| Literature DB >> 33026606 |
Johana Vásquez-Procopio1, Subhash Rajpurohit2, Fanis Missirlis3.
Abstract
Insect epidermal cells secrete a cuticle that serves as an exoskeleton providing mechanical rigidity to each individual, but also insulation, camouflage or communication within their environment. Cuticle deposition and hardening (sclerotization) and pigment synthesis are parallel processes requiring tyrosinase activity, which depends on an unidentified copper-dependent enzyme component in Drosophila melanogaster. We determined the metallomes of fly strains selected for lighter or darker cuticles in a laboratory evolution experiment, asking whether any specific element changed in abundance in concert with pigment deposition. The results showed a correlation between total iron content and strength of pigmentation, which was further corroborated by ferritin iron quantification. To ask if the observed increase in iron body content along with increased pigment deposition could be generalizable, we crossed yellow and ebony alleles causing light and dark pigmentation, respectively, into similar genetic backgrounds and measured their metallomes. Iron remained unaffected in the various mutants providing no support for a causative link between pigmentation and iron content. In contrast, the combined analysis of both experiments suggested instead a correlation between pigment deposition and total copper body content, possibly due to increased demand for epidermal tyrosinase activity.Entities:
Keywords: Color; Elemental analysis; Genetic background; Melanin; Zinc
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 33026606 PMCID: PMC7538679 DOI: 10.1007/s10534-020-00245-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biometals ISSN: 0966-0844 Impact factor: 2.949
Metallomes of strains selected for differences in pigmentation through experimental evolution
| µg Cu/g weight | µg Mn/g weight | mg Fe/g weight | mg Zn/g weight | mg Ca/g weight | mg Mg/g weight | mg Na/g weight | mg K/g weight | mg P/g weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tan3 | 12.4 ± 2.2 | 20.8 ± 2.2 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.02 | 0.45 ± 0.03 | 0.86 ± 0.06 | 0.78 ± 0.09 | 5.6 ± 1.1 | 7.8 ± 0.5 |
| La | 12.7 ± 0.2 | 18.2 ± 2.2 | 0.08 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.43 ± 0.06 | 0.72 ± 0.10 | 0.70 ± 0.09 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 1.0 |
| Lb | 11.5 ± 2.2 | 21.2 ± 1.4 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.46 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.07 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 6.8 ± 0.6 |
| Lc | 11.8 ± 1.8 | 17.0 ± 1.9 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.08 | 0.67 ± 0.07 | 0.73 ± 0.09 | 5.2 ± 0.7 | 6.9 ± 0.7 |
| L | |||||||||
| Ca | 12.5 ± 2.4 | 13.6 ± 1.1 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.15 ± 0.02 | 0.35 ± 0.04 | 0.67 ± 0.06 | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 5.0 ± 0.4 | 6.3 ± 0.5 |
| Cb | 13.6 ± 3.4 | 14.8 ± 1.6 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.34 ± 0.02 | 0.69 ± 0.10 | 0.66 ± 0.05 | 5.1 ± 0.7 | 6.7 ± 0.9 |
| Cc | 11.5 ± 1.6 | 13.1 ± 0.9 | 0.11 ± 0.01 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.33 ± 0.03 | 0.66 ± 0.06 | 0.63 ± 0.01 | 4.8 ± 0.3 | 6.3 ± 0.4 |
| C | |||||||||
| Da | 12.8 ± 2.0 | 16.5 ± 0.6 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 0.44 ± 0.01 | 0.79 ± 0.09 | 0.77 ± 0.10 | 5.3 ± 0.7 | 7.3 ± 0.7 |
| Db | 14.0 ± 2.1 | 18.6 ± 1.0 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.84 ± 0.11 | 0.83 ± 0.12 | 5.5 ± 0.8 | 7.8 ± 0.8 |
| Dc | 12.5 ± 1.1 | 12.7 ± 1.6 | 0.12 ± 0.03 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.43 ± 0.03 | 0.79 ± 0.06 | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 5.4 ± 0.5 | 7.5 ± 0.6 |
| D |
A Tukey post-hoc comparison between the light (L), control (C) and dark (D) pigment groups is indicated with minor case letters (statistical difference is present when letters are different between groups). In bold font mean values and standard deviations from the mean are given for all independent measurements of the preceding groups, respectively. Letters are only included when a one-way ANOVA performed on the pool of subgroup replicate measurements identified difference between groups at p < 0.05
Fig. 1Correlation between body ferritin/iron content and pigmentation strength following selection through experimental evolution. a Plot of mean values (in µg copper per g dry body weight) and standard deviations from the mean of adult flies (4–7 days old; mixed sex) in each three sub-populations of the L, C and D groups. One-way ANOVA showed no differences between the groups. b Similar plot for iron (values in mg iron per g dry body weight). c SDS-PAGE under non-reducing conditions followed by Prussian blue staining to reveal ferritin iron. d The same type of gel stained with Coomassie blue to reveal all proteins. The ferritin complex is readily distinguishable due to its abundance, stability and high molecular weight. e Quantification from 3 independent experiments of ferritin iron gels. One-way ANOVA followed by a Tukey post-hoc test reported a statistically significant (p < 0.05) difference between the LA and the DA and DB groups. Lower case letters indicate statistical comparisons between groups; only groups without overlapping letters are show statistical difference to each other. f The mean value for body iron as determined in (b) was normalized for each strain against the wild type TAN3 control and plotted against the values in (e). The result of regression analysis is indicated. Variations in circle color correspond to the different pigmentation intensity in the L, C and D strains
Metallomes of mutant alleles of y and e after six generations of back crossing to isogenic Canton-S and Oregon-R stocks
| µg Cu/g weight | µg Mn/g weight | mg Fe/g weight | mg Zn/g weight | mg Ca/g weight | mg Mg/g weight | mg Na/g weight | mg K/g weight | mg P/g weight | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.9 ± 1.8 | 12.5 ± 3.9 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.21 ± 0.04 | 0.73 ± 0.24 | 0.92 ± 0.07 | 1.1 ± 0.0 | 6.5 ± 0.7 | 8.3 ± 0.9 | |
| 7.7 ± 3.3 | 11.7 ± 1.3 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.58 ± 018 | 0.95 ± 0.09 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 1.2 | 8.7 ± 0.5 | |
| 10.4 ± 1.3 | 14.0 ± 3.7 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 086 ± 0.22 | 0.96 ± 0.03 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 1.0 | 8.5 ± 0.5 | |
| 8.9 ± 2.5 | 10.5 ± 1.7 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 0.65 ± 0.08 | 0.98 ± 0.09 | 1.2 ± 0.0 | 6.6 ± 1.3 | 8.7 ± 0.7 | |
| 11.0 ± 1.1 | 15.3 ± 2.5 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 1.02 ± 0.33 | 0.96 ± 0.04 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 0.5 | 8.3 ± 0.5 | |
| 8.6 ± 1.7 | 11.2 ± 3.3 | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.19 ± 0.03 | 0.81 ± 0.19 | 1.03 ± 0.08 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 1.1 | 9.2 ± 1.1 | |
| 10.3 ± 2.1 | 16.4 ± 3.2 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 0.86 ± 0.29 | 0.96 ± 0.08 | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 6.3 ± 0.5 | 8.1 ± 0.7 | |
| 9.3 ± 2.4 | 7.7 ± 1.0 | 0.12 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.51 ± 0.19 | 0.83 ± 0.14 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 5.9 ± 1.4 | 7.7 ± 0.6 | |
| 12.1 ± 8.8* | 15.5 ± 11.0* | 0.13 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.03 | 0.90 ± 0.21 | 1.04 ± 0.12 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 6.8 ± 1.2 | 9.0 ± 0.2 | |
| 11.4 ± 1.6 | 14.0 ± 5.6 | 0.15 ± 0.00 | 0.20 ± 0.02 | 0.81 ± 0.45 | 0.93 ± 0.12 | 1.2 ± 0.1 | 6.5 ± 1.3 | 8.4 ± 1.3 | |
| 9.6 ± 2.5 | 12.5 ± 2.6 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 0.69 ± 0.19 | 1.02 ± 0.01 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 6.6 ± 0.9 | 8.7 ± 0.7 | |
Statistical analysis was performed as described in Table 1. In bold font mean values and standard deviations from the mean are given for all independent measurements of the preceding groups, respectively. Asterisks denote a group that showed high variance between replicate measurements for copper and manganese
Fig. 2Correlation between body copper content and pigmentation strength in D. melanogaster. For each metal, we plotted the mean value (in mg [metal]/g body dry weight) for L, C and D strains, respectively; on the X-axis the result from the selection experiment and on the Y-axis the result from the mutation experiment. The intensity of coloration of the circles corresponds to the intensity of coloration of the pigments. Linear regression analysis was performed for copper and iron because these were the only metals for which L, C and D flies were distributed along the X-axis in direct relation to their pigmentation. The positive correlation between the two experiments for copper suggests that darker flies accumulate more copper in their bodies