Literature DB >> 34077273

Temporally precise population coding of dynamic sounds by auditory cortex.

Joshua D Downer1, James Bigelow1, Melissa J Runfeldt1, Brian J Malone1,2.   

Abstract

Fluctuations in the amplitude envelope of complex sounds provide critical cues for hearing, particularly for speech and animal vocalizations. Responses to amplitude modulation (AM) in the ascending auditory pathway have chiefly been described for single neurons. How neural populations might collectively encode and represent information about AM remains poorly characterized, even in primary auditory cortex (A1). We modeled population responses to AM based on data recorded from A1 neurons in awake squirrel monkeys and evaluated how accurately single trial responses to modulation frequencies from 4 to 512 Hz could be decoded as functions of population size, composition, and correlation structure. We found that a population-based decoding model that simulated convergent, equally weighted inputs was highly accurate and remarkably robust to the inclusion of neurons that were individually poor decoders. By contrast, average rate codes based on convergence performed poorly; effective decoding using average rates was only possible when the responses of individual neurons were segregated, as in classical population decoding models using labeled lines. The relative effectiveness of dynamic rate coding in auditory cortex was explained by shared modulation phase preferences among cortical neurons, despite heterogeneity in rate-based modulation frequency tuning. Our results indicate significant population-based synchrony in primary auditory cortex and suggest that robust population coding of the sound envelope information present in animal vocalizations and speech can be reliably achieved even with indiscriminate pooling of cortical responses. These findings highlight the importance of firing rate dynamics in population-based sensory coding.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Fundamental questions remain about population coding in primary auditory cortex (A1). In particular, issues of spike timing in models of neural populations have been largely ignored. We find that spike-timing in response to sound envelope fluctuations is highly similar across neuron populations in A1. This property of shared envelope phase preference allows for a simple population model involving unweighted convergence of neuronal responses to classify amplitude modulation frequencies with high accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory; cortex; decoding; hearing; population coding

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34077273      PMCID: PMC8325602          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00709.2020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.974


  67 in total

1.  The effect of noise correlations in populations of diversely tuned neurons.

Authors:  Alexander S Ecker; Philipp Berens; Andreas S Tolias; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Millisecond encoding precision of auditory cortex neurons.

Authors:  Christoph Kayser; Nikos K Logothetis; Stefano Panzeri
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Differences between primary auditory cortex and auditory belt related to encoding and choice for AM sounds.

Authors:  Mamiko Niwa; Jeffrey S Johnson; Kevin N O'Connor; Mitchell L Sutter
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-08       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Modulation-frequency-specific adaptation in awake auditory cortex.

Authors:  Brian J Malone; Ralph E Beitel; Maike Vollmer; Marc A Heiser; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Sustained firing in auditory cortex evoked by preferred stimuli.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Wang; Thomas Lu; Ross K Snider; Li Liang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Complementary contributions of spike timing and spike rate to perceptual decisions in rat S1 and S2 cortex.

Authors:  Yanfang Zuo; Houman Safaai; Giuseppe Notaro; Alberto Mazzoni; Stefano Panzeri; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2015-01-22       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Extracellular voltage threshold settings can be tuned for optimal encoding of movement and stimulus parameters.

Authors:  Emily R Oby; Sagi Perel; Patrick T Sadtler; Douglas A Ruff; Jessica L Mischel; David F Montez; Marlene R Cohen; Aaron P Batista; Steven M Chase
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 5.379

8.  A neural ensemble correlation code for sound category identification.

Authors:  Mina Sadeghi; Xiu Zhai; Ian H Stevenson; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Invariant neural responses for sensory categories revealed by the time-varying information for communication calls.

Authors:  Julie E Elie; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 10.  Philosophy of the Spike: Rate-Based vs. Spike-Based Theories of the Brain.

Authors:  Romain Brette
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.