Literature DB >> 25281950

A nonvoxel-based dose convolution/superposition algorithm optimized for scalable GPU architectures.

J Neylon1, K Sheng1, V Yu1, Q Chen2, D A Low1, P Kupelian1, A Santhanam1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Real-time adaptive planning and treatment has been infeasible due in part to its high computational complexity. There have been many recent efforts to utilize graphics processing units (GPUs) to accelerate the computational performance and dose accuracy in radiation therapy. Data structure and memory access patterns are the key GPU factors that determine the computational performance and accuracy. In this paper, the authors present a nonvoxel-based (NVB) approach to maximize computational and memory access efficiency and throughput on the GPU.
METHODS: The proposed algorithm employs a ray-tracing mechanism to restructure the 3D data sets computed from the CT anatomy into a nonvoxel-based framework. In a process that takes only a few milliseconds of computing time, the algorithm restructured the data sets by ray-tracing through precalculated CT volumes to realign the coordinate system along the convolution direction, as defined by zenithal and azimuthal angles. During the ray-tracing step, the data were resampled according to radial sampling and parallel ray-spacing parameters making the algorithm independent of the original CT resolution. The nonvoxel-based algorithm presented in this paper also demonstrated a trade-off in computational performance and dose accuracy for different coordinate system configurations. In order to find the best balance between the computed speedup and the accuracy, the authors employed an exhaustive parameter search on all sampling parameters that defined the coordinate system configuration: zenithal, azimuthal, and radial sampling of the convolution algorithm, as well as the parallel ray spacing during ray tracing. The angular sampling parameters were varied between 4 and 48 discrete angles, while both radial sampling and parallel ray spacing were varied from 0.5 to 10 mm. The gamma distribution analysis method (γ) was used to compare the dose distributions using 2% and 2 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement criteria, respectively. Accuracy was investigated using three distinct phantoms with varied geometries and heterogeneities and on a series of 14 segmented lung CT data sets. Performance gains were calculated using three 256 mm cube homogenous water phantoms, with isotropic voxel dimensions of 1, 2, and 4 mm.
RESULTS: The nonvoxel-based GPU algorithm was independent of the data size and provided significant computational gains over the CPU algorithm for large CT data sizes. The parameter search analysis also showed that the ray combination of 8 zenithal and 8 azimuthal angles along with 1 mm radial sampling and 2 mm parallel ray spacing maintained dose accuracy with greater than 99% of voxels passing the γ test. Combining the acceleration obtained from GPU parallelization with the sampling optimization, the authors achieved a total performance improvement factor of >175 000 when compared to our voxel-based ground truth CPU benchmark and a factor of 20 compared with a voxel-based GPU dose convolution method.
CONCLUSIONS: The nonvoxel-based convolution method yielded substantial performance improvements over a generic GPU implementation, while maintaining accuracy as compared to a CPU computed ground truth dose distribution. Such an algorithm can be a key contribution toward developing tools for adaptive radiation therapy systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25281950     DOI: 10.1118/1.4895822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  VMAT optimization with dynamic collimator rotation.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Analytical modeling and feasibility study of a multi-GPU cloud-based server (MGCS) framework for non-voxel-based dose calculations.

Authors:  J Neylon; Y Min; P Kupelian; D A Low; A Santhanam
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Parallel beamlet dose calculation via beamlet contexts in a distributed multi-GPU framework.

Authors:  Ryan Neph; Cheng Ouyang; John Neylon; Youming Yang; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  A novel optimization framework for VMAT with dynamic gantry couch rotation.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Victoria Y Yu; Dan Ruan; Ryan Neph; Daniel O'Connor; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Fraction-variant beam orientation optimization for non-coplanar IMRT.

Authors:  Daniel O'Connor; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; Dan Ruan; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  A comprehensive formulation for volumetric modulated arc therapy planning.

Authors:  Dan Nguyen; Qihui Lyu; Dan Ruan; Daniel O'Connor; Daniel A Low; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.071

7.  Treatment planning comparison of IMPT, VMAT and 4π radiotherapy for prostate cases.

Authors:  Angelia Tran; Jingjing Zhang; Kaley Woods; Victoria Yu; Dan Nguyen; Gary Gustafson; Lane Rosen; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  ROAD: ROtational direct Aperture optimization with a Decoupled ring-collimator for FLASH radiotherapy.

Authors:  Qihui Lyu; Ryan Neph; Daniel O'Connor; Dan Ruan; Salime Boucher; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 3.609

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.