Literature DB >> 25322304

Social network effects of nonlifesaving early-stage breast cancer detection on mammography rates.

Sarah A Nowak1, Andrew M Parker.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We estimated the effect of anecdotes of early-stage, screen-detected cancer for which screening was not lifesaving on the demand for mammography.
METHODS: We constructed an agent-based model of mammography decisions, in which 10 000 agents that represent women aged 40 to 100 years were linked together on a social network, which was parameterized with a survey of 716 women conducted through the RAND American Life Panel. Our model represents a population in equilibrium, with demographics reflecting the current US population based on the most recent available census data.
RESULTS: The aggregate effect of women learning about 1 category of cancers-those that would be detected but would not be lethal in the absence of screening-was a 13.8 percentage point increase in annual screening rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Anecdotes of detection of early-stage cancers relayed through social networks may substantially increase demand for a screening test even when the detection through screening was nonlifesaving.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25322304      PMCID: PMC4232109          DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Public Health        ISSN: 0090-0036            Impact factor:   9.308


  34 in total

1.  The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: who gets the message about breast cancer screening?

Authors:  M S O'Malley; J A Earp; S T Hawley; M J Schell; H F Mathews; J Mitchell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Women's cognitive and affective reactions to breast cancer survivor stories: a structural equation analysis.

Authors:  Amy McQueen; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-09-17

4.  The importance of health insurance as a determinant of cancer screening: evidence from the Women's Health Initiative.

Authors:  J Hsia; E Kemper; C Kiefe; J Zapka; S Sofaer; M Pettinger; D Bowen; M Limacher; L Lillington; E Mason
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  What if I don't treat my PSA-detected prostate cancer? Answers from three natural history models.

Authors:  Roman Gulati; Elisabeth M Wever; Alex Tsodikov; David F Penson; Lurdes Y T Inoue; Jeffrey Katcher; Shih-Yuan Lee; Eveline A M Heijnsdijk; Gerrit Draisma; Harry J de Koning; Ruth Etzioni
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Likelihood that a woman with screen-detected breast cancer has had her "life saved" by that screening.

Authors:  H Gilbert Welch; Brittney A Frankel
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-24

7.  Chapter 13: CISNET lung models: comparison of model assumptions and model structures.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; William D Hazelton; Marek Kimmel; Lauren D Clarke
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

8.  The cumulative risk of false-positive fecal occult blood test after 10 years of colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Eric Johnson; Raymond Hsia; Carolyn M Rutter
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Enthusiasm for cancer screening in the United States.

Authors:  Lisa M Schwartz; Steven Woloshin; Floyd J Fowler; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence.

Authors:  Archie Bleyer; H Gilbert Welch
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  3 in total

1.  Awareness of treatment history in family and friends, and mental health care seeking propensity.

Authors:  François L Thériault; Ian Colman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 4.328

2.  Patient Navigation Can Improve Breast Cancer Outcomes among African American Women in Chicago: Insights from a Modeling Study.

Authors:  Aditya S Khanna; Bryan Brickman; Michael Cronin; Nyahne Q Bergeron; John R Scheel; Joseph Hibdon; Elizabeth A Calhoun; Karriem S Watson; Shaila M Strayhorn; Yamilé Molina
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 5.801

3.  Using an Agent-based Model to Examine Deimplementation of Breast Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker; Archana Radhakrishnan; Nancy Schoenborn; Craig E Pollack
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2021-01       Impact factor: 2.983

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.