PURPOSE: To distinguish focal fibrotic and non-fibrotic lesions in left-ventricular myocardium (LVM) in hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy (HCM)-subjects, we compared myocardial regional peak-strain values using two-dimensional speckle-tracking transthoracic-echocardiography (TTE) in multislice computed-tomography (CT)-detected fibrotic, non-fibrotic and normal control lesions. METHODS: Twenty subjects (10 consecutive HCM-subjects (8-males, mean 63.4-years), 10 healthy controls (5-males, mean 51.5-years)) underwent speckle-tracking TTE (iE-33), and analysis of regional peak-longitudinal (LS) and radial-strain (RS), and corresponding strain rates in each of 17 LVM segments (American-Heart-Association classification). In HCM-subjects, fibrotic lesions were identified by early-phase defective enhancement and late-phase abnormal enhancement by CT (Light-Speed-Ultra-16). Regional peak LS and RS at basal, mid and apical levels were measured in MSCT-detected fibrotic and non-fibrotic LVM lesions. RESULTS: In 10 HCM subjects, 143 lesions (84.1%) yielded good tracking on TTE. Twenty lesions showed fibrotic changes in 5 subjects by CT. Regional peak-LS and RS absolute values were significantly lower in both fibrotic and non-fibrotic lesions in HCM subjects than in controls at basal, mid, apical levels (all P<0.05). While peak-LS (%) absolute values were significantly lower in fibrotic than non-fibrotic lesions at basal, mid and apical levels (all P<0.05), regional peak-RS absolute values were significantly lower only at mid levels. LS was a more sensitive indicator than the corresponding rate, with better reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: In HCM, regional peak-LS was significantly lower in fibrotic than non-fibrotic lesions in LVM by CT. Regional peak-LS by speckle-tracking provides useful information noninvasively to distinguish fibrotic from non-fibrotic lesions in LVM in HCM and normal LVM in healthy controls.
PURPOSE: To distinguish focal fibrotic and non-fibrotic lesions in left-ventricular myocardium (LVM) in hypertrophic-cardiomyopathy (HCM)-subjects, we compared myocardial regional peak-strain values using two-dimensional speckle-tracking transthoracic-echocardiography (TTE) in multislice computed-tomography (CT)-detected fibrotic, non-fibrotic and normal control lesions. METHODS: Twenty subjects (10 consecutive HCM-subjects (8-males, mean 63.4-years), 10 healthy controls (5-males, mean 51.5-years)) underwent speckle-tracking TTE (iE-33), and analysis of regional peak-longitudinal (LS) and radial-strain (RS), and corresponding strain rates in each of 17 LVM segments (American-Heart-Association classification). In HCM-subjects, fibrotic lesions were identified by early-phase defective enhancement and late-phase abnormal enhancement by CT (Light-Speed-Ultra-16). Regional peak LS and RS at basal, mid and apical levels were measured in MSCT-detected fibrotic and non-fibrotic LVM lesions. RESULTS: In 10 HCM subjects, 143 lesions (84.1%) yielded good tracking on TTE. Twenty lesions showed fibrotic changes in 5 subjects by CT. Regional peak-LS and RS absolute values were significantly lower in both fibrotic and non-fibrotic lesions in HCM subjects than in controls at basal, mid, apical levels (all P<0.05). While peak-LS (%) absolute values were significantly lower in fibrotic than non-fibrotic lesions at basal, mid and apical levels (all P<0.05), regional peak-RS absolute values were significantly lower only at mid levels. LS was a more sensitive indicator than the corresponding rate, with better reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: In HCM, regional peak-LS was significantly lower in fibrotic than non-fibrotic lesions in LVM by CT. Regional peak-LS by speckle-tracking provides useful information noninvasively to distinguish fibrotic from non-fibrotic lesions in LVM in HCM and normal LVM in healthy controls.
Authors: Christoph Langer; M Both; H Harders; M Lutz; M Eden; C Kühl; B Sattler; O Jansen; P Schaefer; N Frey Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-10-15 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Gregory R Hartlage; Jonathan H Kim; Patrick T Strickland; Alan C Cheng; Nima Ghasemzadeh; Maria A Pernetz; Stephen D Clements; B Robinson Williams Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-01-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: C Langer; M Lutz; M Eden; M Lüdde; M Hohnhorst; C Gierloff; M Both; W Burchert; L Faber; D Horstkotte; N Frey; C Prinz Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: F Sanfilippo; C Corredor; N Fletcher; L Tritapepe; F L Lorini; A Arcadipane; A Vieillard-Baron; M Cecconi Journal: Crit Care Date: 2018-08-04 Impact factor: 9.097