Literature DB >> 25311868

Reducing radiation exposure during CRT implant procedures: early experience with a sensor-based navigation system.

Bernard Thibault1, Jason G Andrade, Marc Dubuc, Mario Talajic, Peter G Guerra, Katia Dyrda, Laurent Macle, Léna Rivard, Denis Roy, Blandine Mondésert, Paul Khairy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant procedures are often complex and prolonged, resulting in significant ionizing radiation (IR) exposure to the patient and operator. We report our early experience working with a novel sensor-based electromagnetic tracking system (MediGuide™, MDG, St. Jude Medical Inc., St. Paul, MN, USA), in terms of procedural IR exposure reduction. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Information regarding patient demographics, procedural details, procedural duration, and IR exposure were prospectively collected on 130 consecutive CRT procedures performed between January 2013 and January 2014. Sixty procedures were performed with MDG guidance, and 70 were performed without MDG guidance. Despite a nonsignificant trend toward shorter procedure duration with the use of MDG (120 minutes vs 138 minutes with non-MDG, P = 0.088), a 66% reduction in total IR exposure (median 769 μGray · m(2) vs 2,608 μGray · m(2), P < 0.001) was found. This reduction was primarily driven by a >90% reduction in IR dose required to cannulate the coronary sinus (median 80 μGray · m(2) vs 922 μGray · m(2), P < 0.001), and to a lesser extent from a reduction in IR dose required for LV lead placement (median 330 μGray·m(2) vs 737 μGray · m(2), P = 0.059). In addition, a significant learning curve effect was observed with a significantly shorter procedural duration for the last 15 cases compared to the first 15 cases (median 98 minutes vs 175 minutes, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: The nonfluoroscopic MDG positioning system is associated with a dramatic reduction in exposure to IR during CRT implant procedures, with a 90% decrease in the IR dose required to cannulate the coronary sinus. A steep learning curve was quantified. ©2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiac resynchronization therapy; fluoroscopy; radiation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25311868     DOI: 10.1111/pace.12522

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  5 in total

1.  The effectiveness of additional lead-shielding drape and low pulse rate fluoroscopy in protecting staff from scatter radiation during cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Authors:  Yoshiaki Morishima; Koichi Chida; Yoshiaki Katahira
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 2.374

2.  Effectiveness of a New Lead-Shielding Device and Additional Filter for Reducing Staff and Patient Radiation Exposure During Videofluoroscopic Swallowing Study Using a Human Phantom.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Morishima; Koichi Chida; Yoshikazu Muroya; Yoshiya Utsumi
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.438

3.  What is the most appropriate method for coronary sinus cannulation? The telescopic method or the electrophysiologic method?

Authors:  Hakan Gunes; Ekrem Aksu; Huseyin Nacar; Murat Kerkutluoglu; Handan Gunes; Sami Ozgul
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Peripheral Interventions Radiation Exposure Reduction Using a Sensor-Based Navigation System: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Philippe L L'Allier; Louis-Philippe Richer; Luke C McSpadden; Jean-François Dorval
Journal:  CJC Open       Date:  2021-10-20

5.  Comparison of Conventional versus Steerable-Catheter Guided Coronary Sinus Lead Positioning in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Device Implantation.

Authors:  Fikret Er; Dilek Yüksel; Martin Hellmich; Natig Gassanov
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.