PURPOSE: The diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) was published to clarify prognosis for patients with brain metastases. This study refines the existing Breast-GPA by analyzing a larger cohort and tumor subtype. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional retrospective database of 400 breast cancer patients treated for newly diagnosed brain metastases was generated. Prognostic factors significant for survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Factors were weighted by the magnitude of their regression coefficients to define the GPA index. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors by multivariate Cox regression and RPA were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), HER2, ER/PR status, and the interaction between ER/PR and HER2. RPA showed age was significant for patients with KPS 60 to 80. The median survival time (MST) overall was 13.8 months, and for GPA scores of 0 to 1.0, 1.5 to 2.0, 2.5 to 3.0, and 3.5 to 4.0 were 3.4 (n = 23), 7.7 (n = 104), 15.1 (n = 140), and 25.3 (n = 133) months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Among HER2-negative patients, being ER/PR positive improved MST from 6.4 to 9.7 months, whereas in HER2-positive patients, being ER/PR positive improved MST from 17.9 to 20.7 months. The log-rank statistic (predictive power) was 110 for the Breast-GPA vs. 55 for tumor subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The Breast-GPA documents wide variation in prognosis and shows clear separation between subgroups of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This tool will aid clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials. These data confirm the effect of tumor subtype on survival and show the Breast-GPA offers significantly more predictive power than the tumor subtype alone. Copyright Â
PURPOSE: The diagnosis-specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (GPA) was published to clarify prognosis for patients with brain metastases. This study refines the existing Breast-GPA by analyzing a larger cohort and tumor subtype. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multi-institutional retrospective database of 400 breast cancerpatients treated for newly diagnosed brain metastases was generated. Prognostic factors significant for survival were analyzed by multivariate Cox regression and recursive partitioning analysis (RPA). Factors were weighted by the magnitude of their regression coefficients to define the GPA index. RESULTS: Significant prognostic factors by multivariate Cox regression and RPA were Karnofsky performance status (KPS), HER2, ER/PR status, and the interaction between ER/PR and HER2. RPA showed age was significant for patients with KPS 60 to 80. The median survival time (MST) overall was 13.8 months, and for GPA scores of 0 to 1.0, 1.5 to 2.0, 2.5 to 3.0, and 3.5 to 4.0 were 3.4 (n = 23), 7.7 (n = 104), 15.1 (n = 140), and 25.3 (n = 133) months, respectively (p < 0.0001). Among HER2-negative patients, being ER/PR positive improved MST from 6.4 to 9.7 months, whereas in HER2-positivepatients, being ER/PR positive improved MST from 17.9 to 20.7 months. The log-rank statistic (predictive power) was 110 for the Breast-GPA vs. 55 for tumor subtype. CONCLUSIONS: The Breast-GPA documents wide variation in prognosis and shows clear separation between subgroups of patients with breast cancer and brain metastases. This tool will aid clinical decision making and stratification in clinical trials. These data confirm the effect of tumor subtype on survival and show the Breast-GPA offers significantly more predictive power than the tumor subtype alone. Copyright Â
Authors: L Gaspar; C Scott; M Rotman; S Asbell; T Phillips; T Wasserman; W G McKenna; R Byhardt Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1997-03-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Andrew E Sloan; Faith G Davis; Fawn D Vigneau; Ping Lai; Raymond E Sawaya Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-07-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W T Sause; C Scott; R Krisch; M Rotman; P K Sneed; N Janjan; L Davis; W Curran; K N Choi; H Selim Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1993-07-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Johanna C Bendell; Susan M Domchek; Harold J Burstein; Lyndsay Harris; Jerry Younger; Irene Kuter; Craig Bunnell; Montse Rue; Rebecca Gelman; Eric Winer Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Jenny Chang; Gary M Clark; D Craig Allred; Syed Mohsin; Gary Chamness; Richard M Elledge Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-02-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: L T Komarnicky; T L Phillips; K Martz; S Asbell; S Isaacson; R Urtasun Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1991-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Seungtaek Lim; Soohyeon Lee; Jae Yun Lim; Ji Soo Park; Jin Sil Seong; Won Seok Chang; Kwang-Hyub Han; Hye Jin Choi Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2014-07-26 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Shannon Puhalla; William Elmquist; David Freyer; Lawrence Kleinberg; Chris Adkins; Paul Lockman; John McGregor; Leslie Muldoon; Gary Nesbit; David Peereboom; Quentin Smith; Sara Walker; Edward Neuwelt Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2015-05 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Penny Fang; Jing Li; William Breen; Paul D Brown; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; James Yu; Veronica Chiang; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Sten Myrehaug; Arjun Sahgal; Steve Braunstein; Penny Sneed; Brent Cameron; Albert Attia; Jason Molitoris; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; Natalie Lockney; Kathryn Beal; Jessica Parkhurst; John M Buatti; Ryan Shanley; Emil Lou; Daniel D Tandberg; John P Kirkpatrick; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Michael Chuong; Hirotake Saito; Hidefumi Aoyama; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Minesh P Mehta Journal: Transl Res Date: 2019-02-27 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Paul W Sperduto; Shane Mesko; Jing Li; Daniel Cagney; Ayal Aizer; Nancy U Lin; Eric Nesbit; Tim J Kruser; Jason Chan; Steve Braunstein; Jessica Lee; John P Kirkpatrick; Will Breen; Paul D Brown; Diana Shi; Helen A Shih; Hany Soliman; Arjun Sahgal; Ryan Shanley; William A Sperduto; Emil Lou; Ashlyn Everett; Drexell H Boggs; Laura Masucci; David Roberge; Jill Remick; Kristin Plichta; John M Buatti; Supriya Jain; Laurie E Gaspar; Cheng-Chia Wu; Tony J C Wang; John Bryant; Michael Chuong; Yi An; Veronica Chiang; Toshimichi Nakano; Hidefumi Aoyama; Minesh P Mehta Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Aki Morikawa; Lilly Jordan; Raquel Rozner; Sujata Patil; Adrienne Boire; Elena Pentsova; Andrew D Seidman Journal: Clin Breast Cancer Date: 2016-07-25 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Christopher S Grubb; Ashish Jani; Cheng-Chia Wu; Shumaila Saad; Yasir H Qureshi; Tavish Nanda; Andrew Yaeh; Tzlil Rozenblat; Michael B Sisti; Jeffrey N Bruce; Guy M McKhann; Sameer A Sheth; Jeraldine Lesser; Simon K Cheng; Steven R Isaacson; Andrew B Lassman; Eileen P Connolly; Tony J C Wang Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 4.130