Literature DB >> 17576543

Sequential behavior in the rat: role of skill and attention.

Dorothée Domenger1, Rainer K W Schwarting.   

Abstract

The serial reaction time task (SRTT) is a well-established experimental tool to study cognitive and neural mechanisms of sequential performance in humans. We have recently developed a rodent version of the human serial reaction time task, in which rats have to respond to visual stimuli by nose-poking into one of four spatial locations in order to obtain food reward. In this task, rats display superior performance under sequential as compared to random conditions of stimulus presentation. Specifically, the subjects are able to profit from sequential regularities in terms of faster reaction times and higher response accuracy. Here, we studied the effects of violating a single stimulus in rats, which had been intensively trained under sequential conditions, and we asked whether these subjects, when confronted with sequence violations, still attend to the actual stimulus order (that is, show correct responses), or whether their behavior has become fully automated (leading to specific incorrect responses to violated stimulus positions). In two independent experiments using partly differing instrumental set-ups, we found that the responses to non-cued violations of single stimulus positions were mostly correct, that is, the animals were apparently attending to the stimuli. Nevertheless, these reaction times were slowed, which probably reflects cognitive resources necessary to respond correctly to the unexpected irregularities. When quantifying the minority of responses, which were incorrect, we found that most of them were directed to the position, where the stimulus would have appeared if the sequence had not been violated. These responses were faster than the correct ones (to the violated stimulus), which indicates that sequential responding had become partly automated. Together, our data show that both, attention and skill play a role for sequential performance in our SRT task, and that they can be dissected by quantification of specific response types. In future work, the neural correlates underlying these functional mechanisms will have to be addressed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17576543     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-0987-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  25 in total

1.  Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Scott A Huettel; Peter B Mack; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The cognitive and neural architecture of sequence representation.

Authors:  Steven W Keele; Richard Ivry; Ulrich Mayr; Eliot Hazeltine; Herbert Heuer
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 3.  Frontal-striatal circuit functions: context, sequence, and consequence.

Authors:  Jean A Saint-Cyr
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.892

4.  On the development of procedural knowledge.

Authors:  D B Willingham; M J Nissen; P Bullemer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  The serial reaction time task in the rat: effects of D1 and D2 dopamine-receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Dorothée Domenger; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2006-09-29       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The anatomy of memory.

Authors:  M Mishkin; T Appenzeller
Journal:  Sci Am       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 2.142

7.  Sequential behavior in the rat: a new model using food-reinforced instrumental behavior.

Authors:  Dorothée Domenger; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  A double dissociation between the rat hippocampus and medial caudoputamen in processing two forms of knowledge.

Authors:  W E DeCoteau; R P Kesner
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.912

9.  Parallel brain systems for learning with and without awareness.

Authors:  P J Reber; L R Squire
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Implicit learning in Parkinson's disease: evidence from a verbal version of the serial reaction time task.

Authors:  H Westwater; J McDowall; R Siegert; S Mossman; D Abernethy
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 2.475

View more
  4 in total

1.  Rat psychomotor vigilance task with fast response times using a conditioned lick behavior.

Authors:  Jennifer L Walker; Brendan M Walker; Fernanda Monjaraz Fuentes; David M Rector
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  6-hydroxydopamine lesions in the rat neostriatum impair sequential learning in a serial reaction time task.

Authors:  Moritz Thede Eckart; Moriah Christina Huelse-Matia; Rebecca S McDonald; Rainer K -W Schwarting
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.911

3.  Procedural Performance Benefits after Excitotoxic Hippocampal Lesions in the Rat Sequential Reaction Time Task.

Authors:  Sebastian Busse; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 3.911

4.  Decoupling Actions from Consequences: Dorsal Hippocampal Lesions Facilitate Instrumental Performance, but Impair Behavioral Flexibility in Rats.

Authors:  Sebastian Busse; Rainer K W Schwarting
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.