Darragh F Halpenny1, Gregory J Riely2, Sara Hayes1, Helena Yu2, Junting Zheng3, Chaya S Moskowitz3, Michelle S Ginsberg4. 1. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. 2. Thoracic Oncology Service, Division of Solid Tumor Oncology, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. 3. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. 4. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, United States. Electronic address: ginsberm@MSKCC.ORG.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: 5% of lung adenocarcinomas harbor rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. This study compared computed tomography (CT) imaging features in patients with ALK rearrangements and those with EGFR mutations. MATERIAL/ METHODS: 30 patients with ALK rearrangements were studied. 97 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were used as controls. Features assessed included size and location of thoracic lymphadenopathy, and the size, contour, consistency and location of the primary tumor. RESULTS: 127 lung adenocarcinomas were examined. 30 (24%) tumors harbored ALK rearrangements, 97 (76%) tumors harbored EGFR mutations. ALK tumors had larger thoracic lymphadenopathy than the control group (p=0.005). Both readers identified 17 (57%) patients in the ALK group with lymph nodes >1.5cm. Reader 1 identified 19 (20%) patients in the EGFR group with lymph nodes >1.5cm, and reader 2 identified 18 (19%) (kappa 0.969). Patients with ALK rearrangements were more likely to have multifocal lymphadenopathy. Reader 1 identified 22 (73%) ALK patients versus 35 (36%) EGFR patients with multifocal thoracic nodal enlargement, while reader 2 identified 20 (67%) ALK patients versus 30 (31%) EGFR patients (kappa 0.953). 92% of ALK positive lesions were solid. CONCLUSION: ALK positive lung adenocarcinomas are more likely than EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas to be associated with larger volume, multifocal thoracic lymphadenopathy. While routine testing for ALK should be standard, the presence of such characteristics in a solid tumor should further prompt testing for ALK rearrangement.
INTRODUCTION: 5% of lung adenocarcinomas harbor rearrangements of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene. This study compared computed tomography (CT) imaging features in patients with ALK rearrangements and those with EGFR mutations. MATERIAL/ METHODS: 30 patients with ALK rearrangements were studied. 97 patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations were used as controls. Features assessed included size and location of thoracic lymphadenopathy, and the size, contour, consistency and location of the primary tumor. RESULTS: 127 lung adenocarcinomas were examined. 30 (24%) tumors harbored ALK rearrangements, 97 (76%) tumors harbored EGFR mutations. ALKtumors had larger thoracic lymphadenopathy than the control group (p=0.005). Both readers identified 17 (57%) patients in the ALK group with lymph nodes >1.5cm. Reader 1 identified 19 (20%) patients in the EGFR group with lymph nodes >1.5cm, and reader 2 identified 18 (19%) (kappa 0.969). Patients with ALK rearrangements were more likely to have multifocal lymphadenopathy. Reader 1 identified 22 (73%) ALKpatients versus 35 (36%) EGFRpatients with multifocal thoracic nodal enlargement, while reader 2 identified 20 (67%) ALKpatients versus 30 (31%) EGFRpatients (kappa 0.953). 92% of ALK positive lesions were solid. CONCLUSION:ALK positive lung adenocarcinomas are more likely than EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas to be associated with larger volume, multifocal thoracic lymphadenopathy. While routine testing for ALK should be standard, the presence of such characteristics in a solid tumor should further prompt testing for ALK rearrangement.
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Beow Y Yeap; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Subba R Digumarthy; Daniel B Costa; Rebecca S Heist; Benjamin Solomon; Hannah Stubbs; Sonal Admane; Ultan McDermott; Jeffrey Settleman; Susumu Kobayashi; Eugene J Mark; Scott J Rodig; Lucian R Chirieac; Eunice L Kwak; Thomas J Lynch; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-08-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Elizabeth Ward; Taylor Murray; Jiaquan Xu; Carol Smigal; Michael J Thun Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2006 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 508.702
Authors: Alice T Shaw; Dong-Wan Kim; Kazuhiko Nakagawa; Takashi Seto; Lucio Crinó; Myung-Ju Ahn; Tommaso De Pas; Benjamin Besse; Benjamin J Solomon; Fiona Blackhall; Yi-Long Wu; Michael Thomas; Kenneth J O'Byrne; Denis Moro-Sibilot; D Ross Camidge; Tony Mok; Vera Hirsh; Gregory J Riely; Shrividya Iyer; Vanessa Tassell; Anna Polli; Keith D Wilner; Pasi A Jänne Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-06-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: D Ross Camidge; Yung-Jue Bang; Eunice L Kwak; A John Iafrate; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Stephen B Fox; Gregory J Riely; Benjamin Solomon; Sai-Hong I Ou; Dong-Wan Kim; Ravi Salgia; Panagiotis Fidias; Jeffrey A Engelman; Leena Gandhi; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Patricia Lorusso; Katherine Ruffner; Patricia Stephenson; Yiyun Tang; Keith Wilner; Jeffrey W Clark; Alice T Shaw Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2012-09-04 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: S H McEvoy; D F Halpenny; A Viteri-Jusué; S A Hayes; A J Plodkowski; G J Riely; M S Ginsberg Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Andrew J Plodkowski; Alexander Drilon; Darragh F Halpenny; Dearbhail O'Driscoll; Donald Blair; Anya M Litvak; Junting Zheng; Chaya S Moskowitz; Michelle S Ginsberg Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2015-09-21 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: Harrison X Bai; Ashley M Lee; Li Yang; Paul Zhang; Christos Davatzikos; John M Maris; Sharon J Diskin Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-02-11 Impact factor: 3.039