Literature DB >> 22882887

Chapter 13: CISNET lung models: comparison of model assumptions and model structures.

Pamela M McMahon1, William D Hazelton, Marek Kimmel, Lauren D Clarke.   

Abstract

Sophisticated modeling techniques can be powerful tools to help us understand the effects of cancer control interventions on population trends in cancer incidence and mortality. Readers of journal articles are, however, rarely supplied with modeling details. Six modeling groups collaborated as part of the National Cancer Institute's Cancer Intervention and Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) to investigate the contribution of U.S. tobacco-control efforts toward reducing lung cancer deaths over the period 1975-2000. The six models included in this monograph were developed independently and use distinct, complementary approaches toward modeling the natural history of lung cancer. The models used the same data for inputs, and agreed on the design of the analysis and the outcome measures. This article highlights aspects of the models that are most relevant to similarities of or differences between the results. Structured comparisons can increase the transparency of these complex models.
© 2011 Society for Risk Analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22882887      PMCID: PMC3478678          DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01714.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  57 in total

Review 1.  Use of modeling to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of cancer screening programs.

Authors:  Amy B Knudsen; Pamela M McMahon; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Analysis of lung cancer incidence in the Nurses' Health and the Health Professionals' Follow-Up Studies using a multistage carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; William D Hazelton; Graham A Colditz; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Estimation of unit risk for coke oven emissions.

Authors:  S H Moolgavkar; E G Luebeck; E L Anderson
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Relative and absolute risks of cigarette smoking on major histologic types of lung cancer in Korean men.

Authors:  Young Ho Yun; Min Kyung Lim; Kyu Won Jung; Jong-Myon Bae; Sang Min Park; Soon Ae Shin; Jin Soo Lee; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Multistage carcinogenesis and lung cancer mortality in three cohorts.

Authors:  William D Hazelton; Mark S Clements; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Analysis of the incidence of solid cancer among atomic bomb survivors using a two-stage model of carcinogenesis.

Authors:  M Kai; E G Luebeck; S H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.841

7.  Age effects and temporal trends in adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and gastric cardia (United States).

Authors:  Jihyoun Jeon; E Georg Luebeck; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  The change in excess risk of lung cancer attributable to smoking following smoking cessation: an examination of different analytic approaches using CPS-I data.

Authors:  James D Knoke; David M Burns; Michael J Thun
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2007-11-09       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Non-overlapping and non-cell-type-specific gene expression signatures predict lung cancer survival.

Authors:  Zhifu Sun; Dennis A Wigle; Ping Yang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-20       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Smoking and smoking cessation in relation to mortality in women.

Authors:  Stacey A Kenfield; Meir J Stampfer; Bernard A Rosner; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Chapter 6: Lung cancer in never smokers: epidemiology and risk prediction models.

Authors:  William J McCarthy; Rafael Meza; Jihyoun Jeon; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

2.  Social network effects of nonlifesaving early-stage breast cancer detection on mammography rates.

Authors:  Sarah A Nowak; Andrew M Parker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Comparative analysis of 5 lung cancer natural history and screening models that reproduce outcomes of the NLST and PLCO trials.

Authors:  Rafael Meza; Kevin ten Haaf; Chung Yin Kong; Ayca Erdogan; William C Black; Martin C Tammemagi; Sung Eun Choi; Jihyoun Jeon; Summer S Han; Vidit Munshi; Joost van Rosmalen; Paul Pinsky; Pamela M McMahon; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer; William D Hazelton; Sylvia K Plevritis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Chapter 8: The FHCRC lung cancer model.

Authors:  William D Hazelton; Jihyoun Jeon; Rafael Meza; Suresh H Moolgavkar
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Chapter 9: The MGH-HMS lung cancer policy model: tobacco control versus screening.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Chung Yin Kong; Bruce E Johnson; Milton C Weinstein; Jane C Weeks; Angela C Tramontano; Lauren E Cipriano; Colleen Bouzan; G Scott Gazelle
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.000

6.  Prediction of lung cancer risk based on age and smoking history.

Authors:  Jason H T Bates; Katharine L Hamlington; Garth Garrison; C Matthew Kinsey
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 5.428

7.  Predicting the Mortality Benefit of CT Screening for Second Lung Cancer in a High-Risk Population.

Authors:  C Matthew Kinsey; Katharine L Hamlington; Jacqueline O'Toole; Renee Stapleton; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Large-scale systematic analysis of exposure to multiple cancer risk factors and the associations between exposure patterns and cancer incidence.

Authors:  Julia Steinberg; Sarsha Yap; David Goldsbury; Visalini Nair-Shalliker; Emily Banks; Karen Canfell; Dianne L O'Connell
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparing benefits from many possible computed tomography lung cancer screening programs: extrapolating from the National Lung Screening Trial using comparative modeling.

Authors:  Pamela M McMahon; Rafael Meza; Sylvia K Plevritis; William C Black; C Martin Tammemagi; Ayca Erdogan; Kevin ten Haaf; William Hazelton; Theodore R Holford; Jihyoun Jeon; Lauren Clarke; Chung Yin Kong; Sung Eun Choi; Vidit N Munshi; Summer S Han; Joost van Rosmalen; Paul F Pinsky; Suresh Moolgavkar; Harry J de Koning; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 3.752

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.