Literature DB >> 25280948

Is early treatment of cam-type femoroacetabular impingement the key to avoiding associated full thickness isolated chondral defects?

Tim Claßen1, Konrad Körsmeier2, Michael Kamminga2, Sascha Beck3, Jan Rekowski4, Marcus Jäger3, Stefan Landgraeber3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Hip arthroscopy is a safe and reproducible method for treating femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and has evolved greatly in recent years. But little is known about the influences on the outcome after surgery. The aims of the current study were to elucidate (1) which parameters can be used as a marker for the presence of chondral and labral lesions, (2) the postoperative clinical outcome, and (3) at which time after surgery recovery occurs.
METHODS: A prospective study was performed with 177 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy because of cam-type FAI. The patients were examined preoperatively as well as 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, and their condition was rated according to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS). Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the influence of independent factors such as "patient age," "pain duration before surgery" on the clinical outcome, and the appearance of chondral or labral defects.
RESULTS: The NAHS and WOMAC scores showed a significant enhancement 6 weeks after surgery. Only the NAHS showed a further improvement after 6 months. A positive correlation with the dependent variable "chondral lesion" was evaluated for the independent variables "pain duration before surgery," "preoperative NAHS," and "labrum lesion". Using ROC analysis, the optimal cutoff value of "pain duration before surgery" as a predictor was 9.5 months, for the NAHS 42.5 points. For the dependent variable, "6-month postoperative NAHS" significant correlations for the independent variables "age" and "pain duration before surgery" were revealed with a cutoff value of 55.5 years, respectively, 23.5 months.
CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded from the results that the date of surgery is relevant for the appearance of chondral defects. Patient age is a further relevant factor for clinical outcome. Recovery after hip arthroscopy takes place mainly in the first 6 weeks after surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level III.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chondral defects; Femoroacetabular impingement; Hip arthroscopy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25280948     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3332-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  32 in total

1.  Arthroscopic treatment of hip chondral defects: autologous chondrocyte transplantation versus simple debridement--a pilot study.

Authors:  Andrea Fontana; Alessandro Bistolfi; Maurizio Crova; Federica Rosso; Giuseppe Massazza
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 4.772

Review 2.  Endoscopic treatment of snapping hips, iliotibial band, and iliopsoas tendon.

Authors:  Victor M Ilizaliturri; Javier Camacho-Galindo
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Internal snapping hip syndrome: treatment by endoscopic release of the iliopsoas tendon.

Authors:  Victor M Ilizaliturri; Felix E Villalobos; Pedro A Chaidez; Fernando S Valero; Jose M Aguilera
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.772

4.  Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: early outcomes measures.

Authors:  Christopher M Larson; M Russell Giveans
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 4.772

5.  Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  J W Byrd; K S Jones
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  Timing in hip arthroscopy: does surgical timing change clinical results?

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Narlaka Jayasekera; Richard Villar
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-11       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score. An extension of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Authors:  Maria Klässbo; Eva Larsson; Eva Mannevik
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 8.  The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient.

Authors:  Asheesh Bedi; Neal Chen; William Robertson; Bryan T Kelly
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 4.772

9.  Microfracture for acetabular chondral defects in patients with femoroacetabular impingement: results at second-look arthroscopic surgery.

Authors:  Shanmugam Karthikeyan; Sally Roberts; Damian Griffin
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  A prospective randomized peri- and post-operative comparison of the minimally invasive anterolateral approach versus the lateral approach.

Authors:  Stefan Landgraeber; Henning Quitmann; Sebastian Güth; Marcel Haversath; Wojciech Kowalczyk; Andrés Kecskeméthy; Hansjörg Heep; Marcus Jäger
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2013-07-24
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  [Cartilage regeneration surgery on the hip : What is feasible?]

Authors:  Stefan Landgraeber; Marcus Jäger; Stefan Fickert
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Quality Assessment of Prospective Cohort Studies Evaluating Arthroscopic Treatment for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Axel Öhlin; Louise Karlsson; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Páll Jónasson; Mattias Ahldén; Adad Baranto; Olufemi R Ayeni; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-05-08

Review 3.  Predictors of Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Olawale A Sogbein; Ajay Shah; Jeffrey Kay; Muzammil Memon; Nicole Simunovic; Etienne L Belzile; Olufemi R Ayeni
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2019-06-19

4.  Femoroacetabular Impingement - Factors Associated with the Presence of Deep Injuries of the Chondrolabral Junction.

Authors:  Samuel Faccioni; Vinicius Adelchi Cachoeira; Gabriel Pozzobon Knop; Luiz Henrique Penteado Silva; Tercildo Knop
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2019-08-20

Review 5.  Evaluation of outcome reporting trends for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome- a systematic review.

Authors:  Ida Lindman; Sarantos Nikou; Axel Öhlin; Eric Hamrin Senorski; Olufemi Ayeni; Jon Karlsson; Mikael Sansone
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2021-04-23

Review 6.  The Natural History of Femoroacetabular Impingement.

Authors:  Benjamin D Kuhns; Alexander E Weber; David M Levy; Thomas H Wuerz
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2015-11-16

7.  Arthroscopic correction for concomitant cam impingement in a patient with idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A case report.

Authors:  Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Tadami Matsumoto
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2015-12-22

8.  Parameters affecting baseline hip function in patients with cam-derived femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: data analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.

Authors:  Sebastian Serong; Moritz Schutzbach; Stefan Fickert; Philipp Niemeyer; Christian Sobau; Gunther Spahn; Wolfgang Zinser; Stefan Landgraeber
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2021-08-04

9.  Outcome-Affecting Parameters of Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement with Concomitant Cartilage Damage-Data Analysis from the German Cartilage Registry.

Authors:  Sebastian Serong; Stefan Fickert; Philipp Niemeyer; Ingo J Banke; Jens Goronzy; Christian Sobau; Wolfgang Zinser; Stefan Landgraeber
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 4.241

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.