Literature DB >> 25305728

Removal of annexin V-positive sperm cells for intracytoplasmic sperm injection in ovum donation cycles does not improve reproductive outcome: a controlled and randomized trial in unselected males.

Laura Romany1, Nicolás Garrido2, Yamileth Motato2, Belén Aparicio2, José Remohí2, Marcos Meseguer2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of removing presumptive apoptotic sperm cells from samples from unselected males by means of magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) on live-birth delivery rates after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) in couples undergoing ovum donation (OD).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, triple-blinded, and controlled study.
SETTING: Private university-affiliated IVF center. PATIENT(S): A total of 237 infertile couples undergoing ICSI as part of an OD program. INTERVENTION(S): Semen specimens from the control group were prepared by swim-up. Samples from the study group were prepared by swim-up followed by MACS and incubation with annexin V-conjugated microbeads to remove annexin V-positive (AV+) sperm cells. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Fertilization rates, morphological features of early embryo development, implantation rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live-birth rates. RESULT(S): Similar results were obtained between groups for all the parameters compared: fertilization rates of 75.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 71.6-78.9) versus 72.1% (95% CI, 68.6-75.7); percentage of good-quality embryos on day 2 of 53.7% (95% CI, 50.3-57.1) versus 51.8% (95% CI, 48.3-55.3) and on day 3 of 54.2% (95% CI, 50.7-57.6) versus 48.9% (95% CI, 45.3-52.4); implantation rates of 42.2% (95% CI, 33.8-48.1) versus 40.1% (95% CI, 34.8-49.6); positive beta-hCG tests of 63.2% (95% CI, 54.7-71.6) versus 68.6% (95% CI, 60.2-76.9), and live-birth rates of 48.4% (95% CI, 39.6-57.1) versus 56.4% (95% CI, 47.3-65.5) in the MACS versus control group. None of the differences reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION(S): Applying MACS technology to remove AV+ sperm cells from unselected males does not improve the reproductive outcome of ICSI in OD.
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic activated cell sorting, MACS; apoptotic sperm; live birth rate; ovum donation; sperm selection

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25305728     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  13 in total

Review 1.  Advanced sperm selection techniques for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Sam Lepine; Simon McDowell; Leigh M Searle; Ben Kroon; Demián Glujovsky; Anusch Yazdani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-30

2.  Obstetric and perinatal outcome of babies born from sperm selected by MACS from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Laura Romany; Nicolas Garrido; Ana Cobo; Belen Aparicio-Ruiz; Vicente Serra; Marcos Meseguer
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Magnetic-activated cell sorting of non-apoptotic spermatozoa improves the quality of embryos according to female age: a prospective sibling oocyte study.

Authors:  Martin Stimpfel; Ivan Verdenik; Branko Zorn; Irma Virant-Klun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Does combining magnetic-activated cell sorting with density gradient or swim-up improve sperm selection?

Authors:  Zeynep Cakar; Burcu Cetinkaya; Duru Aras; Betül Koca; Sinan Ozkavukcu; İskender Kaplanoglu; Alp Can; Ozgur Cinar
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-28       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Effect of sperm selection methods on ICSI outcomes in patients with oligoteratzoospermia.

Authors:  Masomeh Rezaei; Bahram Nikkhoo; Borhan Moradveisi; Azra Allahveisi
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2021-04-15

Review 6.  Simulating nature in sperm selection for assisted reproduction.

Authors:  Erica T Y Leung; Cheuk-Lun Lee; Xinyi Tian; Kevin K W Lam; Raymond H W Li; Ernest H Y Ng; William S B Yeung; Philip C N Chiu
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Switching to testicular sperm after a previous ICSI failure with ejaculated sperm significantly improves blastocyst quality without increasing aneuploidy risk.

Authors:  Irene Hervas; Maria Gil Julia; Rocío Rivera-Egea; Ana Navarro-Gomezlechon; Laura Mossetti; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 3.357

Review 8.  Novel Techniques of Sperm Selection for Improving IVF and ICSI Outcomes.

Authors:  Iván Oseguera-López; Sara Ruiz-Díaz; Priscila Ramos-Ibeas; Serafín Pérez-Cerezales
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2019-11-29

9.  Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting (MACS): A Useful Sperm-Selection Technique in Cases of High Levels of Sperm DNA Fragmentation.

Authors:  Alberto Pacheco; Arancha Blanco; Fernando Bronet; María Cruz; Jaime García-Fernández; Juan Antonio García-Velasco
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Sperm Selection by Magnetic-Activated Cell Sorting before Microinjection of Autologous Oocytes Increases Cumulative Live Birth Rates with Limited Clinical Impact: A Retrospective Study in Unselected Males.

Authors:  María Gil Juliá; Irene Hervás; Ana Navarro-Gómez Lechón; Fernando Quintana; David Amorós; Alberto Pacheco; Cristina González-Ravina; Rocío Rivera-Egea; Nicolás Garrido
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.