| Literature DB >> 25301475 |
Christiane Malfitano, Catarina Andrade Barboza, Cristiano Mostarda, Renata Kelly da Palma, Camila Paixão dos Santos, Bruno Rodrigues, Sarah Cristina Ferreira Freitas, Adriane Belló-Klein, Susana Llesuy, Maria-Cláudia Irigoyen, Kátia De Angelis.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous research has demonstrated that hyperglycemia may protect the heart against ischemic injury. The aim of the present study was to investigate the association between hyperglycemia and myocardial infarction on cardiovascular autonomic modulation and cardiac oxidative stress profile in rats. Male Wistar rats were divided into: control (C), diabetic (D), myocardial infarcted (MI) and diabetic infarcted rats (DMI).Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25301475 PMCID: PMC4198704 DOI: 10.1186/s12933-014-0131-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Cardiovascular autonomic modulation in studied groups
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 122 ± 15 | 35 ± 4.0* | 39.5 ± 6.0* | 23 ± 2.5* |
|
| 3.0 ± 0.28 | 1.3 ± 0.36 *† | 4.0 ± 0.53 | 1.2 ± 0.10*† |
|
| 20 ± 1 | 14 ± 3† | 36.3 ± 3.2* | 12 ± 1.6† |
|
| 12 ± 1.0 | 6.7 ± 0.7* | 5.3 ± 0.9* | 6. ± 0.6* |
|
| 80 ± 1 | 86 ± 3† | 64 ± 3.2* | 88 ± 1.6† |
|
| 0.26 ± 0.02 | 0.11 ± 0.02*† | 0.40 ± 0.04* | 0.14 ± 0.02*† |
|
| ||||
|
| 28 ± 4.0 | 9 ± 1.3*† | 49 ± 7.5* | 2 ± 0.3*† |
|
| 2.5 ± 0.80 | 1.0 ± 0.16*† | 6 ± 0.53* | 1.0 ± 0.09*† |
Systolic blood pressure (BPV) and heart rate (HRV) variabilities computed from 0.20 to 3 Hz (total power), low-frequency (LF: 0.20-0.75 Hz) and high-frequency (HF: 0.75-3 Hz) bands of control (C), diabetic (D), myocardial infarcted (MI) and diabetic myocardial infarcted (DMI) rats. Data are reported as mean ± SEM. *p ≤ 0.05 compared with C; †p ≤ 0.05 compared with MI.
Figure 1Oxidative stress profile of left ventricle homogenates in control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (MI), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DMI) rats (n = 8 for each group). A: Lipid peroxidation indicated by thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances (TBARS). B: protein carbonylation. *p < 0.05 vs. C; †p < 0.05 vs. MI.
Figure 2Oxidative stress profile of left ventricle homogenates in control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (MI), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DMI) rats (n = 8 for each group). A: superoxide anion. B: catalase activity. C: superoxide dismutase activity. D: glutathione peroxidase activity. *p < 0.05 vs. C; †p < 0.05 vs. MI; ‡p < 0.05 vs. D.
Figure 3Oxidized (GSH) and reduced glutathione (GSSG) ratio in left ventricle tissue in control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (MI), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DMI) rats (n = 8 for each group). †p < 0.05 vs. MI.
Figure 4Pearson correlation analysis involving animals of all groups (C; D; MI and DMI). A: Cardiac sympathetic modulation (LF band of PI) and catalase. B: Cardiac sympathetic modulation (LF band of PI) and superoxide anion. C: Vascular sympathetic modulation (LF band of SAP) and GSH/GSSG ratio.