Joanne-Marie Cairns1, Clare Bambra1, Frances C Hillier-Brown2, Helen J Moore2, Carolyn D Summerbell2. 1. Department of Geography, Durham University Durham, Durham DH1 3LE, UK Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK. 2. School of Medicine, Pharmacy and Health, Wolfson Research Institute for Health and Wellbeing, Durham University Queen's Campus, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Addressing socio-economic inequalities in obesity is a public health priority and the workplace is seen as a potential health promotion site. However, there is a lack of evidence on what works. This article systematically reviews studies of the effects of workplace interventions on socio-economic inequalities in obesity. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched for published or unpublished experimental and observational evaluation studies. Nine electronic databases were searched as well as websites and bibliographies. Included studies were data extracted, quality assessed and narratively synthesized. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included of which 14 examined behavioural interventions and 4 mixed or environmental ones. While most studies (n = 12) found no effects on inequalities in obesity--and a minority found increases (n = 3), there was also some evidence of potentially effective workplace interventions (n = 3) especially in terms of physical activity interventions targeted at lower occupational groups. CONCLUSION: There is experimental evidence that workplace delivered physical activity interventions have the potential to reduce inequalities in obesity by targeting lower occupational groups. However, overall, the evidence base is small, largely from the USA, and of a low quality. More high-quality, experimental study designs are required.
BACKGROUND: Addressing socio-economic inequalities in obesity is a public health priority and the workplace is seen as a potential health promotion site. However, there is a lack of evidence on what works. This article systematically reviews studies of the effects of workplace interventions on socio-economic inequalities in obesity. METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, we searched for published or unpublished experimental and observational evaluation studies. Nine electronic databases were searched as well as websites and bibliographies. Included studies were data extracted, quality assessed and narratively synthesized. RESULTS: Eighteen studies were included of which 14 examined behavioural interventions and 4 mixed or environmental ones. While most studies (n = 12) found no effects on inequalities in obesity--and a minority found increases (n = 3), there was also some evidence of potentially effective workplace interventions (n = 3) especially in terms of physical activity interventions targeted at lower occupational groups. CONCLUSION: There is experimental evidence that workplace delivered physical activity interventions have the potential to reduce inequalities in obesity by targeting lower occupational groups. However, overall, the evidence base is small, largely from the USA, and of a low quality. More high-quality, experimental study designs are required.
Authors: Lea Maes; Eveline Van Cauwenberghe; Wendy Van Lippevelde; Heleen Spittaels; Ellen De Pauw; Jean-Michel Oppert; Frank J Van Lenthe; Johannes Brug; Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2011-07-23 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Marci Kramish Campbell; Irene Tessaro; Brenda DeVellis; Salli Benedict; Kristine Kelsey; Leigh Belton; Antonio Sanhueza Journal: Prev Med Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Rosanne L A Freak-Poli; Rory Wolfe; Helen Walls; Kathryn Backholer; Anna Peeters Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2011-10-25 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Karen M Oude Hengel; Pieter Coenen; Suzan J W Robroek; Cecile R L Boot; Allard J van der Beek; Frank J Van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2019-02-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Pieter Coenen; Suzan J W Robroek; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Karen M Oude Hengel Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2020-09-04 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Amelia A Lake; Sarah A Smith; Charlotte E Bryant; Sevil Alinia; Kirsten Brandt; Chris J Seal; Inge Tetens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2016-08-19 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rachel G Tabak; Jaime R Strickland; Richard I Stein; Hank Dart; Graham A Colditz; Bridget Kirk; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Rachel G Tabak; Jaime R Strickland; Bridget Kirk; Ryan Colvin; Richard I Stein; Hank Dart; Graham A Colditz; Ann Marie Dale; Bradley A Evanoff Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2020-04-28
Authors: Suzan J W Robroek; Karen M Oude Hengel; Allard J van der Beek; Cécile R L Boot; Frank J van Lenthe; Alex Burdorf; Pieter Coenen Journal: Obes Rev Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 9.213
Authors: Nathaly Garzón-Orjuela; Daniel Felipe Samacá-Samacá; Silvia Catalina Luque Angulo; Carmen Verônica Mendes Abdala; Ludovic Reveiz; Javier Eslava-Schmalbach Journal: Int J Equity Health Date: 2020-10-28