OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of diabetes on myocardium in the setting of acute ischemia-reperfusion in a porcine model. METHODS: In normoglycemic (ND group) and alloxan-induced diabetic (DM group) male Yucatan pigs, the left anterior descending coronary artery territory was made ischemic and then reperfused. Hemodynamic values and myocardial function were measured. Monastryl blue and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining were used to assess size of the areas at risk and infarction. Glycogen content was assessed using periodic acid-Schiff staining. Cell death and survival signaling pathways were assessed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure and developed left ventricular pressure were lower in the DM group (P < .05). Whereas global left ventricular function was worse in the DM group (P < .05), regional function in the area at risk was improved on the horizontal axis (P < .05). Mean infarct size was smaller in the DM versus the ND group (19% vs 43%; P < .05), whereas the area at risk was similar in both groups (34% vs 36%; P = .7). Ischemic myocardium in the DM group displayed more prominent staining for glycogen compared with the ND group. In the area at risk, expression of cell survival proteins including phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (0.17 ± 0.04 vs 0.04 ± 0.01; P < .05), heat shock protein 27 (0.7 ± 0.2 vs 0.3 ± 0.1; P < .05), nuclear factor-κB (0.14 ± 0.02 vs 0.03 ± 0.01; P < .05), and mammalian target of rapamycin (0.35 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.02; P < .05) were higher in DM animals, whereas in nonischemic tissue, expression of these proteins was similar or lower in the DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Although type I diabetes worsens global left ventricular function, it is protective in the ischemic area, leading to increased expression of cell survival proteins and decreased infarct size.
OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the impact of diabetes on myocardium in the setting of acute ischemia-reperfusion in a porcine model. METHODS: In normoglycemic (ND group) and alloxan-induced diabetic (DM group) male Yucatan pigs, the left anterior descending coronary artery territory was made ischemic and then reperfused. Hemodynamic values and myocardial function were measured. Monastryl blue and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining were used to assess size of the areas at risk and infarction. Glycogen content was assessed using periodic acid-Schiff staining. Cell death and survival signaling pathways were assessed by immunoblotting. RESULTS: Mean arterial pressure and developed left ventricular pressure were lower in the DM group (P < .05). Whereas global left ventricular function was worse in the DM group (P < .05), regional function in the area at risk was improved on the horizontal axis (P < .05). Mean infarct size was smaller in the DM versus the ND group (19% vs 43%; P < .05), whereas the area at risk was similar in both groups (34% vs 36%; P = .7). Ischemic myocardium in the DM group displayed more prominent staining for glycogen compared with the ND group. In the area at risk, expression of cell survival proteins including phosphorylated endothelial nitric oxide synthase (0.17 ± 0.04 vs 0.04 ± 0.01; P < .05), heat shock protein 27 (0.7 ± 0.2 vs 0.3 ± 0.1; P < .05), nuclear factor-κB (0.14 ± 0.02 vs 0.03 ± 0.01; P < .05), and mammalian target of rapamycin (0.35 ± 0.05 vs 0.15 ± 0.02; P < .05) were higher in DM animals, whereas in nonischemic tissue, expression of these proteins was similar or lower in the DM group. CONCLUSIONS: Although type I diabetes worsens global left ventricular function, it is protective in the ischemic area, leading to increased expression of cell survival proteins and decreased infarct size.
Authors: P Ping; J Zhang; X Cao; R C Li; D Kong; X L Tang; Y Qiu; S Manchikalapudi; J A Auchampach; R G Black; R Bolli Journal: Am J Physiol Date: 1999-05
Authors: Raymond R Russell; Ji Li; David L Coven; Marc Pypaert; Christoph Zechner; Monica Palmeri; Frank J Giordano; James Mu; Morris J Birnbaum; Lawrence H Young Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-08 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: M J Roberts; I S Young; T G Trouton; E R Trimble; M M Khan; S W Webb; C M Wilson; G C Patterson; A A Adgey Journal: Lancet Date: 1990-07-21 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jing Hu; Xiao-Yu Gu; Yan Meng; Ya Wang; Qin Gao; Zheng-Hong Li; Xiao-Hong Li; Xiang-Yang Cheng Journal: Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao Date: 2017-11-20
Authors: Bruno Rodrigues; Kaleizu T Rosa; Alessandra Medeiros; Beatriz D Schaan; Patricia C Brum; Kátia De Angelis; Maria Cláudia Irigoyen Journal: Cardiovasc Diabetol Date: 2011-04-06 Impact factor: 9.951