Addiction vulnerability and the processing of significant cues: Sign-, but not goal-, tracker perceptual sensitivity relies on cue salience.

The identification of broadly defined psychological traits that bestow vulnerability for the manifestation of addiction-like behaviors can guide the discovery of the neuronal mechanisms underlying the propensity for drug taking. Sign-tracking behavior in rats (STs) signifies the presence of a trait that predicts a relatively greater behavioral control of Pavlovian drug and reward cues than in rats that exhibit goal-tracking behavior (GTs). We previously demonstrated that relatively poor cholinergic-attentional control in STs is an essential component of the trait indexed by sign-tracking and that this trait aspect contributes to the relatively greater power of drug cues to control the behavior of STs. Here we addressed the possibility that STs and GTs employ fundamentally different psychological mechanisms for the detection of cues in attention-demanding contexts. Rats were trained to perform an operant Sustained Attention Task. As task training advanced to the stage that taxed attentional control, the relative brightness of visual target signals significantly influenced detection performance in STs but not GTs. This finding suggests that STs, but not GTs, rely on bottom-up, cue salience-driven mechanisms to detect cues. GTs may be able to resist behavioral control by Pavlovian drug cues by utilizing goal-directed decisional processes that minimize the influence of the salience of drug cues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).