| Literature DB >> 16901028 |
Martha Q Lacy1, Angela Dispenzieri, Morie A Gertz, Philip R Greipp, Kimberly L Gollbach, Suzanne R Hayman, Shaji Kumar, John A Lust, S Vincent Rajkumar, Stephen J Russell, Thomas E Witzig, Steven R Zeldenrust, David Dingli, P Lief Bergsagel, Rafael Fonseca, Craig B Reeder, A Keith Stewart, Vivek Roy, Robert J Dalton, Alan B Carr, Deepak Kademani, Eugene E Keller, Christopher F Viozzi, Robert A Kyle.
Abstract
Bisphosphonates are effective in the prevention and treatment of bone disease in multiple myeloma (MM). Osteonecrosis of the jaw is Increasingly recognized as a serious complication of long-term bisphosphonate therapy. Issues such as the choice of bisphosphonate and duration of therapy have become the subject of intense debate given patient safety concerns. We reviewed available data concerning the use of bisphosphonates in MM. Guidelines for the use of bisphosphonates in MM were developed by a multidisciplinary panel consisting of hematologists, dental specialists, and nurses specializing in the treatment of MM. We conclude that intravenous pamidronate and intravenous zoledronic acid are equally effective and superior to placebo in reducing skeletal complications. Pamidronate is favored over zoledronic acid until more data are available on the risk of complications (osteonecrosis of the jaw). We recommend discontinuing bisphosphonates after 2 years of therapy for patients who achieve complete response and/or plateau phase. For patients whose disease is active, who have not achieved a response, or who have threatening bone disease beyond 2 years, therapy can be decreased to every 3 months. These guidelines were developed in the Interest of patient safety and will be reexamined as new data emerge regarding risks and benefits.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16901028 DOI: 10.4065/81.8.1047
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mayo Clin Proc ISSN: 0025-6196 Impact factor: 7.616