Literature DB >> 25325740

The evolution of offspring size across life-history stages.

Holly K Kindsvater1, Sarah P Otto.   

Abstract

Females vary in the size of offspring that they produce, often in a manner that depends on maternal age or stage. This is puzzling, given that offspring size is predicted to evolve to a single optimal value where the gain in fitness from being larger exactly offsets the fitness lost to the mother by producing fewer offspring. We used a stage-structured life-history model to determine the optimal offspring size for females in different stages. We found that optimal offspring size does not vary with maternal stage when offspring fitness depends only on its size and not on the stage of the mother. This negative result holds even with density dependence, when larger offspring compete better. However, a trade-off between offspring size and maternal survival affects the optimal offspring size. The future reproductive value of the female, coupled with the costs and benefits of offspring investment, drives the evolution of stage-dependent offspring size. If producing larger offspring is riskier for mothers, females produce smaller offspring when their reproductive value in the next time step is large relative to current reproductive prospects. These analyses provide a novel framework for understanding why offspring size varies in age- and stage-structured populations.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25325740     DOI: 10.1086/678248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  6 in total

Review 1.  Life-history plasticity in female threespine stickleback.

Authors:  J A Baker; M A Wund; D C Heins; R W King; M L Reyes; S A Foster
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Parental age affects somatic mutation rates in the progeny of flowering plants.

Authors:  Amit Kumar Singh; Tufail Bashir; Christian Sailer; Viswanathan Gurumoorthy; Anantha Maharasi Ramakrishnan; Shanmuhapreya Dhanapal; Ueli Grossniklaus; Ramamurthy Baskar
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2015-03-25       Impact factor: 8.340

3.  Des différences, pourquoi? Transmission, maintenance and effects of phenotypic variance.

Authors:  Floriane Plard; Jean-Michel Gaillard; Tim Coulson; Shripad Tuljapurkar
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.091

4.  How maternal investment varies with environmental factors and the age and physiological state of wild tsetse Glossina pallidipes and Glossina morsitans morsitans.

Authors:  John W Hargrove; M Odwell Muzari; Sinead English
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 2.963

5.  Female reproductive competition explains variation in prenatal investment in wild banded mongooses.

Authors:  Emma L Inzani; Harry H Marshall; Jennifer L Sanderson; Hazel J Nichols; Faye J Thompson; Gladys Kalema-Zikusoka; Sarah J Hodge; Michael A Cant; Emma I K Vitikainen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 6.  Ten principles from evolutionary ecology essential for effective marine conservation.

Authors:  Holly K Kindsvater; Marc Mangel; John D Reynolds; Nicholas K Dulvy
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 2.912

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.