| Literature DB >> 25320048 |
Kate L White1, J Elliott Robinson1, Hu Zhu1, Jeffrey F DiBerto1, Prabhakar R Polepally1, Jordan K Zjawiony1, David E Nichols1, C J Malanga1, Bryan L Roth2.
Abstract
The hypothesis that functionally selective G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) agonists may have enhanced therapeutic benefits has revitalized interest for many GPCR targets. In particular, although κ-opioid receptor (KOR) agonists are analgesic with a low risk of dependence and abuse, their use is limited by a propensity to induce sedation, motor incoordination, hallucinations, and dysphoria-like states. Several laboratories have produced a body of work suggesting that G protein-biased KOR agonists might be analgesic with fewer side effects. Although that has been an intriguing hypothesis, suitable KOR-selective and G protein-biased agonists have not been available to test this idea. Here we provide data using a G protein-biased agonist, RB-64 (22-thiocyanatosalvinorin A), which suggests that KOR-mediated G protein signaling induces analgesia and aversion, whereas β-arrestin-2 signaling may be associated with motor incoordination. Additionally, unlike unbiased KOR agonists, the G protein-biased ligand RB-64 does not induce sedation and does not have anhedonia-like actions, suggesting that a mechanism other than G protein signaling mediates these effects. Our findings provide the first evidence for a highly selective and G protein-biased tool compound for which many, but not all, of the negative side effects of KOR agonists can be minimized by creating G protein-biased KOR agonists.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25320048 PMCID: PMC4279099 DOI: 10.1124/jpet.114.216820
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther ISSN: 0022-3565 Impact factor: 4.030