Jill Boylston Herndon1, Michelle Chaney, Donna Carden. 1. Department of Health Outcomes and Policy and Institute for Child Health Policy, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. jbh@ichp.ufl.edu
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess emergency department (ED) patients' health literacy, the readability of ED patient materials, and the relationship between health literacy and ED outcomes through a systematic literature review. METHODS: PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, and ERIC were searched for studies published January 1, 1980, to July 15, 2010, conducted in the United States, reporting original data, and measuring ED patients' health literacy, the readability of ED materials, or the association between health literacy and ED-related outcomes. Two reviewers evaluated each study and abstracted information from included studies into evidence tables. RESULTS: We identified 413 articles, and 31 met inclusion criteria. Collectively, health literacy skills were assessed at or below the eighth-grade level for approximately 40% of ED patients. In contrast, ED patient materials were typically assessed at or above the ninth-grade level. Studies of adults aged 65 years and older found that those with lower health literacy were more likely to use the ED and incur higher ED costs. Studies of pediatric ED patients did not find direct effects of caregiver literacy on ED outcomes. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of ED patients have limited health literacy, and ED materials are typically too complex for these patients. It is important for EDs to evaluate the accessibility and patient understanding of information presented. The evidence linking health literacy to ED outcomes is limited. Additional research is needed to better understand the relationship between health literacy and ED outcomes.
STUDY OBJECTIVE: We assess emergency department (ED) patients' health literacy, the readability of ED patient materials, and the relationship between health literacy and ED outcomes through a systematic literature review. METHODS: PubMed, PsychInfo, CINAHL, Web of Knowledge, and ERIC were searched for studies published January 1, 1980, to July 15, 2010, conducted in the United States, reporting original data, and measuring ED patients' health literacy, the readability of ED materials, or the association between health literacy and ED-related outcomes. Two reviewers evaluated each study and abstracted information from included studies into evidence tables. RESULTS: We identified 413 articles, and 31 met inclusion criteria. Collectively, health literacy skills were assessed at or below the eighth-grade level for approximately 40% of ED patients. In contrast, ED patient materials were typically assessed at or above the ninth-grade level. Studies of adults aged 65 years and older found that those with lower health literacy were more likely to use the ED and incur higher ED costs. Studies of pediatric ED patients did not find direct effects of caregiver literacy on ED outcomes. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of ED patients have limited health literacy, and ED materials are typically too complex for these patients. It is important for EDs to evaluate the accessibility and patient understanding of information presented. The evidence linking health literacy to ED outcomes is limited. Additional research is needed to better understand the relationship between health literacy and ED outcomes.
Authors: Christopher R Carpenter; Kimberly A Kaphingst; Melody S Goodman; Margaret J Lin; Andrew T Melson; Richard T Griffey Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Maria C Mora-Pinzon; Elizabeth A Chrischilles; Robert T Greenlee; Laurel Hoeth; John M Hampton; Maureen A Smith; Bradley D McDowell; Lee G Wilke; Amy Trentham-Dietz Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Mark D Macek; Kathryn A Atchison; Haiyan Chen; William Wells; Don Haynes; Ruth M Parker; Shurouk Azzo Journal: Community Dent Oral Epidemiol Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 3.383
Authors: Mariano E Menendez; Bastiaan T van Hoorn; Michael Mackert; Erin E Donovan; Neal C Chen; David Ring Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2016-10-28 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Andrew T Melson; Margaret J Lin; Christopher R Carpenter; Melody S Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Fatima Al Sayah; Sumit R Majumdar; Beverly Williams; Sandy Robertson; Jeffrey A Johnson Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2012-10-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Richard T Griffey; Nicole Shin; Solita Jones; Nnenna Aginam; Maureen Gross; Yonitte Kinsella; Jennifer A Williams; Christopher R Carpenter; Melody Goodman; Kimberly A Kaphingst Journal: J Commun Healthc Date: 2015-03
Authors: Jia-Rong Wu; George M Holmes; Darren A DeWalt; Aurelia Macabasco-O'Connell; Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; Bernice Ruo; David W Baker; Dean Schillinger; Morris Weinberger; Kimberly A Broucksou; Brian Erman; Christine D Jones; Crystal W Cene; Michael Pignone Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2013-03-12 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Andrea K Morrison; Matthew P Myrvik; David C Brousseau; Raymond G Hoffmann; Rachel M Stanley Journal: Acad Pediatr Date: 2013-03-05 Impact factor: 3.107