Literature DB >> 25280396

Changes in bone mineral density and femoral neck narrowing in the proximal femur three to five years after hip resurfacing versus conventional total hip arthroplasty.

Davey M J M Gerhardt1, José M H Smolders1, Ton A J M Rijnders1, Annemiek Hol1, Job L C van Susante1.   

Abstract

We studied whether bone mineral density (BMD) is preserved without significant femoral neck narrowing (FNN) after hip resurfacing (RHA) (n=42) versus small diameter metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM THA) (n=40). In this three to five year randomized trial BMD was measured in the calcar with dual energy absorptiometry (DXA) preoperatively, at three and six months, one, two, three and five years postoperatively. Four additional BMD regions of interest (ROIs) and femoral neck narrowing (FNN) were measured after RHA. BMD in the calcar increased to 107% (P<0.001) at one year and remained stable. Additional ROIs in the femoral neck and trochanter-area BMD changes fluctuated between 99.9% and 104.1%. FNN was minimal with a mean of 1.3% at three years. After THA BMD decreased in the calcar to 80% at one year (P<0.001) and stabilized. This bone stock preserving nature of RHA must be weighed against potential disadvantages caused by specific metal-on-metal bearing problems.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone mineral density; femoral neck narrowing; hip resurfacing arthroplasty; metal-on-metal; randomized controlled trial; total hip arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25280396     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  5 in total

Review 1.  The effects of weight loss approaches on bone mineral density in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  S Soltani; G R Hunter; A Kazemi; S Shab-Bidar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Long-term results of Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty in Asian patients.

Authors:  Keisuke Uemura; Masaki Takao; Hidetoshi Hamada; Takashi Sakai; Kenji Ohzono; Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 1.731

3.  Current indications for hip resurfacing arthroplasty in 2016.

Authors:  Robert Sershon; Rishi Balkissoon; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-03

4.  Resurfacing hip arthroplasty better preserves a normal gait pattern at increasing walking speeds compared to total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Davey M J M Gerhardt; Thijs G Ter Mors; Gerjon Hannink; Job L C Van Susante
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  Gait after Birmingham Hip Resurfacing: an age-matched controlled prospective study.

Authors:  Anatole V Wiik; Rhiannon Lambkin; Justin P Cobb
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.082

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.