Literature DB >> 11956419

Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study.

Peter Joseph1, A K Mandal, S K Singh, Purabi Mandal, S N Sankhwar, S K Sharma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the attenuation value of renal calculi on unenhanced axial computerized tomography (CT) images as a predictor of calculous fragmentation by extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) (Dornier Medical Systems, Inc., Marietta, Georgia).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We included 30 patients with renal calculi up to 20 mm. in this prospective study. Calculous attenuation value was measured in Hounsfield units on unenhanced CT sections through the calculi. Patients were subsequently treated with ESWL.
RESULTS: Patients were grouped according to calculous attenuation value as groups 1-less than 500, 2-500 to 1,000 and 3-greater than 1,000 Hounsfield units. Of the 30 patients 24 (80%) underwent successful treatment. The rate of stone clearance was 100% (12 of 12 cases) in group 1, 85.7% (6 of 7) in group 2 and 54.5% (6 of 11) in group 3. The success rate for stones with an attenuation value of greater than 1,000 Hounsfield units was significantly lower than that for stones with a value of less than 1,000 Hounsfield units (6 of 11 versus 18 of 19 cases, chi-square 7.07, p <0.01). Patients in group 3 required a greater median number of shock waves for stone fragmentation than those in groups 1 and 2 (7,300, 2,500, and 3,390, respectively). The mean attenuation value and number of shock waves required for calculous fragmentation correlated significantly (r = 0.779, p <0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The CT attenuation value of renal calculi can help to differentiate stones that are likely to fragment easily on ESWL from those that would require a greater number of shock waves for fragmentation or may fail to fragment on ESWL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11956419     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65064-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  44 in total

Review 1.  [Controversy on lower pole stones: monitor or intervene?].

Authors:  A Häcker; M S Michel
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Assessment of stone composition in the management of urinary stones.

Authors:  Kittinut Kijvikai; J J M de la Rosette
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 14.432

3.  CUA Guideline: Management of ureteral calculi.

Authors:  Michael Ordon; Sero Andonian; Brian Blew; Trevor Schuler; Ben Chew; Kenneth T Pace
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Evaluation of low-dose dual energy computed tomography for in vivo assessment of renal/ureteric calculus composition.

Authors:  Harshavardhan Mahalingam; Anupam Lal; Arup K Mandal; Shrawan Kumar Singh; Shalmoli Bhattacharyya; Niranjan Khandelwal
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-08-10

5.  Evaluation of possible predictive variables for the outcome of shock wave lithotripsy of renal stones.

Authors:  Yong Il Park; Ji Hyeong Yu; Luck Hee Sung; Chung Hee Noh; Jae Yong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-10-21

Review 6.  [Imaging techniques and their impact in treatment management of patients with acute flank pain].

Authors:  A Grosse; C A Grosse; J Mauermann; G Heinz-Peer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 7.  [Lower pole calyceal stones].

Authors:  U Nagele; T Knoll; D Schilling; M S Michel; A Stenzl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  [The future of ESWL].

Authors:  K U Köhrmann; D Neisius; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  The hounsfield unit value calculated with the aid of non-contrast computed tomography and its effect on the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Authors:  Alper Gok; Haci Polat; Ali Cift; Mehmet Ozgur Yucel; Bahri Gok; Mehmet Sirik; Can Benlioglu; Bedreddin Kalyenci
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 3.436

10.  Are Hounsfield densities of ureteral stones a predictive factor for effectiveness of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy?

Authors:  Basri Cakiroglu; S Erkan Eyyupoglu; Tuncay Tas; Mb Can Balci; Ismet Hazar; S Hilmi Aksoy; Orhun Sinanoglu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2014-05-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.