Literature DB >> 17926295

Does prey capture induce area-restricted search? A fine-scale study using GPS in a marine predator, the wandering albatross.

Henri Weimerskirch1, David Pinaud, Frédéric Pawlowski, Charles-André Bost.   

Abstract

In a patchy environment, predators are expected to increase turning rate and start an area-restricted search (ARS) when prey have been encountered, but few empirical data exist for large predators. By using GPS loggers with devices measuring prey capture, we studied how a marine predator adjusts foraging movements at various scales in relation to prey capture. Wandering albatrosses use two tactics, sit and wait and foraging in flight, the former tactic being three times less efficient than the latter. During flight foraging, birds caught large isolated prey and used ARS at scales varying from 5 to 90 km, with large-scale ARS being used only by young animals. Birds did not show strong responses to prey capture at a large scale, few ARS events occurred after prey capture, and birds did not have high rates of prey capture in ARS. Only at small scales did birds increase sinuosity after prey captures for a limited time period, and this occurred only after they had caught a large prey item within an ARS zone. When this species searches over a large scale, the most effective search rule was to follow a nearly straight path. ARS may be used to restrict search to a particular environment where prey capture is more predictable and profitable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17926295     DOI: 10.1086/522059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  60 in total

1.  Foraging success of biological Lévy flights recorded in situ.

Authors:  Nicolas E Humphries; Henri Weimerskirch; Nuno Queiroz; Emily J Southall; David W Sims
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Distinguishing technology from biology: a critical review of the use of GPS telemetry data in ecology.

Authors:  Mark Hebblewhite; Daniel T Haydon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Optimal foraging: Lévy pattern or process?

Authors:  M J Plank; A James
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Fractal reorientation clocks: Linking animal behavior to statistical patterns of search.

Authors:  Frederic Bartumeus; Simon A Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Do naive juvenile seabirds forage differently from adults?

Authors:  Louise Riotte-Lambert; Henri Weimerskirch
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Optimizing the use of biologgers for movement ecology research.

Authors:  Hannah J Williams; Lucy A Taylor; Simon Benhamou; Allert I Bijleveld; Thomas A Clay; Sophie de Grissac; Urška Demšar; Holly M English; Novella Franconi; Agustina Gómez-Laich; Rachael C Griffiths; William P Kay; Juan Manuel Morales; Jonathan R Potts; Katharine F Rogerson; Christian Rutz; Anouk Spelt; Alice M Trevail; Rory P Wilson; Luca Börger
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Relationship between reversed sexual dimorphism, breeding investment and foraging ecology in a pelagic seabird, the masked booby.

Authors:  Henri Weimerskirch; Matthieu Le Corre; Hélène Gadenne; David Pinaud; Akiko Kato; Yan Ropert-Coudert; Charles-André Bost
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-06-21       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  The use of odors at different spatial scales: comparing birds with fish.

Authors:  Jennifer L DeBose; Gabrielle A Nevitt
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 2.626

9.  Linking animal movement to site fidelity.

Authors:  Luca Giuggioli; Frederic Bartumeus
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-06-02       Impact factor: 2.259

10.  Mechanistic analysis of the search behaviour of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Liliana C M Salvador; Frederic Bartumeus; Simon A Levin; William S Ryu
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.118

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.