Literature DB >> 25298387

Hierarchical effects of task engagement on amplitude modulation encoding in auditory cortex.

Mamiko Niwa1, Kevin N O'Connor1, Elizabeth Engall1, Jeffrey S Johnson1, M L Sutter2.   

Abstract

We recorded from middle lateral belt (ML) and primary (A1) auditory cortical neurons while animals discriminated amplitude-modulated (AM) sounds and also while they sat passively. Engagement in AM discrimination improved ML and A1 neurons' ability to discriminate AM with both firing rate and phase-locking; however, task engagement affected neural AM discrimination differently in the two fields. The results suggest that these two areas utilize different AM coding schemes: a "single mode" in A1 that relies on increased activity for AM relative to unmodulated sounds and a "dual-polar mode" in ML that uses both increases and decreases in neural activity to encode modulation. In the dual-polar ML code, nonsynchronized responses might play a special role. The results are consistent with findings in the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices during discrimination of vibrotactile modulation frequency, implicating a common scheme in the hierarchical processing of temporal information among different modalities. The time course of activity differences between behaving and passive conditions was also distinct in A1 and ML and may have implications for auditory attention. At modulation depths ≥ 16% (approximately behavioral threshold), A1 neurons' improvement in distinguishing AM from unmodulated noise is relatively constant or improves slightly with increasing modulation depth. In ML, improvement during engagement is most pronounced near threshold and disappears at highly suprathreshold depths. This ML effect is evident later in the stimulus, and mainly in nonsynchronized responses. This suggests that attention-related increases in activity are stronger or longer-lasting for more difficult stimuli in ML.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  attention; auditory cortex; neural coding; sound processing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25298387      PMCID: PMC4294569          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00458.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  106 in total

1.  Periodicity and firing rate as candidate neural codes for the frequency of vibrotactile stimuli.

Authors:  E Salinas; A Hernandez; A Zainos; R Romo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-07-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Chimaeric sounds reveal dichotomies in auditory perception.

Authors:  Zachary M Smith; Bertrand Delgutte; Andrew J Oxenham
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-07       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Single-unit activity in the auditory cortex of monkeys selectively attending left vs. right ear stimuli.

Authors:  D A Benson; R D Hienz
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-12-29       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  A comparison of neuron response properties in areas A1 and CM of the marmoset monkey auditory cortex: tones and broadband noise.

Authors:  Yoshinao Kajikawa; Lisa de La Mothe; Suzanne Blumell; Troy A Hackett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The representation of amplitude modulations in the mammalian auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Bjarne Krebs; Nicholas A Lesica; Benedikt Grothe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Fusion of auditory components: effects of the frequency of amplitude modulation.

Authors:  A S Bregman; R Levitan; C Liao
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1990-01

7.  Functional specialization in rhesus monkey auditory cortex.

Authors:  B Tian; D Reser; A Durham; A Kustov; J P Rauschecker
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-04-13       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Single cell activity in the auditory cortex of Rhesus monkeys: behavioral dependency.

Authors:  J M Miller; D Sutton; B Pfingst; A Ryan; R Beaton; G Gourevitch
Journal:  Science       Date:  1972-08-04       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Evidence of functional connectivity between auditory cortical areas revealed by amplitude modulation sound processing.

Authors:  Marie Guéguin; Régine Le Bouquin-Jeannès; Gérard Faucon; Patrick Chauvel; Catherine Liégeois-Chauvel
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-02       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  Engaging in an auditory task suppresses responses in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Gonzalo H Otazu; Lung-Hao Tai; Yang Yang; Anthony M Zador
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-04-12       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  14 in total

1.  Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marc A Heiser; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Background noise exerts diverse effects on the cortical encoding of foreground sounds.

Authors:  B J Malone; Marc A Heiser; Ralph E Beitel; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Hierarchical differences in population coding within auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Mamiko Niwa; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of aging on the response of single neurons to amplitude-modulated noise in primary auditory cortex of rhesus macaque.

Authors:  Jacqueline A Overton; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Amplitude modulation encoding in the auditory cortex: comparisons between the primary and middle lateral belt regions.

Authors:  Jeffrey S Johnson; Mamiko Niwa; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Age-Related Changes in Temporal Processing of Rapidly-Presented Sound Sequences in the Macaque Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Chi-Wing Ng; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  Choice-related activity and neural encoding in primary auditory cortex and lateral belt during feature-selective attention.

Authors:  Jennifer L Mohn; Joshua D Downer; Kevin N O'Connor; Jeffrey S Johnson; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Temporal Encoding is Required for Categorization, But Not Discrimination.

Authors:  Justin D Yao; Dan H Sanes
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  An Emergent Population Code in Primary Auditory Cortex Supports Selective Attention to Spectral and Temporal Sound Features.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; Jessica R Verhein; Brittany C Rapone; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 6.709

10.  Temporally precise population coding of dynamic sounds by auditory cortex.

Authors:  Joshua D Downer; James Bigelow; Melissa J Runfeldt; Brian J Malone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 2.974

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.