OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether patients with low health literacy have higher emergency department (ED) utilization and higher ED recidivism than patients with adequate health literacy. METHODS: The study was conducted at an urban academic ED with more than 95,000 annual visits that is part of a 13-hospital health system, using electronic records that are captured in a central data repository. As part of a larger, cross-sectional, convenience sample study, health literacy testing was performed using the short test of functional health literacy in adults (S-TOFHLA) and standard test thresholds identifying those with inadequate, marginal, and adequate health literacy. The authors collected patients' demographic and clinical data, including items known to affect recidivism. This was a structured electronic record review directed at determining 1) the median number of total ED visits in this health system within a 2-year period and 2) the proportion of patients with each level of health literacy who had return visits within 3, 7, and 14 days of index visits. Descriptive data for demographics and ED returns are reported, stratified by health literacy level. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square was used to test whether there is an association between health literacy and ED recidivism. A negative binomial multivariable model was performed to examine whether health literacy affects ED use, including variables significant at the 0.1 alpha level on bivariate analysis and retaining those significant at an alpha of 0.05 in the final model. RESULTS: Among 431 patients evaluated, 13.2% had inadequate, 10% had marginal, and 76.3% had adequate health literacy as identified by S-TOFHLA. Patients with inadequate health literacy had higher ED utilization compared to those with adequate health literacy (p = 0.03). Variables retained in the final model included S-TOFHLA score, number of medications, having a personal doctor, being a property owner, race, insurance, age, and simple comorbidity score. During the study period, 118 unique patients each made at least one return ED visit within a 14-day period. The proportion of patients with inadequate health literacy making at least one return visit was higher than that of patients with adequate health literacy at 14 days, but was not significantly higher within 3 or 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, higher utilization of the ED by patients with inadequate health literacy when compared to those with adequate health literacy was observed. Patients with inadequate health literacy made a higher number of return visits at 14 days but not at 3 or 7 days.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether patients with low health literacy have higher emergency department (ED) utilization and higher ED recidivism than patients with adequate health literacy. METHODS: The study was conducted at an urban academic ED with more than 95,000 annual visits that is part of a 13-hospital health system, using electronic records that are captured in a central data repository. As part of a larger, cross-sectional, convenience sample study, health literacy testing was performed using the short test of functional health literacy in adults (S-TOFHLA) and standard test thresholds identifying those with inadequate, marginal, and adequate health literacy. The authors collected patients' demographic and clinical data, including items known to affect recidivism. This was a structured electronic record review directed at determining 1) the median number of total ED visits in this health system within a 2-year period and 2) the proportion of patients with each level of health literacy who had return visits within 3, 7, and 14 days of index visits. Descriptive data for demographics and ED returns are reported, stratified by health literacy level. The Mantel-Haenszel chi-square was used to test whether there is an association between health literacy and ED recidivism. A negative binomial multivariable model was performed to examine whether health literacy affects ED use, including variables significant at the 0.1 alpha level on bivariate analysis and retaining those significant at an alpha of 0.05 in the final model. RESULTS: Among 431 patients evaluated, 13.2% had inadequate, 10% had marginal, and 76.3% had adequate health literacy as identified by S-TOFHLA. Patients with inadequate health literacy had higher ED utilization compared to those with adequate health literacy (p = 0.03). Variables retained in the final model included S-TOFHLA score, number of medications, having a personal doctor, being a property owner, race, insurance, age, and simple comorbidity score. During the study period, 118 unique patients each made at least one return ED visit within a 14-day period. The proportion of patients with inadequate health literacy making at least one return visit was higher than that of patients with adequate health literacy at 14 days, but was not significantly higher within 3 or 7 days. CONCLUSIONS: In this single-center study, higher utilization of the ED by patients with inadequate health literacy when compared to those with adequate health literacy was observed. Patients with inadequate health literacy made a higher number of return visits at 14 days but not at 3 or 7 days.
Authors: Darren A Dewalt; Nancy D Berkman; Stacey Sheridan; Kathleen N Lohr; Michael P Pignone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Julius Cuong Pham; Thomas Dean Kirsch; Peter Michael Hill; Katherine DeRuggerio; Beatrice Hoffmann Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2011-04 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Michael A LaMantia; Timothy F Platts-Mills; Kevin Biese; Christine Khandelwal; Cory Forbach; Charles B Cairns; Jan Busby-Whitehead; John S Kizer Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Martha Okafor; Glenda Wrenn; Victor Ede; Nana Wilson; William Custer; Emile Risby; Michael Claeys; Frank E Shelp; Hany Atallah; Gail Mattox; David Satcher Journal: Community Ment Health J Date: 2015-12-28
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Candace D McNaughton; Danielle M McCarthy; Erica Shelton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Angela Young-Brinn; Donna Fowler; Corita Grudszen Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2016-11-25 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Janet Papadakos; Anna D'souza; Adeline Masse; Susan Boyko; Susan Clarke; Meredith Giuliani; Keira MacKinnon; Sarah McBain; Meg McCallum; Jan MacVinnie; Tina Papadakos Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2019-08 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Xuan Rong Tang; Faraz Zarisfi; Pin Pin Pek; Fahad Javaid Siddiqui; Rahul Malhotra; Yu Heng Kwan; Tiah Ling; Andrew Fu Wah Ho; Marcus Eng Hock Ong Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-06-03 Impact factor: 3.752
Authors: Miyong T Kim; Kim B Kim; Jisook Ko; Nicole Murry; Bo Xie; Kavita Radhakrishnan; Hae-Ra Han Journal: Nurs Res Date: 2020 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.381
Authors: Margaret E Samuels-Kalow; Mohammad K Faridi; Janice A Espinola; Jean E Klig; Carlos A Camargo Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Deena J Chisolm; Hannah E Keedy; Laura C Hart; Laura J Chavez; Millie Dolce; Jennifer Morack; Connor Grannis; Kelly Kelleher Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2021-05-02 Impact factor: 7.830