Literature DB >> 10976117

Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 2-year follow-up.

J W Byrd1, K S Jones.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Numerous indications, but little outcome data, have been reported for hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this prospective study is to report the 2-year results of hip arthroscopy performed on a consecutive series of patients for a variety of disorders. TYPE OF STUDY: Case series.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: There were 38 procedures performed on 35 patients who have achieved 2-year follow-up. All patients were assessed with a modified Harris hip score (pain and function) preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months or until a subsequent procedure was performed. Variables studied included age, sex, diagnosis, duration of symptoms, onset of symptoms, center-edge angle, Workers' Compensation, and pending litigation.
RESULTS: Follow-up was obtained on all patients. The median score improved from 57 to 85 points. This included 10 cases (9 patients) who underwent a subsequent procedure at an average of 10 months (6 total hip arthroplasty, 1 core decompression, 3 second arthroscopy) with an index score of 54 compared with 52 at the time of the second procedure. The median improvement for the following diagnoses was: loose body (34), labral lesion (27), synovitis (26), chondral injury (18), arthritis (14), and avascular necrosis (-11). Of the variables studied, the most statistically significant finding was that older men with longer duration of symptoms did worse. Two complications occurred in 1 patient: partial neuropraxia of the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and focal myositis ossificans along the anterior portal tract.
CONCLUSIONS: Hip arthroscopy can be performed for a variety of conditions (except end-stage avascular necrosis) with reasonable expectations of success and an acceptable complication rate. This is the first report to quantitate the results of hip arthroscopy for a heterogeneous population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10976117     DOI: 10.1053/jars.2000.7683

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  132 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular labrum and its tears.

Authors:  A A Narvani; E Tsiridis; C C Tai; P Thomas
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  [Hip arthroscopy - indications and limits].

Authors:  O Steimer; M Kusma; U Grün
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Hip arthroscopy: evolution, current practice and future developments.

Authors:  Emmet J Griffiths; Vikas Khanduja
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Surgical technique: Second-generation bone marrow stimulation via surgical dislocation to treat hip cartilage lesions.

Authors:  Michael Leunig; Lisa M Tibor; Florian D Naal; Reinhold Ganz; Matthias R Steinwachs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Arthroscopy of the hip joint: indication, technique, results.

Authors:  Oliver Rühmann
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Revision hip arthroscopic surgery: outcome at three years.

Authors:  Alessandro Aprato; Narlaka Jayasekera; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Reduced Hip Adduction Is Associated With Improved Function After Movement-Pattern Training in Young People With Chronic Hip Joint Pain.

Authors:  Marcie Harris-Hayes; Karen Steger-May; Linda R van Dillen; Mario Schootman; Gretchen B Salsich; Sylvia Czuppon; John C Clohisy; Paul K Commean; Travis J Hillen; Shirley A Sahrmann; Michael J Mueller
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-03-16       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Do professional athletes perform better than recreational athletes after arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement?

Authors:  Ajay Malviya; Christos P Paliobeis; Richard N Villar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Total hip arthroplasty in patients 50 years or less: do we improve activity profiles?

Authors:  Margaret Kuhn; Marcie Harris-Hayes; Karen Steger-May; Gail Pashos; John C Clohisy
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  Survey mode influence on patient-reported outcome scores in orthopaedic surgery: telephone results may be positively biased.

Authors:  Jon E Hammarstedt; John M Redmond; Asheesh Gupta; Kevin F Dunne; S Pavan Vemula; Benjamin G Domb
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.