Literature DB >> 25304697

Should risk from medical imaging be assessed in the absence of benefit and vice versa?

Louis K Wagner1.   

Abstract

Diagnostic radiology has an image problem. In its effort to develop a better understanding of benefit-risk in medical radiology, data on potential risks associated with medical imaging have been welcomed into the medical community. As such, risk perspectives and mantras from the occupational health profession have been adopted and applied to patients. These perspectives often focus on risk with only casual, incidental, or no reference to the benefits experienced by patients. These occupational health viewpoints have accumulated over decades, have overshadowed a very limited perspective about the benefits of medical X-rays, and have become an integrated part of our profession. This review argues that the medical profession should abandon perspectives on risk that are adopted from occupational health professions and focus on perspectives that realistically focus on the medical benefit-risk for patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25304697     DOI: 10.1007/s00247-014-3018-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Radiol        ISSN: 0301-0449


  11 in total

1.  The utilization and efficacy of pelvimetry.

Authors:  K M Kelly; D A Madden; J S Arcarese; M Barnett; R F Brown
Journal:  Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med       Date:  1975-09

2.  X-ray pelvimetry: useful procedure or medical nonsense.

Authors:  J A Campbell
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Managing radiation use in medical imaging: a multifaceted challenge.

Authors:  Hedvig Hricak; David J Brenner; S James Adelstein; Donald P Frush; Eric J Hall; Roger W Howell; Cynthia H McCollough; Fred A Mettler; Mark S Pearce; Orhan H Suleiman; James H Thrall; Louis K Wagner
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-12-16       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Medical radiation exposure in the U.S. in 2006: preliminary results.

Authors:  Fred A Mettler; Bruce R Thomadsen; Mythreyi Bhargavan; Debbie B Gilley; Joel E Gray; Jill A Lipoti; John McCrohan; Terry T Yoshizumi; Mahadevappa Mahesh
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.316

5.  Prenatal x-ray exposure and twins.

Authors:  B MacMahon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-02-28       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Reduction of radiation exposure during radiography for scoliosis.

Authors:  J E Gray; A D Hoffman; H A Peterson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.284

7.  Assessment of scoliosis in children: low dose radiographic technique.

Authors:  G M Ardran; R Coates; R A Dickson; A Dixon-Brown; F M Harding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  A record-based case-control study of natural background radiation and the incidence of childhood leukaemia and other cancers in Great Britain during 1980-2006.

Authors:  G M Kendall; M P Little; R Wakeford; K J Bunch; J C H Miles; T J Vincent; J R Meara; M F G Murphy
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 11.528

9.  Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Mark S Pearce; Jane A Salotti; Mark P Little; Kieran McHugh; Choonsik Lee; Kwang Pyo Kim; Nicola L Howe; Cecile M Ronckers; Preetha Rajaraman; Alan W Sir Craft; Louise Parker; Amy Berrington de González
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Cancer risk in 680,000 people exposed to computed tomography scans in childhood or adolescence: data linkage study of 11 million Australians.

Authors:  John D Mathews; Anna V Forsythe; Zoe Brady; Martin W Butler; Stacy K Goergen; Graham B Byrnes; Graham G Giles; Anthony B Wallace; Philip R Anderson; Tenniel A Guiver; Paul McGale; Timothy M Cain; James G Dowty; Adrian C Bickerstaffe; Sarah C Darby
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2013-05-21
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Ionizing radiation from computed tomography versus anesthesia for magnetic resonance imaging in infants and children: patient safety considerations.

Authors:  Michael J Callahan; Robert D MacDougall; Sarah D Bixby; Stephan D Voss; Richard L Robertson; Joseph P Cravero
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-11-27

2.  Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector.

Authors:  Paul A Oakley; Deed E Harrison
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.658

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.