Literature DB >> 21497451

Effect of tumor subtype on survival and the graded prognostic assessment for patients with breast cancer and brain metastases.

Paul W Sperduto1, Norbert Kased, David Roberge, Zhiyuan Xu, Ryan Shanley, Xianghua Luo, Penny K Sneed, Samuel T Chao, Robert J Weil, John Suh, Amit Bhatt, Ashley W Jensen, Paul D Brown, Helen A Shih, John Kirkpatrick, Laurie E Gaspar, John B Fiveash, Veronica Chiang, Jonathan P S Knisely, Christina Maria Sperduto, Nancy Lin, Minesh Mehta.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) was published to clarify prognosis for patients with brain metastases. This study refines the existing Breast-GPA by analyzing a larger cohort and tumor subtype. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional retrospective database of 400 breast cancer patients treated for newly diagnosed brain metastases was generated. Prognostic factors significant for survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Factors were weighted by the magnitude of their regression coefficients to define the GPA index.
RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors by multivariate Cox regression and RPA were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), HER2, ER/PR status, and the interaction between ER/PR and HER2. RPA showed age was significant for patients with KPS 60 to 80. The median survival time (MST) overall was 13.8 months, and for GPA scores of 0 to 1.0, 1.5 to 2.0, 2.5 to 3.0, and 3.5 to 4.0 were 3.4 (n = 23), 7.7 (n = 104), 15.1 (n = 140), and 25.3 (n = 133) months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Among HER2-negative patients, being ER/PR positive improved MST from 6.4 to 9.7 months, whereas in HER2-positive patients, being ER/PR positive improved MST from 17.9 to 20.7 months. The log-rank statistic (predictive power) was 110 for the Breast-GPA vs. 55 for tumor subtype.
CONCLUSIONS: The Breast-GPA documents wide variation in prognosis and shows clear separation between subgroups of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This tool will aid clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials. These data confirm the effect of tumor subtype on survival and show the Breast-GPA offers significantly more predictive power than the tumor subtype alone. Copyright Â
© 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21497451      PMCID: PMC3172400          DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.02.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  49 in total

1.  Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of prognostic factors in three Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) brain metastases trials.

Authors:  L Gaspar; C Scott; M Rotman; S Asbell; T Phillips; T Wasserman; W G McKenna; R Byhardt
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1997-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Incidence proportions of brain metastases in patients diagnosed (1973 to 2001) in the Metropolitan Detroit Cancer Surveillance System.

Authors:  Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Andrew E Sloan; Faith G Davis; Fawn D Vigneau; Ping Lai; Raymond E Sawaya
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases from breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Alexander Muacevic; Friedrich W Kreth; Jörg-Christian Tonn; Berndt Wowra
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2004-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Phase I/II trial of accelerated fractionation in brain metastases RTOG 85-28.

Authors:  W T Sause; C Scott; R Krisch; M Rotman; P K Sneed; N Janjan; L Davis; W Curran; K N Choi; H Selim
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1993-07-15       Impact factor: 7.038

5.  Central nervous system metastases in women who receive trastuzumab-based therapy for metastatic breast carcinoma.

Authors:  Johanna C Bendell; Susan M Domchek; Harold J Burstein; Lyndsay Harris; Jerry Younger; Irene Kuter; Craig Bunnell; Montse Rue; Rebecca Gelman; Eric Winer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Survival of patients with metastatic breast carcinoma: importance of prognostic markers of the primary tumor.

Authors:  Jenny Chang; Gary M Clark; D Craig Allred; Syed Mohsin; Gary Chamness; Richard M Elledge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Results of a randomized comparison of radiotherapy and bromodeoxyuridine with radiotherapy alone for brain metastases: report of RTOG trial 89-05.

Authors:  T L Phillips; C B Scott; S A Leibel; M Rotman; I J Weigensberg
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1995-09-30       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Intracerebral metastases in solid-tumor patients: natural history and results of treatment.

Authors:  S Zimm; G L Wampler; D Stablein; T Hazra; H F Young
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1981-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  A randomized phase III protocol for the evaluation of misonidazole combined with radiation in the treatment of patients with brain metastases (RTOG-7916).

Authors:  L T Komarnicky; T L Phillips; K Martz; S Asbell; S Isaacson; R Urtasun
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  Survival of patients with nonseminomatous germ cell cancer: a review of the IGCC classification by Cox regression and recursive partitioning.

Authors:  M R van Dijk; E W Steyerberg; S P Stenning; E Dusseldorp; J D F Habbema
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-03-22       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  120 in total

1.  [Radiotherapy and re-irradiation of breast cancer patients with brain metastases: Survival in the trastuzumab era].

Authors:  C Nieder
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Hepatocellular carcinoma specific graded prognostic assessment can predict outcomes for patients with brain metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Seungtaek Lim; Soohyeon Lee; Jae Yun Lim; Ji Soo Park; Jin Sil Seong; Won Seok Chang; Kwang-Hyub Han; Hye Jin Choi
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-07-26       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 3.  Unsanctifying the sanctuary: challenges and opportunities with brain metastases.

Authors:  Shannon Puhalla; William Elmquist; David Freyer; Lawrence Kleinberg; Chris Adkins; Paul Lockman; John McGregor; Leslie Muldoon; Gary Nesbit; David Peereboom; Quentin Smith; Sara Walker; Edward Neuwelt
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 12.300

4.  Is there a benefit to locally consolidative therapy for oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer?

Authors:  Lauren Boreta; Sue S Yom
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-03

5.  Survival and prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal cancers and brain metastases: have we made progress?

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Penny Fang; Jing Li; William Breen; Paul D Brown; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Brent Cameron; Albert Attia; Jason Molitoris; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; Natalie Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Jessica Parkhurst; John M Buatti; Ryan Shanley; Emil Lou; Daniel D Tandberg; John P Kirkpatrick; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Michael Chuong; Hirotake Saito; Hidefumi Aoyama; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Transl Res       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 7.012

6.  The breast graded prognostic assessment is associated with the survival outcomes in breast cancer patients receiving whole brain re-irradiation.

Authors:  Shih-Fan Lai; Yu-Hsuan Chen; Tony Hsiang-Kuang Liang; Che-Yu Hsu; Huang-Chun Lien; Yen-Sen Lu; Chiun-Sheng Huang; Sung-Hsin Kuo
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Validity of two recently-proposed prognostic grading indices for lung, gastro-intestinal, breast and renal cell cancer patients with radiosurgically-treated brain metastases.

Authors:  Masaaki Yamamoto; Toru Serizawa; Yasunori Sato; Takuya Kawabe; Yoshinori Higuchi; Osamu Nagano; Bierta E Barfod; Junichi Ono; Hidetoshi Kasuya; Yoichi Urakawa
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2012-12-09       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  Survival in Patients With Brain Metastases: Summary Report on the Updated Diagnosis-Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment and Definition of the Eligibility Quotient.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell H Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; Yi An; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Characteristics and Outcomes of Patients With Breast Cancer With Leptomeningeal Metastasis.

Authors:  Aki Morikawa; Lilly Jordan; Raquel Rozner; Sujata Patil; Adrienne Boire; Elena Pentsova; Andrew D Seidman
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-07-25       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Breast cancer subtype as a predictor for outcomes and control in the setting of brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Christopher S Grubb; Ashish Jani; Cheng-Chia Wu; Shumaila Saad; Yasir H Qureshi; Tavish Nanda; Andrew Yaeh; Tzlil Rozenblat; Michael B Sisti; Jeffrey N Bruce; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Jeraldine Lesser; Simon K Cheng; Steven R Isaacson; Andrew B Lassman; Eileen P Connolly; Tony J C Wang
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.130

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.