| Literature DB >> 21470409 |
Bruno Rodrigues1, Kaleizu T Rosa, Alessandra Medeiros, Beatriz D Schaan, Patricia C Brum, Kátia De Angelis, Maria Cláudia Irigoyen.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although clinical diabetes mellitus is obviously a high risk factor for myocardial infarction (MI), in experimental studies disagreement exists about the sensitivity to ischemic injury of an infarcted myocardium. Recently, our group demonstrated that diabetic animals presented better cardiac function recovery and cellular resistance to ischemic injury than nondiabetics. In the present study, we evaluated the chronic effects of MI on left ventricular (LV) and autonomic functions in streptozotocin (STZ) diabetic rats.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 21470409 PMCID: PMC3084163 DOI: 10.1186/1475-2840-10-26
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol ISSN: 1475-2840 Impact factor: 9.951
Initial and final echocardiographic measurements in control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (I), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DI) groups.
| Parameters | C | D | I | DI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | Initial | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 0.95 ± 0.01 | 1.05 ± 0.04 | 1.04 ± 0.01 |
| Final | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 0.95 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.06# | 1.16 ± 0.06 | |
| | Initial | 0.65 ± 0.01 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 0.75 ± 0.01*† | 0.77 ± 0.03*† |
| Final | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 0.71 ± 0.02 | 0.85 ± 0.03*† | 0.86 ± 0.03*† | |
| | Initial | 74 ± 2 | 80 ± 1 | 48 ± 3*† | 51 ± 3*† |
| Final | 71 ± 1 | 61 ± 2# | 42 ± 3*† | 55 ± 5*‡ | |
| | Initial | 56 ± 3 | 54 ± 2 | 38 ± 2* | 38 ± 3* |
| Final | 50 ± 3 | 38 ± 4#* | 34 ± 2* | 43 ± 1‡ | |
| | Initial | 1.81 ± 0.07 | 1.96 ± 0.05 | 1.81 ± 0.09 | 1.94 ± 0.08 |
| Final | 1.79 ± 0.05 | 2.07 ± 0.07* | 2.03 ± 0.05* | 2.16 ± 0.15* | |
| | Initial | 1.87 ± 0.11 | 1.95 ± 0.10 | 1.97 ± 0.10 | 1.83 ± 0.09 |
| Final | 1.75 ± 0.07 | 2.20 ± 0.09#* | 2.13 ± 0.09* | 2.45 ± 0.25#* | |
| | Initial | 0.39 ± 0.01 | 0.41 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.44 ± 0.03 |
| Final | 0.34 ± 0.03 | 0.50 ± 0.02* | 0.57 ± 0.04* | 0.45 ± 0.01*‡ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. LV mass - Left ventricular mass corrected by body weight; LVEDD - Left ventricular end-diameter during diastole; EF - Ejection fraction; VCF - Velocity of circumferential fiber shortening; EDT- Peak E desacceleration time; IVRT- Left ventricular isovolumetric relaxation time; MPI - Myocardial performance index. # p < 0.05 vs. initial evaluation; * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. D; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. I (n = 8 for each group).
Hemodynamic measurements and pulse interval variability in control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (I), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DI) groups.
| Parameter/Group | C | D | I | DI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 129 ± 2 | 109 ± 3* | 117 ± 3*† | 106 ± 2*‡ | |
| 92 ± 2 | 83 ± 2* | 90 ± 3 | 87 ± 2* | |
| 111 ± 2 | 96 ± 3* | 104 ± 3 | 99 ± 2* | |
| 352 ± 12 | 302 ± 7* | 342 ± 6 | 307 ± 19* | |
| 34 ± 3 | 22 ± 4* | 24 ± 2* | 13 ± 1*†‡ |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM. SAP - Systolic arterial pressure; DAP - Diastolic arterial pressure; MAP - Mean arterial pressure; HR - Heart rate; SD - Standard deviation. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. D; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. I (n = 8 for each group).
Figure 1Baroreflex sensitivity estimated by bradycardic (BR) and tachycardic responses (TR) from control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (I) and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DI) rats (n = 8 for each group). * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. D; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. I.
Figure 2Expression levels of regulatory proteins related to intracellular calcium homeostasis from control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (I), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DI) rats (n = 8 for each group). Targeted bands were normalized to cardiac GAPDH. A) Representative blots of SERCA2, Na+-Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) and GAPDH; B) SERCA2; C) NCX; and D) SERCA2/NCX ratio. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. D; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. I.
Figure 3Expression levels of intracellular calcium efflux mediators from control (C), diabetes (D), myocardial infarction (I), and diabetes + myocardial infarction (DI) rats (n = 8 for each group). Targeted bands were normalized to cardiac GAPDH. A) Representative blots of Phospholamban (PLN), Phosho-Ser16-PLN, Phosho-Thr17-PLN, PP1, and GAPDH; B) PLN; C) SERCA2/PLN ratio; D) Phosho-Ser16-PLN normalized to total PLN; E) Phosho-Thr17-PLN normalized to total PLN; and F) PP1. * p < 0.05 vs. C; † p < 0.05 vs. D; ‡ p < 0.05 vs. I.