| Literature DB >> 25281869 |
Mario M Dorostkar1, Steffen Burgold1, Severin Filser2, Stefan Barghorn3, Boris Schmidt4, Upendra Rao Anumala4, Heinz Hillen3, Corinna Klein3, Jochen Herms5.
Abstract
Cognitive decline in Alzheimer's disease is attributed to loss of functional synapses, most likely caused by synaptotoxic, oligomeric forms of amyloid-β. Many treatment options aim at reducing amyloid-β levels in the brain, either by decreasing its production or by increasing its clearance. We quantified the effects of immunotherapy directed against oligomeric amyloid-β in Tg2576 mice, a mouse model of familial Alzheimer's disease. Treatment of 12-month-old mice with oligomer-specific (A-887755) or conformation-unspecific (6G1) antibodies for 8 weeks did not affect fibrillar plaque density or growth. We also quantified densities of DLG4 (previously known as PSD95) expressing post-synapses and synapsin expressing presynapses immunohistochemically. We found that both pre- and post-synapses were strongly reduced in the vicinity of plaques, whereas distant from plaques, in the cortex and hippocampal CA1 field, only post-synapses were reduced. Immunotherapy alleviated this synapse loss. Synapse loss was completely abolished distant from plaques, whereas it was only attenuated in the vicinity of plaques. These results suggest that fibrillar plaques may act as reservoirs for synaptotoxic, oligomeric amyloid-β and that sequestering oligomers suffices to counteract synaptic pathology. Therefore, cognitive function may be improved by immunotherapy even when the load of fibrillar amyloid remains unchanged.Entities:
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease pathology; amyloid-β oligomers; immunotherapy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 25281869 PMCID: PMC4240293 DOI: 10.1093/brain/awu280
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain ISSN: 0006-8950 Impact factor: 13.501
Figure 1Anti-amyloid immunotherapy with 6G1 and A-887755 antibodies has no effect on fibrillar plaque growth and density. 6G1 recognize monomeric, oligomeric and fibrillar amyloid-β (Aβ), A-887755 recognizes only oligomeric amyloid-β. (A) Timeline of experimental procedures. Methoxy-X04 was applied 24 h before in vivo imaging, immunotherapy was administered immediately afterwards. (B) Chronic in vivo imaging of fibrillar plaques. Maximum intensity projections of volumes are shown, while analyses were performed in 3D. Changes from the previous time points are colour-coded. Scale bars = 10 µm. (C) Overall plaque densities at the last imaging session (8 weeks). (D) Volumes of pre-existing plaques, i.e. plaques that were present at the first imaging session, and (E) volumes of newborn plaques, i.e. plaques that appeared during the treatment period. (F) Linear growth rates of pre-existing plaques. Linear growth is proportional to the cube root of the differences of plaque volumes. (G) Linear growth rates of newborn plaques. (C–G) Box-and-whiskers plots show median, 25th and 75th percentiles (box) as well as minimum and maximum values (whiskers). Groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. No significant differences were found between groups (P > 0.05).
Figure 3Synapse density measurements in the proximity of fibrillar plaques. (A) Fibrillar plaques were stained with methoxy-X04, glutamatergic post-synapses were immunostained with anti-DLG4 (PSD-95) antibodies and presynapses with anti-synapsin antibodies. (B) Automatically detected DLG4-positive punctae overlaid on a distance transform highlighting the distances from the fibrillar plaque (white) in 5-µm wide bins (grey scale). (C) Automatically detected synapsin-positive punctae overlaid on a distance transform. (D) Quantification of the densities of DLG4-positive punctae as a monophasic association function of the distance from the fibrillar plaque. (E) Quantification of the densities of synapsin-positive punctae as a monophasic association function of the distance from the fibrillar plaque. (A–C) Scale bars = 10 µm. (D–E) Dashed lines indicate wild-type levels.
Figure 2Synapse density measurements distant from plaques. (A) Synapse densities were quantified in floating sections stained with antibodies against DLG4 and synapsin. The regions analysed were cortical layers 2/3, hippocampal field CA1, stratum oriens (CA1 Or) and stratum radiatum (CA1 Rad) and the dentate gyrus molecular layer (DG LMol) in areas at least 50 µm distant from the closest fibrillar plaque. (B) DLG4 stained cortex of a wild-type mouse. Scale bar = 10 µm. (C) Automatically detected synaptic punctae in the square region highlighted in B. Scale bar = 5 µm. (D) DLG4 stained cortex of a Tg2576 mouse treated with control antibodies (IgG2a). Scale bar = 10 µm. (E) Automatically detected synaptic punctae in the square region highlighted in D. Scale bar = 5 µm. (F) Quantification of DLG4-positive punctae in the respective brain regions. (G) Quantification of synapsin-positive punctae in the respective brain regions. (H) Quantification of DLG4-positive punctae in the cortex and CA1 stratum radiatum of animals treated with control (IgG2a) antibodies, with conformation-unspecific (6G1) or oligomer-specific (A-887755) antibodies. Synapse densities were normalized to values in control animals treated with the same antibody. (F–H) n = 4 (wild-type) to 6 (Tg2576). (F) *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 (t-test). (H) **P < 0.01, one-sample t-test.
Wt = wild-type; n.s. = not significant. PSD-95 is now known as DLG4.