| Literature DB >> 25298233 |
Polychronis Rempoulakis1, Negar Afshar, Beatriz Osorio, Martha Barajas-Aceves, Joanna Szular, Sohel Ahmad, Thilakasiri Dammalage, Ulysses Sto Tomas, Esther Nemny-Lavy, Mor Salomon, Marc J B Vreysen, David Nestel, Fanis Missirlis.
Abstract
Μetal cofactors are required for enzymatic catalysis and structural stability of many proteins. Physiological metal requirements underpin the evolution of cellular and systemic regulatory mechanisms for metal uptake, storage and excretion. Considering the role of metal biology in animal evolution, this paper asks whether metal content is conserved between different fruit flies. A similar metal homeostasis was previously observed in Drosophilidae flies cultivated on the same larval medium. Each species accumulated in the order of 200 µg iron and zinc and approximately ten-fold less manganese and copper per gram dry weight of the adult insect. In this paper, data on the metal content in fourteen species of Tephritidae, which are major agricultural pests worldwide, are presented. These fruit flies can be polyphagous (e.g., Ceratitis capitata) or strictly monophagous (e.g., Bactrocera oleae) or oligophagous (e.g., Anastrepha grandis) and were maintained in the laboratory on five distinct diets based on olive oil, carrot, wheat bran, zucchini and molasses, respectively. The data indicate that overall metal content and distribution between the Tephritidae and Drosophilidae species was similar. Reduced metal concentration was observed in B. oleae. Feeding the polyphagous C. capitata with the diet of B. oleae resulted in a significant quantitative reduction of all metals. Thus, dietary components affect metal content in some Tephritidae. Nevertheless, although the evidence suggests some fruit fly species evolved preferences in the use or storage of particular metals, no metal concentration varied in order of magnitude between these two families of Diptera that evolved independently for over 100 million years.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25298233 PMCID: PMC4223573 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-014-9793-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometals ISSN: 0966-0844 Impact factor: 2.949
Characteristics and origin of species used in this study
| Species and level of phagy | Natural host* | Origin of strain | Population | Generation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-1 | Olives | Italy | Wild type | 5 |
| 1-2 | Greece | Laboratory | >500 | |
| 1-3 | Israel | Lab-wild hybrid | 100 | |
| 2-1 | Apples, guava, banana | Thailand | Wild type | 20 |
| 2-2 | China, Yunnan | Laboratory | 6 | |
| 2-3 | Hawai | Lab GSS strain | 65 | |
| 3 | Apples, apricots, coffee | Australia | Laboratory | 32 |
| 4 | Pumpkins | Mauritius | Wild type | 19 |
| 5 |
| Surinam, Paramaribo | Wild type | 16 |
| 6 | Banana, mango, papaya | Malaysia, Serdang | Wild type | 12 |
| 7 | Kashew nut, citrus, pine apple | Kenya | Laboratory | 37 |
| 8 | Peach, guava, mango | Mauritius | Laboratory | 19 |
| 9 | Breadfruit, Sizygium, mango | Philippines, Guimaras | Wild type | 17 |
| 10 |
| Mexico | Laboratory | 25 |
| 11 |
| Brazil, Vacaria | Wild type | 22 |
| 12 | Pumpkins | Brazil** | Wild type | 3 |
| 13-1 | ~356 hosts | Argentina | Wild type | 70 |
| 13-2 | Austria | Lab GSS strain | 8 | |
| 13-3 | Israel | Laboratory | ~500 | |
| 14 | Pumpkins | South Israel | Laboratory | 50 |
| 15 | Yeasts | Italy, Tannes | Wild type | >500 |
* Host data from (White and Elson-Harris 1994) and from the invasive species compendium cabi.org
** Collected from fruits imported from Brazil
m Monophagus, o oligophagus, p polyphagous, GSS genetic sexing strain
Metal content (mg metal/g dry weight) of recently eclosed adult flies presented as averages ± standard deviation with number of independent biological replicates indicated as N
| Species/Origin | Diet | N | Fe (mg/g) | Zn (mg/g) | Cu (mg/g) | Mn (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| 1-1 Italy—wild | i | 7 | 0.13 ± 0.03cd | 0.13 ± 0.02bc | 0.008 ± 0.003b | 0.008 ± 0.001b
|
| 1-2 Greece—lab | i | 8 | 0.14 ± 0.05cd | 0.12 ± 0.03bc | 0.010 ± 0.003b | 0.010 ± 0.001ab
|
| 1-3 Israel—lab | i | 7 | 0.11 ± 0.03d | 0.11 ± 0.02c | 0.009 ± 0.004b | 0.006 ± 0.000b
|
|
| ||||||
| 2-1 Thailand—wild | ii | 9 | 0.19 ± 0.03cd | 0.19 ± 0.04b | 0.008 ± 0.002b | 0.041 ± 0.025ab |
| 2-2 China—lab | ii | 9 | 0.19 ± 0.05cd | 0.18 ± 0.06bc | 0.008 ± 0.002b | 0.025 ± 0.006ab** |
| 2-3 Hawai—lab | ii | 9 | 0.18 ± 0.08cd | 0.18 ± 0.04bc | 0.008 ± 0.004b | 0.051 ± 0.041ab |
|
| ||||||
| 13-1 Argentina—wild | iii | 9 | 0.24 ± 0.09bc | 0.17 ± 0.04bc | 0.006 ± 0.002b | 0.028 ± 0.016ab |
| 13-2 Austria—lab | iii | 9 | 0.30 ± 0.13ab | 0.18 ± 0.05bc | 0.010 ± 0.004b | 0.054 ± 0.016a |
| 13-3 Israel—lab | iii*** | 7 | 0.41 ± 0.04a | 0.27 ± 0.03a | 0.028 ± 0.003a | 0.041 ± 0.006ab |
| Statistics**** | ||||||
| 1-way ANOVA F ratio | F(8,65) | 12.8, | 10.3, | 35.1, | 3.7, | |
Different populations, wild and lab-adapted, from three representative species are shown
* Average of three determinations shown because in other samples (Mn) was below the detection limit
** Average of six determinations shown because in other samples (Mn) was below the detection limit
*** This diet contained different preservatives
(HCl 1.6 % and Nipagin 0.4 % instead of Sodium Benzoate 0.5 % and Citric Acid 1.8 %)
**** Within columns, averages followed by different letters [a, b, c, d] indicate statistically significant differences in pair-wise comparisons using the Tukey HSD test and p < 0.05
***** F(8,50)
Metal content (mg metal/g dry weight) of Tephritidae species
| Species | Diet | N | Fe (mg/g) | Zn (mg/g) | Cu (mg/g) | Mn (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | i | 22 | 0.13 ± 0.04c | 0.12 ± 0.03c | 0.009 ± 0.003bc | 0.008 ± 0.002d |
| 2. | ii | 27 | 0.18 ± 0.04bc | 0.18 ± 0.05b | 0.008 ± 0.003c | 0.040 ± 0.021c |
| 3. | ii | 9 | 0.18 ± 0.04bc | 0.22 ± 0.03b | 0.010 ± 0.002abc | 0.038 ± 0.013cd |
| 4. | ii | 9 | 0.15 ± 0.05bc | 0.21 ± 0.05b | 0.010 ± 0.002abc | 0.037 ± 0.017cd |
| 5. | ii | 9 | 0.23 ± 0.05ab | 0.21 ± 0.05b | 0.009 ± 0.002abc | 0.044 ± 0.016bcd |
| 6. | ii | 9 | 0.24 ± 0.05ab | 0.23 ± 0.05b | 0.010 ± 0.005abc | 0.100 ± 0.048a |
| 7. | ii | 9 | 0.19 ± 0.03bc | 0.18 ± 0.02bc | 0.006 ± 0.003c | 0.078 ± 0.043ab |
| 8. | ii | 9 | 0.20 ± 0.07bc | 0.22 ± 0.08b | 0.006 ± 0.003c | 0.049 ± 0.028bc |
| 9. | ii | 9 | 0.23 ± 0.06ab | 0.20 ± 0.05b | 0.011 ± 0.004abc | 0.024 ± 0.006 cd |
| 10. | ii | 9 | 0.21 ± 0.05bc | 0.24 ± 0.04b | 0.017 ± 0.004a | 0.048 ± 0.015bc |
| 11. | ii | 9 | 0.19 ± 0.04bc | 0.22 ± 0.06b | 0.010 ± 0.002abc | 0.039 ± 0.026cd |
| 12. | iv | 8 | 0.17 ± 0.05bc | 0.34 ± 0.09a | 0.012 ± 0.004abc | 0.028 ± 0.011cd |
| 13. | iii | 25 | 0.31 ± 0.12a | 0.20 ± 0.06b | 0.014 ± 0.010a | 0.041 ± 0.018c |
| 14. | iv | 7 | 0.17 ± 0.03bc | 0.23 ± 0.04b | 0.016 ± 0.005a | 0.011 ± 0.002cd |
| 15. | v | 9 | 0.19 ± 0.03bc | 0.23 ± 0.07b | 0.015 ± 0.003abc | 0.017 ± 0.008cd |
| Statistics | ||||||
| 1-way ANOVA F ratio | F(14,164) | 8.5, | 9.8, | 5.5, | 9.2, | |
* Within columns, averages followed by different letters [a, b, c, d] indicate statistically significant differences in pair-wise comparisons using the Tukey HSD test and p < 0.05
** F(8,149)
Metal content (mg metal/g dry weight) per genus of Tephritidae and comparison with the Drosophilidae family
| Species/Genus/Family | N | Fe (mg/g) | Zn (mg/g) | Cu (mg/g) | Mn (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 112 | 0.18 ± 0.06b | 0.18 ± 0.05b | 0.009 ± 0.003b | 0.045 ± 0.035a |
|
| 26 | 0.19 ± 0.05b | 0.26 ± 0.09a | 0.013 ± 0.004a | 0.039 ± 0.020ab |
|
| 25 | 0.31 ± 0.12a | 0.20 ± 0.06b | 0.014 ± 0.010a | 0.041 ± 0.018ab |
|
| 7 | 0.17 ± 0.03b | 0.23 ± 0.04ab | 0.016 ± 0.005a | 0.011 ± 0.002b |
| Statistics* | |||||
| 1-way ANOVA F ratio | F(3,166) | 22.7, | 12.4, | 14.6, | 3.3, |
| Average Tephritidae | 14 | 0.20 ± 0.04 | 0.21 ± 0.05 | 0.011 ± 0.003 | 0.042 ± 0.024 |
| Average Drosophilidae | 9 | 0.22 ± 0.07 | 0.18 ± 0.07 | 0.018 ± 0.006 | 0.028 ± 0.013 |
*Within columns, averages followed by different letters [a, b, c, d] indicate statistically significant differences in pair-wise comparisons using the Tukey HSD test and p < 0.05
**F(3,151)
***Data from nine Drosophila species taken from (Sadraie and Missirlis 2011)
Fig. 1Cluster analysis based on the average values of metal composition of 23 Dipteran species belonging to Tephritidae and Drosophilidae families. Clustering by 1st principal component. The relative distributions of iron (blue), zinc (red), manganese (purple) and copper (green) of three representative species that cluster together are depicted on the left, with circle area scaled to total metal content (per g dry weight). For numerical values see Table 3 for the Tephritidae and (Sadraie and Missirlis 2011) for the Drosophilidae. Drosophila melanogaster appears in both references and was raised in different diets between the two studies. It is notable that Tephritidae outliers B. oleae and A. grandis have a very narrow host range and were raised on different diets
Fig. 2Effect of three different dietary schemes on C. capitata protein, lipid and metal content. a A population of C. capitata cultivated in Israel (13–3) was raised on the diet of B. oleae (i—2 % olive oil) and also on a similar diet but omitting the olive oil (i—0 %). Soluble protein and lipid content (higher and lower graphs, respectively) was determined for thirty individual male flies and thirty females per dietary treatment. Mediterranean fruit fly protein content was significantly lower when the flies were raised on 0 % olive oil (F2,27 ratio = 6.62; p = 0.004 for males, F2,27 ratio = 7.02; p = 0.003 for females), and lipid content was significantly higher when they were raised on olive fly diet containing 2 % olive oil (F2,26 ratio = 10.95; p = 0.0004 for males, F2,30 ratio = 8.08; p = 0.001 for females). b The relative distribution of iron (blue), zinc (red), manganese (purple) and copper (green) of the C. capitata on the three different diets is depicted on the left, with circle area scaled to total metal content (for values see Table 5). A single experiment with D. melanogaster is also shown for comparison. Olive oil leads to a reduction of metal content per mg dry weight in both species tested
Effect of switching Ceratitis capitata on the diet of Bactrocera oleae on metal content
| Species | Diet* | N | Fe (mg/g) | Zn (mg/g) | Cu (mg/g) | Mn (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-3 | iii—0 % | 7 | 0.41 ± 0.04a | 0.27 ± 0.03a | 0.028 ± 0.003a | 0.041 ± 0.006a |
| 3-3 | i—2 % | 7 | 0.34 ± 0.03b | 0.12 ± 0.02c | 0.015 ± 0.002c | 0.014 ± 0.003b |
| 3-3 | i—0 % | 6 | 0.40 ± 0.04a | 0.16 ± 0.03b | 0.020 ± 0.003b | 0.014 ± 0.003b |
| Statistics** | ||||||
| 1-way ANOVA F ratio | F(2,17) | 7.7, | 54.5, | 42.4, | 101.6, | |
|
| v—2 % | 1 | 0.12 | 0.16 | 0.014 | 0.007 |
|
| v—0 % | 1 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.016 | 0.026 |
* Olive oil inclusion as indicated
** Within columns, averages followed by different letters [a, b, c, d] indicate statistically significant differences in pair-wise comparisons using the Tukey HSD test and p < 0.05