Literature DB >> 25304947

Secondary analysis of RTOG 9508, a phase 3 randomized trial of whole-brain radiation therapy versus WBRT plus stereotactic radiosurgery in patients with 1-3 brain metastases; poststratified by the graded prognostic assessment (GPA).

Paul W Sperduto1, Ryan Shanley2, Xianghua Luo3, David Andrews4, Maria Werner-Wasik5, Richard Valicenti6, Jean-Paul Bahary7, Luis Souhami8, Minhee Won9, Minesh Mehta10.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9508 showed a survival advantage for patients with 1 but not 2 or 3 brain metastasis (BM) treated with whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus WBRT alone. An improved prognostic index, the graded prognostic assessment (GPA) has been developed. Our hypothesis was that if the data from RTOG 9508 were poststratified by the GPA, the conclusions may vary. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this analysis, 252 of the 331 patients were evaluable by GPA. Of those, 211 had lung cancer. Breast cancer patients were excluded because the components of the breast GPA are not in the RTOG database. Multiple Cox regression was used to compare survival between treatment groups, adjusting for GPA. Treatment comparisons within subgroups were performed with the log-rank test. A free online tool (brainmetgpa.com) simplified GPA use.
RESULTS: The fundamental conclusions of the primary analysis were confirmed in that there was no survival benefit overall for patients with 1 to 3 metastases; however, there was a benefit for the subset of patients with GPA 3.5 to 4.0 (median survival time [MST] for WBRT + SRS vs WBRT alone was 21.0 versus 10.3 months, P=.05) regardless of the number of metastases. Among patients with GPA 3.5 to 4.0 treated with WBRT and SRS, the MST for patients with 1 versus 2 to 3 metastases was 21 and 14.1 months, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: This secondary analysis of predominantly lung cancer patients, consistent with the original analysis, shows no survival advantage for the group overall when treated with WBRT and SRS; however, in patients with high GPA (3.5-4), there is a survival advantage regardless of whether they have 1, 2, or 3 BM. This benefit did not extend to patients with lower GPA. Prospective validation of this survival benefit for patients with multiple BM and high GPA when treated with WBRT and SRS is warranted.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304947      PMCID: PMC4700538          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  25 in total

1.  Effect of tumor subtype on survival and the graded prognostic assessment for patients with breast cancer and brain metastases.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Norbert Kased; David Roberge; Zhiyuan Xu; Ryan Shanley; Xianghua Luo; Penny K Sneed; Samuel T Chao; Robert J Weil; John Suh; Amit Bhatt; Ashley W Jensen; Paul D Brown; Helen A Shih; John Kirkpatrick; Laurie E Gaspar; John B Fiveash; Veronica Chiang; Jonathan P S Knisely; Christina Maria Sperduto; Nancy Lin; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 2.  Why avoid the hippocampus? A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Wolfgang A Tomé; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Summary report on the graded prognostic assessment: an accurate and facile diagnosis-specific tool to estimate survival for patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Norbert Kased; David Roberge; Zhiyuan Xu; Ryan Shanley; Xianghua Luo; Penny K Sneed; Samuel T Chao; Robert J Weil; John Suh; Amit Bhatt; Ashley W Jensen; Paul D Brown; Helen A Shih; John Kirkpatrick; Laurie E Gaspar; John B Fiveash; Veronica Chiang; Jonathan P S Knisely; Christina Maria Sperduto; Nancy Lin; Minesh Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Estimated risk of perihippocampal disease progression after hippocampal avoidance during whole-brain radiotherapy: safety profile for RTOG 0933.

Authors:  Vinai Gondi; Wolfgang A Tome; James Marsh; Aaron Struck; Amol Ghia; Julius V Turian; Søren M Bentzen; John S Kuo; Deepak Khuntia; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Prognostic indexes for brain metastases: which is the most powerful?

Authors:  Gustavo Arruda Viani; Lucas Godói Bernardes da Silva; Eduardo Jose Stefano
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Impact of non-small cell lung cancer histology on survival predicted from the graded prognostic assessment for patients with brain metastases.

Authors:  Susan Guo; Chandana A Reddy; Samuel T Chao; John H Suh; Gene H Barnett; Michael A Vogelbaum; Gregory M Videtic
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Institutional, retrospective analysis of 777 patients with brain metastases: treatment outcomes and diagnosis-specific prognostic factors.

Authors:  Delphine Antoni; Jean-Baptiste Clavier; Marius Pop; Catherine Schumacher; François Lefebvre; Georges Noël
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2013-04-11       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Validation of Recursive Partitioning Analysis and Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment in patients treated initially with radiosurgery alone.

Authors:  Anna Likhacheva; Chelsea C Pinnix; Neil Parikh; Pamela K Allen; Nandita Guha-Thakurta; Mary McAleer; Erik P Sulman; Anita Mahajan; Almon Shiu; Dershan Luo; Max Chiu; Paul D Brown; Sujit S Prabhu; Eric L Chang
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  Diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment score is valid in patients with brain metastases treated in routine clinical practice in two European countries.

Authors:  Carsten Nieder; Nicolaus H Andratschke; Hans Geinitz; Anca L Grosu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-07

10.  Validation of the new Graded Prognostic Assessment scale for brain metastases: a multicenter prospective study.

Authors:  Salvador Villà; Damien C Weber; Cristina Moretones; Anabel Mañes; Christophe Combescure; Josep Jové; Paloma Puyalto; Patricia Cuadras; Jordi Bruna; Eugènia Verger; Carme Balañà; Francesc Graus
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 3.481

View more
  49 in total

1.  [Is surgery and radiosurgery as effective as surgery and whole-brain radiotherapy only in brain recurrences in terms of overall survival and intracerebral tumor control in patients with 1-4 brain metastases?]

Authors:  Gunther Klautke
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for small to medium-sized brain metastases are exceptionally dependent upon tumor size and prescribed dose.

Authors:  Fabio Y Moraes; Jeff Winter; Eshetu G Atenafu; Archya Dasgupta; Hamid Raziee; Catherine Coolens; Barbara-Ann Millar; Normand Laperriere; Maitry Patel; Mark Bernstein; Paul Kongkham; Gelareh Zadeh; Tatiana Conrad; Caroline Chung; Alejandro Berlin; David B Shultz
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 3.  Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT and radiosurgery for the treatment of brain metastases.

Authors:  Chirag G Patil; Katie Pricola; J Manuel Sarmiento; Sachin K Garg; Andrew Bryant; Keith L Black
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-09-25

4.  Can we omit radiotherapy in case of brain metastases for patients with mutant EGFR lung adenocarcinoma?

Authors:  Paul Jules Van Houtte; Daniel Devriendt
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2017-12

5.  Salvage whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery after initial stereotactic radiosurgery for 1-4 brain metastases.

Authors:  Yufei Liu; Brian M Alexander; Yu-Hui Chen; Margaret C Horvath; Ayal A Aizer; Elizabeth B Claus; Ian F Dunn; Alexandra J Golby; Mark D Johnson; Scott Friesen; Edward G Mannarino; Matthew Wagar; Fred L Hacker; Nils D Arvold
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 6.  Current Treatment Options for Breast Cancer Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Arrvind Raghunath; Kunal Desai; Manmeet S Ahluwalia
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-02-15

7.  The Effect of Gene Alterations and Tyrosine Kinase Inhibition on Survival and Cause of Death in Patients With Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; T Jonathan Yang; Kathryn Beal; Hubert Pan; Paul D Brown; Ananta Bangdiwala; Ryan Shanley; Norman Yeh; Laurie E Gaspar; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; John Boyle; John P Kirkpatrick; Kimberley S Mak; Helen A Shih; Alex Engelman; David Roberge; Nils D Arvold; Brian Alexander; Mark M Awad; Joseph Contessa; Veronica Chiang; John Hardie; Daniel Ma; Emil Lou; William Sperduto; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  The treatment of patients with 1-3 brain metastases: is there a place for whole brain radiotherapy alone, yet? A retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Michela Buglione; Sara Pedretti; Stefano Gipponi; Luciano Buttolo; Paolo Panciani; Pietro Luigi Poliani; Roberto Liserre; Paolo Borghetti; Ludovica Pegurri; Loredana Costa; Luca Triggiani; Nadia Pasinetti; Paolo Ghirardelli; Sara Pandini; Alessandro Padovani; Stefano Maria Magrini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell H Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; Yi An; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Efficacy, safety and outcome of frameless image-guided robotic radiosurgery for brain metastases after whole brain radiotherapy.

Authors:  Laura-Nanna Lohkamp; Peter Vajkoczy; Volker Budach; Markus Kufeld
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.