:  Yueyang Zhong; Yanan Zhu; Wei Wang; Kai Wang; Xin Liu; Ke Yao
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-10-12       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Clinical outcomes and complications between FLACS and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery: a PRISMA-compliant Meta-analysis of 25 randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Li Chen; Chen Hu; Xiao Lin; Hao-Yu Li; Yi Du; Yi-Hua Yao; Jun Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-07-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  The Evolution of Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Geetha Davis
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2016 Jan-Feb

4.  Is Femto cataract surgery here to stay?

Authors:  Ahmed A Al-Saleh
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015 Apr-Jun

Review 5.  Update and clinical utility of the LenSx femtosecond laser in cataract surgery.

Authors:  Timothy V Roberts; Michael Lawless; Gerard Sutton; Chris Hodge
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-17

Review 6.  Reviewing the visual benefits of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery: Can we improve our outcomes?

Authors:  Michael Lawless; Lewis Levitz; Chris Hodge
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Assessment of surgeon experience with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

Authors:  Christian Song; Connor J Baharozian; Kathryn M Hatch; Jonathan H Talamo
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-06

8.  One-year follow-up of changes in refraction and aberrations induced by corneal incision.

Authors:  Eloy A Villegas; Encarna Alcón; Elena Rubio; José María Marín; Pablo Artal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Comparing the Curative Effects between Femtosecond Laser-Assisted Cataract Surgery and Conventional Phacoemulsification Surgery: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Xinyi Chen; Kailin Chen; Jiliang He; Ke Yao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparison Between Digital and Manual Marking for Toric Intraocular Lenses: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Abdel Hamid Elhofi; Hany Ahmed Helaly
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.