Literature DB >> 25289639

Phylogenetic analysis of the spider mite sub-family Tetranychinae (Acari: Tetranychidae) based on the mitochondrial COI gene and the 18S and the 5' end of the 28S rRNA genes indicates that several genera are polyphyletic.

Tomoko Matsuda1, Maiko Morishita1, Norihide Hinomoto2, Tetsuo Gotoh1.   

Abstract

The spider mite sub-family Tetranychinae includes many agricultural pests. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal RNA genes and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of mitochondrial DNA have been used for species identification and phylogenetic reconstruction within the sub-family Tetranychinae, although they have not always been successful. The 18S and 28S rRNA genes should be more suitable for resolving higher levels of phylogeny, such as tribes or genera of Tetranychinae because these genes evolve more slowly and are made up of conserved regions and divergent domains. Therefore, we used both the 18S (1,825-1,901 bp) and 28S (the 5' end of 646-743 bp) rRNA genes to infer phylogenetic relationships within the sub-family Tetranychinae with a focus on the tribe Tetranychini. Then, we compared the phylogenetic tree of the 18S and 28S genes with that of the mitochondrial COI gene (618 bp). As observed in previous studies, our phylogeny based on the COI gene was not resolved because of the low bootstrap values for most nodes of the tree. On the other hand, our phylogenetic tree of the 18S and 28S genes revealed several well-supported clades within the sub-family Tetranychinae. The 18S and 28S phylogenetic trees suggest that the tribes Bryobiini, Petrobiini and Eurytetranychini are monophyletic and that the tribe Tetranychini is polyphyletic. At the genus level, six genera for which more than two species were sampled appear to be monophyletic, while four genera (Oligonychus, Tetranychus, Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus) appear to be polyphyletic. The topology presented here does not fully agree with the current morphology-based taxonomy, so that the diagnostic morphological characters of Tetranychinae need to be reconsidered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25289639      PMCID: PMC4188524          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

The spider mite sub-family Tetranychinae includes some pests that cause serious economic losses throughout the world [1], [2], [3]. The family consists of more than 1,200 species, some of which have a wide host range, whereas others are highly host-specific [4], [5]. For example, Tetranychus urticae Koch, Panonychus citri (McGregor) and Oligonychus coffeae (Nietner), have an especially strong effect on agricultural and horticultural crops, and they are polyphagous. However, these genera also include mono-, oligophagous species, such as Tetranychus bambusae Wang & Ma, Panonychus bambusicola Ehara & Gotoh, Oligonychus orthius Rimando, Oligonychus modestus (Banks) and Oligonychus rubicundus Ehara which inhabit only gramineous plants. Although exact species identification is the first step in any biological study, spider mites are difficult to distinguish by morphological characters alone because of their small size (<0.5 mm) and limited number of diagnostic characters [6], [7], [8]. Therefore, the use of DNA-based methods to identify species has increasingly been used for some genera of the Tetranychinae. For example, Navajas and Boursot [9] showed that T. urticae and Tetranychus turkestani Ugarov & Nikolskii, which are very closely related species, can be identified by using the internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) region of nuclear ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes. More recently, Matsuda et al. [10], [11] revealed that almost all species of Japanese Oligonychus (17 of 18 species) and all species of Tetranychus (13 species) can be identified by using the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene of mitochondrial DNA. Despite recent advances in DNA-based methods for identifying spider mites, most phylogenetic relationships of sub-families, tribes and genera of the Tetranychinae remain poorly understood, as is reflected by the low support values for most nodes of the phylogenetic trees. However, phylogenetic trees clearly show that the genus Oligonychus is polyphyletic. Navajas et al. [12] and Ros and Breeuwer [13] analyzed the phylogeny of Tetranychinae including three Oligonychus species (Oligonychus ununguis (Jacobi), Oligonychus platani (McGregor) and Oligonychus gossypii (Zacher)) using the COI gene. Although these three species have the same empodium shape, O. gossypii, whose aedeagus curves dorsally, can be easily distinguished from O. ununguis and O. platani whose aedeagi curve ventrally. In the phylogenetic trees of these two studies, O. gossypii clustered more closely with Tetranychus species whose aedeagi also curve dorsally, while O. ununguis and O. platani formed a separate group. Polyphyly in the genus Oligonychus was also reported in the ITS2 region [14]. The unresolved phylogeny among the taxa of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the COI sequences is probably due to the strongly biased nucleotide composition and the saturation at the third codon positions [13]. Because both the 18S and 28S rRNA genes evolve more slowly and are made up of conserved regions and divergent domains [15], these genes have been used for phylogenetic analyses of higher taxonomic relationships (from “phyla” to “classes” within Ecdysozoa) [16], [17]. In resolving tick genera (Acari: Ixodida), combining the 18S and 28S rRNA genes provided more detailed relationships than did the 18S gene alone [18], [19]. Therefore, we used both the 18S (1,825–1,901 bp) and 28S (the 5′ end of 646–743 bp) rRNA genes to infer phylogenetic relationships within the sub-family Tetranychinae. Then, we compared the trees based on the 18S and 28S genes with the tree based on the mitochondrial COI gene (618 bp). Another problem in previous studies [12], [13], [14] was that only 16 to 25 species were used for the phylogenetic analyses. Limited taxon sampling can seriously influence the resulting phylogenetic inferences (for reviews, see [20], [21], [22]). Therefore, to assess the phylogenetic relationships among tribes and genera of the sub-family Tetranychinae, we examined a total of 88 strains (15 genera and 4 tribes) most of which were from Japan.

Results

Mitochondrial COI gene

We obtained the COI sequences of 38 strains determined in this study (Table 1) and 30 strains from previously published data [10], [11]. The COI sequences contained no insertions or deletions. After alignment, the COI fragment had 618 nucleotides, of which 282 were parsimony-informative sites (File S1). The AT contents of the COI sequences of the tetranychid mites were very high (75.5%), especially at the 3rd codon position (93.0%). Chi-square tests revealed no significant heterogeneity in the first and second codon positions of the COI sequences, but significant heterogeneity at third codon positions (Figure 1). Similar high AT contents have been observed in previous studies of tetranychid mites [10], [11], [12], [13].
Table 1

Classification and sources of Tetranychid mites used in this study.

Sub-familyTribeGenusSpeciesDateLocalityHost plantVoucher specimen no.a Accession no.
COI18S28S
BryobiinaeBryobiini Bryobia B. eharai Pritchard & KeiferSept. 11, 2012Ibaraki, Japan Chrysanthemum morifolium 0612AB926227AB926318
B. praetiosa KochJuly 27, 2008Hokkaido, Japan Trifolium repens 0609AB981203AB926228AB926319
Petrobiini Petrobia P. latens (Müller)Mar. 30, 2012Tokushima, Japan Daucus carota 0482AB981204AB926229AB926320
Tetranychina T. harti (Ewing)June 11, 2012Ibaraki, Japan Oxalis corniculata 0602AB926230AB926321
TetranychinaeEurytetranychini Eurytetranychoides E. japonicus (Ehara)Sept. 22, 2010Tokyo, Japan Lithocarpus edulis 0493AB981205AB926231AB926322
Eutetranychus E. africanus (Tucker)June 30, 2008Taichung, Taiwan Pueraria montana 0377AB926232AB926323
Aponychus A. corpuzae RimandoApr. 10, 2001Ibaraki, Japan Sasa senanensis 0607AB981206AB926233AB926324
A. firmianae (Ma & Yuan)Aug. 7, 2010Ibaraki, Japan Firmiana simplex 0405AB926234AB926325
Tetranychini Panonychus P. bambusicola Ehara & GotohJune 4, 1989Hokkaido, Japan Sasa senanensis 0606AB981207AB926235AB926326
P. caglei MellotAug. 19, 2009Okinawa, Japan Trichosanthes pilosa 0611AB926236AB926327
P. citri (McGregor)May 6, 1993Ibaraki, Japan Ilex crenata 0226AB981208AB926237AB926328
P. elongatus MansonJuly 27, 2010Hangzhou, China Broussonetia papyrifera 0398AB926238AB926329
P. mori YokoyamaApr. 22, 2007Hokkaido, Japan Morus australis 0239AB981209AB926239AB926330
P. osmanthi Ehara & GotohNov. 16, 2001Guilin, China Osmanthus fragrans 0229AB981210AB926240AB926331
P. thelytokus Ehara & GotohAug. 4, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Ulmus davidiana 0407AB981211AB926241AB926332
P. ulmi (Koch)Aug. 2, 2012Nagano, Japan Malus pumila 0603AB981212AB926242AB926333
Sasanychus S. akitanus (Ehara)June 23, 1986Hokkaido, Japan Sasa senanensis 0605AB981213AB926243AB926334
S. pusillus Ehara & GotohJuly 31, 2012Hokkaido, Japan Sasa chartacea 0575AB981214AB926244AB926335
Schizotetranychus S. bambusae ReckAug. 27, 2011Chiba, Japan Phyllostachys edulis 0503AB981215AB926245AB926336
S. brevisetosus EharaOct. 13, 2011Kochi, Japan Quercus glauca 0527AB981216AB926246AB926337
S. cercidiphylli EharaAug. 3, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Cercidiphyllum japonicum 0411AB981217AB926247AB926338
S. gilvus Ehara & OhashiMay 22, 2012Nara, Japan Quercus gilva 0549AB981218AB926248AB926339
S. lespedezae Begljarov & MitrofanovAug. 26, 2011Ibaraki, Japan Pueraria montana 0515AB981219AB926249AB926340
S. recki EharaAug. 4, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Sasa senanensis 0408AB981220AB926250AB926341
S. schizopus (Zacher)June 14, 2010Tokyo, Japan Salix integra 0532AB981221AB926251AB926342
S. shii (Ehara)June 14, 2010Tokyo, Japan Castanopsis sieboldii 0533AB981222AB926252AB926343
Stigmaeopsis S. celarius BanksAug. 7, 2011Ibaraki, Japan Pleioblastus chino 0506AB981223AB926253AB926344
S. longus (Saito)June 4, 1989Hokkaido, Japan Sasa senanensis 0542AB981224AB926254AB926345
S. miscanthi (Saito)Feb. 16, 2009Nagasaki, Japan Miscanthus sinensis 0404AB981225AB926255AB926346
S. saharai Saito & MoriAug. 5, 2011Chiba, Japan Pleioblastus chino 0501AB981226AB926256AB926347
S. takahashii Saito & MoriOct. 27, 1997Hokkaido, Japan Sasa senanensis 0541AB981227AB926257AB926348
Yezonychus Y. sapporensis EharaAug. 4, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Sasa senanensis 0406AB981228AB926258AB926349
Eotetranychus E. asiaticus EharaMar. 19, 2007Nagasaki, Japan Citrus reticulata 0546AB981229AB926259AB926350
E. boreus EharaJune 3, 2010Wakayama, Japan Armeniaca mume 0415AB926260AB926351
E. celtis EharaAug. 27, 2011Chiba, Japan Aphananthe aspera 0502AB981230AB926261AB926352
E. cornicola EharaAug. 5, 2011Chiba, Japan Cornus controversa 0498AB981231AB926262AB926353
E. dissectus EharaAug. 3, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Acer pictum 0412AB981232AB926263AB926354
E. nomurai EharaAug. 20, 2011Ibaraki, Japan Celtis sinensis 0514AB981233AB926264AB926355
E. pruni (Oudemans)Sept. 1, 2012Ibaraki, Japan Castanea crenata 0562AB926265AB926356
E. querci ReevesAug. 3, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Tilia japonica 0403AB926266AB926357
E. quercifoliae Ehara & GotohJuly 6, 2011Ibaraki, Japan Quercus serrata 0507AB981234AB926267AB926358
E. rubricans EharaSept. 1, 2012Ibaraki, Japan Carpinus tschonoskii 0559AB926268AB926359
E. smithi Pritchard & BakerAug. 14, 2007Nagasaki, Japan Rosa multiflora 0545AB981235AB926269AB926360
E. spectabilis EharaSept. 7, 2011Hokkaido, Japan Acer pictum 0524AB926270AB926361
E. suginamensis (Yokoyama)Aug. 26, 2011Ibaraki, Japan Morus australis 0517AB981236AB926271AB926362
E. tiliarium (Hermann)Aug. 3, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Alnus hirsuta 0409AB926272AB926363
E. toyoshimai Ehara & GotohAug. 29, 2011Iwate, Japan Magnolia obovata 0519AB926273AB926364
E. uchidai EharaAug. 15, 2011Hokkaido, Japan Ulmus davidiana 0528AB981237AB926274AB926365
E. uncatus GarmanAug. 3, 2010Hokkaido, Japan Betula platyphylla 0413AB926275AB926366
Oligonychus O. amiensis Ehara & GotohJuly 13, 2005Ibaraki, Japan Lithocarpus edulis 0116AB683672AB926276AB926367
O. biharensis (Hirst)Dec. 21, 2007Okinawa, Japan Mangifera indica 0012AB683678AB926277AB926368
O. camelliae Ehara & GotohMay 13, 2000Fukushima, Japan Camellia japonica 0082AB683662AB926278AB926369
O. castaneae Ehara & GotohMay 5, 2009Ibaraki, Japan Castanea crenata 0297AB683667AB926279AB926370
O. clavatus (Ehara)July 28, 2009Kanagawa, Japan Pinus thunbergii 0360AB683654AB926280AB926371
O. coffeae (Nietner)May 30, 2005Okinawa, Japan Mangifera indica 0078AB683670AB926281AB926372
O. gotohi EharaJuly 1, 2007Ibaraki, Japan Lithocarpus edulis 0076AB683668AB926282AB926373
O. hondoensis (Ehara)Aug. 22, 2009Aomori, Japan Cryptomeria japonica 0376AB683658AB926283AB926374
O. ilicis (McGregor)Oct. 30, 2000Kagoshima, Japan Camellia sinensis 0081AB683660AB926284AB926375
O. karamatus (Ehara)Aug. 27, 2009Hokkaido, Japan Larix kaempferi 0358AB683656AB926285AB926376
O. modestus (Banks)Sept. 9, 2008Okinawa, Japan Digitaria ciliaris 0092AB683677AB926286AB926377
O. orthius RimandoJuly 9, 2009Okinawa, Japan Saccharum officinarum 0378AB683675AB926287AB926378
O. perditus Pritchard & BakerSept. 17, 2009Kanagawa, Japan Juniperus sp.0364AB683665AB926288AB926379
O. pustulosus EharaAug. 22, 2009Aomori, Japan Cryptomeria japonica 0363AB683655AB926289AB926380
O. rubicundus EharaOct. 17, 2008Kochi, Japan Miscanthus sinensis 0290AB683681AB926290AB926381
O. ununguis (Jacobi)July 27, 2008Hokkaido, Japan Cryptomeria japonica 0088AB683664AB926291AB926382
Amphitetranychus A. quercivorus (Ehara & Gotoh)July 9, 2003Ibaraki, Japan Quercus crispula 0610AB981238AB926292AB926383
A. viennensis (Zacher)Sept. 21, 2010Tokyo, Japan Armeniaca vulgaris 0613AB981239AB926293AB926384
Tetranychus T. bambusae Wang & MaJuly 5, 2009Okinawa, Japan Phyllostachys edulis 0343AB926294AB926385
T. evansi Baker & PritchardNov. 3, 2006Tokyo, Japan Solanum nigrum 0210AB736039AB926295AB926386
T. ezoensis EharaSept. 3, 2008Ibaraki, Japan Taxus cuspidata 0281AB736042AB926296AB926387
T. huhhotensis Ehara, Gotoh & HongJuly 26, 2007Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Mongolia Zea mays 0201AB926297AB926388
T. kanzawai KishidaMay 19, 1993Shizuoka, Japan Thea sinensis 0158AB736043AB926298AB926389
T. lombardinii Baker & PritchardJuly 10, 2008Durban, South Africa Erythrina variegata 0381AB926299AB926390
T. ludeni ZacherOct.17, 1995Ibaraki, Japan Solidago virgaurea 0189AB736051AB926300AB926391
T. macfarlanei Baker & PritchardSept. 30, 2008Mymensingh, Bangladesh Dolichos lablab 0389AB926301AB926392
T. merganser BoudreauxApr. 6, 2007El Talo, Sonora, Mexico Cucurbita maxima 0225AB926302AB926393
T. misumaiensis Ehara & GotohAug. 23, 2005Hokkaido, Japan Apios sp.0218AB736054AB926303AB926394
T. neocaledonicus AndreMay 27, 1998Tokyo, Japan Morus australis 0192AB736055AB926304AB926395
T. okinawanus EharaJune 19, 2003Okinawa, Japan Pueraria montana 0208AB736058AB926305AB926396
T. parakanzawai EharaJune 5, 1993Ibaraki, Japan Pueraria montana 0155AB736060AB926306AB926397
T. phaselus EharaJune 29, 2000Ibaraki, Japan Glycine max 0191AB736066AB926307AB926398
T. piercei McGregorDec. 20, 2007Okinawa, Japan Cucumis melo 0014AB736068AB926308AB926399
T. pueraricola Ehara & GotohOct. 23, 1993Ibaraki, Japan Pueraria montana 0203AB736071AB926309AB926400
T. truncatus EharaMay 8, 2004Kyoto, Japan Solanum nigrum 0195AB736075AB926310AB926401
T. turkestani Ugarov & NikolskiSept. 15, 2007Hamedan, Iran Phaseolus vulgaris 0219AB981240AB926311AB926402
T. urticae Koch (green form)July 16, 2001Hokkaido, Japan Citrullus lanatus 0181AB736076AB926312AB926403
T. urticae Koch (red form)Aug. 27, 2001Nagano, Japan Dianthus sp.0171AB736079AB926313AB926404
T. zeae Ehara, Gotoh & HongJuly 26, 2007Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Mongolia Zea mays 0202AB926314AB926405

Voucher specimens are preserved at the Laboratory of Applied Entomology and Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University under the serial voucher specimen number.

Figure 1

Base compositions of the codons of the mitochondrial COI gene.

(A) All codon positions, (B) 1st codon position, (C) 2nd codon position, (D) 3rd codon position, averaged over all 68 mite strains used in this study. Error bars depict range. Results of the homogeneity test are given for each codon position.

Base compositions of the codons of the mitochondrial COI gene.

(A) All codon positions, (B) 1st codon position, (C) 2nd codon position, (D) 3rd codon position, averaged over all 68 mite strains used in this study. Error bars depict range. Results of the homogeneity test are given for each codon position. Voucher specimens are preserved at the Laboratory of Applied Entomology and Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University under the serial voucher specimen number. A phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the COI gene is shown in Figure 2. Among the eight genera for which more than two strains were sampled, four genera (Panonychus, Sasanychus, Stigmaeopsis and Amphitetranychus) appear to be monophyletic with >80 bootstrap values, while the other four (Oligonychus, Tetranychus, Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus) are polyphyletic. The four monophyletic genera are in clades 8, 3, 5 and 2, respectively (Figure 2). As was observed in previous studies, Oligonychus species whose aedeagus curves ventrally (clade 7) can be easily distinguished from Oligonychus biharensis (Hirst), O. modestus, O. orthius and O. rubicundus whose aedeagi curve dorsally. Although Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus are scattered across the tree, some species formed well-supported clades. Schizotetranychus bambusae Reck & Schizotetranychus recki Ehara clustered with Sasanychus and Yezonychus species (clade 4). The clade including Schizotetranychus cercidiphylli Ehara, Eotetranychus asiaticus Ehara and Eotetranychus cornicola Ehara are supported with high bootstrap value (clade 6: bootstrap value (BP) = 88). The COI tree also shows monophyly of closely related species that morphologically and molecularly resemble each other, such as P. citri and Panonychus osmanthi Ehara & Gotoh [23], [24] (clade 9) and T. urticae and T. turkestani [9] (clade 1). These results are consistent with the 18S and 28S topologies described below. However, the COI phylogeny was not resolved and the deep-level relationships were especially unresolved, as shown by the low bootstrap values (Figure 2), as was observed in previous studies [12], [13]. The deep-level phylogeny of the sub-family Tetranychinae was also not resolved in the Bayesian tree (data not shown).
Figure 2

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the mitochondrial COI gene using the GTR Gamma model.

Bootstrap values (>50%) based on 1,000 replications are indicated at nodes. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by the voucher specimen no. and scientific name. Black circles with numbers indicate the clade no. which corresponds with the article.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the mitochondrial COI gene using the GTR Gamma model.

Bootstrap values (>50%) based on 1,000 replications are indicated at nodes. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by the voucher specimen no. and scientific name. Black circles with numbers indicate the clade no. which corresponds with the article.

18S and 28S rRNA genes

We determined the 18S and the 5′ end of the 28S rRNA sequences of all 88 strains used in this study (Table 1). The lengths of the 18S sequences obtained were 1,825–1,901 bp. The 18S and 28S sequences contained a number of gaps (insertions and deletions). After alignment and deletion of the ambiguous part of the aligned data, the final length was 1,863 bp, containing 495 parsimony-informative sites. The lengths of the 28S sequences were 646–743 bp, with a final length of 671 bp, containing 201 parsimony-informative sites. The aligned sequences before and after deleting the ambiguous parts are shown in Supporting Information (Files S2–S4). Chi-square tests revealed no significant heterogeneity in the nucleotide composition of the 18S and 28S sequences (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Base compositions of the (A) 18S and (B) 28S rRNA genes, averaged over all 88 mite strains used in this study.

Error bars depict range. Results of the homogeneity test are given for each gene.

Base compositions of the (A) 18S and (B) 28S rRNA genes, averaged over all 88 mite strains used in this study.

Error bars depict range. Results of the homogeneity test are given for each gene. Phylogenetic trees based on a single gene were not as well resolved as phylogenetic trees based on the combined 18S and 28S data sets. Therefore, only the combined data set was used for the ML and Bayesian analyses. The 18S and 28S trees suggest that the tribes Bryobiini and Petrobiini of the sub-family Bryobiinae, which were used as outgroups, are both monophyletic (Figures 4A and 5A, clades 22 and 23). Within the Tetranychinae, Clade 15 is composed of species of Eurytetranychini, and clades 12,17 and 20 are composed of species of Tetranychini (Figures 4A and 5A). Among the 10 genera for which more than two strains were sampled, six genera (Bryobia, Aponychus, Panonychus, Sasanychus, Stigmaeopsis and Amphitetranychus), appear to be monophyletic with >95 bootstrap values and 1.00 posterior probabilities, while four genera (Oligonychus, Tetranychus, Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus) are polyphyletic. The monophyletic genera are in clades 22, 14, 5, 7, 17 and 21, respectively (Figures 4A–4D and 5A–5D). Species of the genus Oligonychus are separated into 2 clades (clades 1 and 19), with the Tetranychus species included in clade 19 (Figures 4B, 4D, 5B and 5D). Schizotetranychus species, with the exception of S. cercidiphylli, are separated into 3 clades (clades 3, 4 and 9), with the Sasanychus and Yezonychus species included in clade 9 (Figures 4B and 5B). In the ML tree (Figures 4B–4C), S. cercidiphylli and Eotetranychus species, with the exception of Eotetranychus uchidai Ehara, are paraphyletic with respect to clade 10. E. uchidai forms a sister group with Panonychus, Sasanychus, Schizotetranychus and Yezonychus species (Figure 4B, clade 8). In the Bayesian tree (Figures 5B–5C), a well-supported clade consisting of S. cercidiphylli and Eotetranychus species, with the exception of E. uchidai (clade 10: Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) = 0.96) clustered with clade 8.
Figure 4

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the 18S and 28S rRNA genes using the GTR Gamma model.

Bootstrap values (>50%) based on 1,000 replications are indicated at nodes. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by the voucher specimen no. and scientific name. Black circles with numbers indicate the clade no. which corresponds with the article. The tree is divided into three sections: (A) The entire tree, (B) Tetranychini-1, (C) Tetranychini-1, Eurytetranychini and Tetranychini-2 and (D) Tetranychini-3.

Figure 5

Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the 18S and 28S rRNA genes using the GTR Gamma model.

Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.50) are indicated at nodes. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by the voucher specimen no. and scientific name. Black circles with numbers indicate the clade no. which corresponds with the article. The tree is divided into three sections: (A) The entire tree, (B) Tetranychini-1, (C) Tetranychini-1, Eurytetranychini and Tetranychini-2 and (D) Tetranychini-3.

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the 18S and 28S rRNA genes using the GTR Gamma model.

Bootstrap values (>50%) based on 1,000 replications are indicated at nodes. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by the voucher specimen no. and scientific name. Black circles with numbers indicate the clade no. which corresponds with the article. The tree is divided into three sections: (A) The entire tree, (B) Tetranychini-1, (C) Tetranychini-1, Eurytetranychini and Tetranychini-2 and (D) Tetranychini-3.

Bayesian phylogenetic tree of the sub-family Tetranychinae based on the 18S and 28S rRNA genes using the GTR Gamma model.

Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.50) are indicated at nodes. Each operational taxonomic unit is indicated by the voucher specimen no. and scientific name. Black circles with numbers indicate the clade no. which corresponds with the article. The tree is divided into three sections: (A) The entire tree, (B) Tetranychini-1, (C) Tetranychini-1, Eurytetranychini and Tetranychini-2 and (D) Tetranychini-3. As was observed in the COI tree, the 18S and 28S trees also show the monophyly of P. citri and P. osmanthi which are closely related species (Figures 4B and 5B, clade 6). S. cercidiphylli forms a well-supported clade with four Eotetranychus species (E. asiaticus, Eotetranychus boreus Ehara, E. cornicola and Eotetranychus toyoshimai Ehara & Gotoh) in both ML and Bayesian trees (Figures 4C and 5C, clade 11: BP/BPP = 93/1.00). On the other hand, closely related Eotetranychus species (Eotetranychus pruni (Oudemans), Eotetranychus querci Reeves and Eotetranychus uncatus Garman), which have long, flagellate and undulate aedeagi [25], did not cluster together in either tree (Figures 4C and 5C).

Discussion

Only a few studies have examined the molecular phylogeny of the sub-family Tetranychinae, and they often used genes or regions that had limited discriminating ability. As observed in previous studies, our tree based on the COI gene did not resolve deep-level phylogeny because of the low bootstrap values for deep nodes of tree (Figure 2). Therefore, we used the 18S and 28S rRNA genes for phylogenetic analyses because of their better discriminating ability. Indeed, our phylogenetic tree of the 18S and 28S sequences revealed several well-supported clades, allowing us to consider the phylogenetic relationships among the sub-family Tetranychinae. Our phylogenetic trees based on the 18S and 28S rRNA genes suggest that the tribes Bryobiini and Petrobiini of the sub-family Bryobiinae are both monophyletic, but the tribe Tetranychini is polyphyletic because the monophyletic clade of Eurytetranychini is placed inside Tetranychini (Figures 4A and 5A). At the generic level, 4 genera (Oligonychus, Tetranychus, Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus) are polyphyletic. The phylogenetic tree separates the Oligonychus species into two clades (Figures 4B, 4D, 5B and 5D, clades 1 and 19). That is, the two clades comprising the genus Oligonychus coincide with their morphology based on the direction of curvature of the aedeagus. These results are in agreement with our COI phylogeny (Figure 2) and previous phylogenies based on the COI gene and ITS2 region [10], [12], [13], [14]. Although phylogenies based on the COI gene and ITS2 region could not establish the exact phylogenetic positions of the two clades of Oligonychus, our tree suggests that species whose aedeagi curve ventrally form a sister group with some of the Schizotetranychus species (Figures 4B and 5B, clade 2) and species whose aedeagi curve dorsally are more closely related to Tetranychus species whose aedeagi also curve dorsally (Figures 4D and 5D, clade 19). Though Oligonychus and Tetranychus can be distinguished by their empodium shape, our phylogenetic trees reveal that the shape of the aedeagi can help to discriminate these two genera. Species of the genus Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus appear to be polyphyletic within clade 12 (Figures 4B–4C and 5B–5C). Puzzlingly, S. cercidiphylli and E. uchidai are separated from other congeneric species in the tree. The placement of Eotetranychus species is different between the ML and Bayesian trees. In the ML tree (Figures 4B–4C), we could not establish the exact phylogenetic position of the species of Eotetranychus which are paraphyletic respect to clade 10 because bootstrap values are relatively low. On the other hand, in the Bayesian tree (Figure 5C), S. cercidiphylli and the Eotetranychus species, with the exception of E. uchidai, clustered into a well-supported clade (clade 10: BPP = 0.96). Similarly, the phylogenetic position of the genus Stigmaeopsis is resolved in the Bayesian analysis but not in the ML analysis. In the ML tree (Figure 4C), Stigmaeopsis species (clade 17) clustered with clade 13, which includes the Eurytetranychini species and some of the Tetranychini species, but the topology is not well supported (clade 16: BP = 50). In the Bayesian tree (Figure 5C), Stigmaeopsis species (clade 17) clustered with clade 13 with high Bayesian posterior probabilities (clade 16: BPP = 0.91). Although our data suggests that the Bayesian tree (Figures 5A–5D) is better supported than the ML tree (Figures 4A–4D), it is common knowledge that posterior probabilities are generally higher than bootstrap values [26]. Phylogenetic trees can be used to assess associations between spider mites and their host plants [13]. In the ML and Bayesian trees (Figures 4D and 5D), Oligonychus and Tetranychus species inhabiting gramineous plants (O. orthius, O. modestus, O. rubicundus and T. bambusae) clustered separately from other species and formed a monophyletic clade (Figures 4D and 5D, clade 18). Clade 4 includes Schizotetranychus brevisetosus Ehara, Schizotetranychus gilvus Ehara & Ohashi and Schizotetranychus shii (Ehara) which inhabit fagaceous plants (Figures 4B and 5B). Clade 9 include species irrespective of genus, which inhabit bamboo plants, Sasanychus akitanus (Ehara), Sasanychus pusillus Ehara & Gotoh, S. bambusae, S. recki and Yezonychus sapporoensis Ehara (Figures 4B and 5B). All Stigmaeopsis species inhabiting gramineous plants are separated from other Tetranychini species and appear to be monophyletic (Figures 4C and 5C, clade 17). These results indicate that the phylogenetic relationships of some species of spider mites are closely linked with their host plant, as reported in other phytophagous arthropods [27], [28], [29]. We consider the phylogenies of the Tetranychinae based on the 18S and 28S rRNA genes to be a major improvement over previous phylogenies because they reveal several well-supported clades that were not distinguished by phylogenetic relationships based on the COI gene and ITS2 region. Our finding that the tribe Tetranychini and four genera (Oligonychus, Tetranychus, Schizotetranychus and Eotetranychus) are polyphyletic indicates that the diagnostic morphological characters of tribes and genera of Tetranychinae need to be reconsidered. Although we examined a large number of species in this study, most of them were collected in Japan. Analyzing a number of undescribed genera remaining throughout the world may help achieve a deeper understanding of the phylogenetic relationships among the family Tetranychinae. In addition, a large number of nuclear genes need to be examined to resolve poorly understood relationships in the ML tree (Figures 4A–4D), such as the phylogenetic positions of the genera Eotetranychus and Stigmaeopsis.

Materials and Methods

Mites

Eighty-four strains representing 12 genera and two tribes in Tetranychinae, were used in this study and four strains of the tribes Bryobiini and Petrobiini of the sub-family Bryobiinae (Acari: Tetranychidae) were used as outgroups (Table 1). Mite samples that could be reared in the laboratory were maintained on leaf discs of common bean leaves (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), mulberry leaves (Morus bombycis Koidz.) or the original host plants placed on a water-saturated polyurethane mat in a plastic dish (90 mm diameter, 20 mm depth) at 25°C under a 16L-8D photoperiod until analysis. Samples that could not be maintained in the laboratory and samples that were imported from abroad were preserved in 99.5% ethanol for molecular analyses and 70% ethanol for morphological identification. Specimens were mounted in Hoyer’s medium and identified under phase-contrast and differential interference-contrast microscopes. Voucher specimens are preserved at the Laboratory of Applied Entomology and Zoology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ibaraki University under the serial voucher specimen numbers (Table 1).

DNA extraction, amplification, cloning and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted from the whole body of each female individual by using a Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Promega). Live female individuals for DNA samples and female individuals for voucher specimen were obtained from the same leaf discs. A few of the strains could not be maintained in the laboratory. For these strains, DNA samples were obtained from ethanol-preserved female individuals. The PCR primers are given in Table 2. The mitochondrial COI fragments were amplified using primer sets C1-J-1718 [30] and COI REVA [8] for species of 12 genera (Bryobia, Petrobia, Eurytetranychoides, Aponychus, Panonychus, Sasanychus, Schizotetranychus, Yezonychus, Eotetranychus, Oligonychus, Amphitetranychus and Tetranychus) and primer sets C1-J-1718-stig and COI REVA-stig for species of the genus Stigmaeopsis. COI sequences for Oligonychus and Tetranychus species were obtained from previously published data [10], [11]. PCR amplification was performed with the following profile: 3 min at 94°C, followed by 35 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 1 min at 45°C for COI, 60°C for 28S and 65°C for 18S and 1.5 min at 72°C. An additional 10 min at 72°C was allowed for last strand elongation. The resultant DNA solutions were purified by using MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced directly. Sequencing was carried out using the sequencing primers (Table 2) with a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit v.3.1 (Applied Biosystems) and on an ABI 3130×l automated sequencer.
Table 2

Primers used in polymerase chain reaction amplification and sequencing of the mitochondrial COI gene and the 18S and 28S rRNA genes.

Primer nameSequenceApplicationReferences
COI
C1-J-1718Forward primer 5′-GGAGGATTTGGAAATTGATTAGTTCC-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingSimon et al. [30]
COI REVAReverse primer 5′-GATAAAACGTAATGAAAATGAGCTAC-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingGotoh et al. [8]
C1-J-1718-stigForward primer 5′-GGAGGTTTTGGTAATTGGTTAATCCC-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingThis study
COI REVA-stigReverse primer 5′-GAAAGAACATAATGAAAATGAGCAAC-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingThis study
18S
18S-1FForward primer 5′-ACCGCGAATGGCTCATTAAATCAGTT-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingThis study
18S-2FForward primer 5′-TGGCCTCTGAGCCGACGATGTAT-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-2RReverse primer 5′-ACCCCATAGGTTCGACTGAAATC-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-5RReverse primer 5′-TCCAATAGATCCTCGTTAAAGGAT-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-8RReverse primer 5′-TCTCGTTCGTTATCGGAATTAAC-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-9FForward primer 5′-AGCTTCCGGGAAACCAAAGTTT-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-9RReverse primer 5′-AGGGCATCACAGACCTGTTATT-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-10FForward primer 5′-AGTTGGTGGAGTGATTTGTCTGGT-3′ SequencingThis study
18S-10RReverse primer 5′-ACAAAGGGCAGGGACGTAATCAA-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingThis study
28S
28v-5′Forward primer 5′-AAGGTAGCCAAATGCCTCATC-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingHillis and Dixon [31], Palumbi [32]
28jj-3′Reverse primer 5′-AGTAGGGTAAAACTAACCT-3′ PCR amplification & sequencingHillis and Dixon [31], Palumbi [32]

Data analysis

All sequences obtained were deposited in DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank International Nucleotide Sequence Databases under the accession numbers AB981203 to AB981240, AB926227 to AB926314 and AB926318 to AB926405 (Table 1). Sequences were aligned using the 'auto' option of the MAFFT software [33]. Gaps (insertions and deletions) included in the 18S and 28S rRNA sequences were treated using the 'automated1' option of the trimAl software [34], which trimmed ambiguous sites by using a heuristic selection of the automatic method based on similarity statistics. The homogeneity of nucleotide composition was checked using chi-square tests implemented in PAUP* version 4.0b10 software [35]. Maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian phylogenetic trees were constructed with RAxML [36] and MrBayes5D [37], respectively. We used the tribes Bryobiini and Petrobiini of the sub-family Bryobiinae as outgroups to root the tree. For all analyses, we used the GTR Gamma model selected by the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) using the program Kakusan4 [38]. The RAxML search was executed for the best-scoring ML tree in one single program run (the ‘-f a' option) instead of the default maximum parsimony-starting tree. Statistical support was evaluated with 1,000 rapid bootstrap inferences. The MrBayes5D analyses were implemented with two parallel runs of 10 million generations each and using one cold and two incrementally heated Markov chains and sampling every 100 steps. Tracer v.1.6 [39] was used to assess if the search had reached stationarity and to check whether the sample sizes for each parameter (ESS>100) were adequate. The first 10% of the trees were discarded as burn-in and the consensus tree with Bayesian posterior probabilities was constructed based on the trees sampled after the burn-in. Aligned COI sequences in FASTA format. (ZIP) Click here for additional data file. Aligned 18S sequences in FASTA format. (ZIP) Click here for additional data file. Aligned 28S sequences in FASTA format. (ZIP) Click here for additional data file. Aligned 18S sequences after deleting the ambiguous parts in FASTA format. (ZIP) Click here for additional data file. Aligned 28S sequences after deleting the ambiguous parts in FASTA format. (ZIP) Click here for additional data file.
  23 in total

1.  Nuclear ribosomal DNA monophyly versus mitochondrial DNA polyphyly in two closely related mite species: the influence of life history and molecular drive.

Authors:  M Navajas; P Boursot
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Increased taxon sampling is advantageous for phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  David D Pollock; Derrick J Zwickl; Jimmy A McGuire; David M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  Ecdysozoan phylogeny and Bayesian inference: first use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA gene sequences to classify the arthropods and their kin.

Authors:  Jon M Mallatt; James R Garey; Jeffrey W Shultz
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  Resolution of phylogenetic conflict in large data sets by increased taxon sampling.

Authors:  Shannon M Hedtke; Ted M Townsend; David M Hillis
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 15.683

5.  RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models.

Authors:  Alexandros Stamatakis
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-08-23       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 6.  Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference.

Authors:  D M Hillis; M T Dixon
Journal:  Q Rev Biol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.875

7.  Further use of nearly complete 28S and 18S rRNA genes to classify Ecdysozoa: 37 more arthropods and a kinorhynch.

Authors:  Jon Mallatt; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 4.286

8.  A molecular phylogenetic analysis of the "true thrushes" (Aves: Turdinae).

Authors:  John Klicka; Gary Voelker; Garth M Spellman
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Interspecific diversity of mitochondrial COI sequences in Japanese Panonychus species (Acari: Tetranychidae).

Authors:  S Toda; M Osakabe; S Komazaki
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.132

10.  Phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genomes and nuclear rRNA genes of ticks reveals a deep phylogenetic structure within the genus Haemaphysalis and further elucidates the polyphyly of the genus Amblyomma with respect to Amblyomma sphenodonti and Amblyomma elaphense.

Authors:  Thomas D Burger; Renfu Shao; Stephen C Barker
Journal:  Ticks Tick Borne Dis       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 3.744

View more
  15 in total

1.  Photoperiodic control of reproductive arrest in the oak-inhabiting spider mite Schizotetranychus brevisetosus (Acari: Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Naoya Oda; Katsura Ito
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 2.132

2.  Lethal male combats in Schizotetranychus brevisetosus (Acari: Tetranychidae) on blue Japanese oak (Quercus glauca).

Authors:  Chieko Masuda; Kaori Tamura; Younghae Chae; Tatsuya Fukuda; Ryo Arakawa; Katsura Ito; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  Molecular identification and phylogenetic analysis of spider mites (Prostigmata: Tetranychidae) of Turkey.

Authors:  Emre İnak; Sultan Çobanoğlu; Philippe Auger; Alain Migeon
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2022-07-20       Impact factor: 2.380

4.  Development and Validation of a Real-Time PCR Assay for Rapid Detection of Two-Spotted Spider Mite, Tetranychus urticae (Acari: Tetranychidae).

Authors:  Dongmei Li; Qing-Hai Fan; David W Waite; Disna Gunawardana; Sherly George; Lalith Kumarasinghe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-06       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Molecular and phenotypic variations in Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) populations from Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Jawwad Hassan Mirza; Muhammad Kamran; Amgad A Saleh; Fahad Jaber Alatawi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Phylogeny of the spider mite sub-family Tetranychinae (Acari: Tetranychidae) inferred from RNA-Seq data.

Authors:  Tomoko Matsuda; Toshinori Kozaki; Kazuo Ishii; Tetsuo Gotoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A New Prevalent Densovirus Discovered in Acari. Insight from Metagenomics in Viral Communities Associated with Two-Spotted Mite (Tetranychus urticae) Populations.

Authors:  Sarah François; Doriane Mutuel; Alison B Duncan; Leonor R Rodrigues; Celya Danzelle; Sophie Lefevre; Inês Santos; Marie Frayssinet; Emmanuel Fernandez; Denis Filloux; Philippe Roumagnac; Rémy Froissart; Mylène Ogliastro
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 5.048

8.  Phylogeography of lethal male fighting in a social spider mite.

Authors:  Yukie Sato; Yoshiaki Tsuda; Hironori Sakamoto; Martijn Egas; Tetsuo Gotoh; Yutaka Saito; Yan-Xuan Zhang; Jian-Zhen Lin; Jung-Tai Chao; Atsushi Mochizuki
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Screening of spider mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) for reproductive endosymbionts reveals links between co-infection and evolutionary history.

Authors:  Yan-Kai Zhang; Ya-Ting Chen; Kun Yang; Ge-Xia Qiao; Xiao-Yue Hong
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Generalist and Specialist Mite Herbivores Induce Similar Defense Responses in Maize and Barley but Differ in Susceptibility to Benzoxazinoids.

Authors:  Huyen Bui; Robert Greenhalgh; Alice Ruckert; Gunbharpur S Gill; Sarah Lee; Ricardo A Ramirez; Richard M Clark
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.753

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.