Literature DB >> 25278891

Predictive factors for acute proximal junctional failure after adult deformity surgery with upper instrumented vertebrae in the thoracolumbar spine.

Prokopis Annis1, Brandon D Lawrence1, William R Spiker1, Yue Zhang2, Wei Chen2, Michael D Daubs3, Darrel S Brodke1.   

Abstract

Study Type Retrospective cohort study. Introduction Acute proximal junctional failure (APJF) was recently defined by the International Spine Study Group as: postoperative fracture of the upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) or UIV + 1; UIV implant failure; proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) increase > 15 degrees; or need for proximal extension of the fusion within 6 months of surgery.1 The incidence and revision rates of APJF have been reported to be higher when the UIV is located in the lower thoracolumbar (TL) spine mostly because of high incidence of UIV or UIV + 1 fractures.2 Sagittal deformity overcorrection has been considered as a potential risk factor.34 Objective The purpose of this study is to assess independent predictive factors and timing for revisions of APJF in adult deformity patients with UIV in the TL (T9-L2) spine. Methods Retrospective review of 135 consecutive patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, treated at a single institution for adult spinal deformity, all with UIV in the TL spine (T9-L2). Fusions were divided into three cohorts based on the UIV location (T9-T10 vs. T11-T12 vs. L1-L2). Demographic data were reviewed and radiographic parameters were measured preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, at 6 months and at the final follow-up. Incidence and failure modes of APJF, as well as timing for APJF revision are reported. Risk factors for APJF were assessed with univariate and multivariate regression analysis models. Results A total of 135 consecutive patients were reviewed, with mean follow-up 42 months (24-126). Mean age was 66 years (24-86). There were no differences in the preoperative radiographic parameters between patients in any of the three cohorts with APJF. The incidence of APJF was 38.5%, with a trend toward higher APJF in the T9-T10 group (p = 0.07) (Table 1). When UIV was at T10, the incidence of APJF was 57.1%, significantly higher than the adjacent vertebrae, T9 and T11 (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, respectively). The overall revision rate for APJF was 17%, most often for UIV fracture, while PJK > 15 degrees alone had the highest 2 and 5 years survival (100%) (Fig. 1). Univariate analysis revealed preoperative sagittal vertical axis > 5 cm, postoperative PJA > 5 degrees and thoracic kyphosis > 30 degrees, and instrumentation to the pelvis as risk factors for APJF (Table 2). Multivariate regression analysis confirmed postoperative PJA > 5 degrees, and greater correction of lumbar lordosis (LL) as independent risk factors for APJF (Table 3). Conclusion The incidence of APJF in adult deformity patients is high if the UIV is in the lower thoracic or lumbar spine, with a trend toward higher rates when the UIV is at T10. Fracture at the UIV lead to the highest revision rate, while PJK > 15 degrees without fracture or hardware failure had the longest revision-free survival. Postoperative PJA > 5 degrees and greater correction of LL are independent risk factors for APJF.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278891      PMCID: PMC4174188          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1386755

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evid Based Spine Care J        ISSN: 1663-7976


Kaplan–Meier curve at 2 and 5 years. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Imm-post, immediately postoperative standing X-ray; LL, lumbar lordosis; OR, odds ratio; PJA, proximal junctional angle; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; ThK, thoracic kyphosis. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Post, immediately postoperative standing X-ray; LL, lumbar lordosis; OR, odds ratio; PJA, proximal junctional angle.
Table 1

Incidence and revision rates of APJFs in the three groups

All (135)T9–T10 (52)T11–T12 (45)L1–L2 (33)
APJFs52 (39%)25 (48%)14 (31%)13 (39%)
 UIV, UIV + 1 fracture32 (62%)19 (76%)8 (57%)5 (38%)
 PJK > 15 degrees11 (21%)3 (12%)3 (21%)5 (39%)
 UIV implant failure8 (15%)2 (8%)3 (21%)3 (23%)
 < 6 mo revision1 (2%)1 (4%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Revision APJF23 (44%)10 (40%)6 (43%)7 (54%)
 UIV, UIV + 1 fracture16 (70%)8 (80%)3 (50%)5 (71%)
 PJK > 15 degrees0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
 UIV implant failure6 (26%)1 (10%)3 (50%)2 (29%)
 < 6 mo revision1 (4%)1 (10%)0 (0%)0 (0%)
Overall revision APJF23/135 (17%)10/52 (19%)6/45 (13%)7/33 (21%)
Table 2

Univariate logistic on APJF with age adjustment

Variable namesOR (95% CI) p value
Pre-SVA > 52.46 (1.19, 5.1)0.015
Post-PJA > 536.63 (4.79,280)0.001
Imm-post ThK > 302.5 (1.11, 5.63)0.027
Instrumentation to pelvis2.19 (1.07, 4.48)0.032
LL change > 304.81 (1.9, 12.17)0.001

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Imm-post, immediately postoperative standing X-ray; LL, lumbar lordosis; OR, odds ratio; PJA, proximal junctional angle; SVA, sagittal vertical axis; ThK, thoracic kyphosis.

Table 3

Multivariate logistic regression on APJF

Variable namesOR (95% CI) p value
LL change > 30 degrees6.94 (1.67, 28.75)0.008
Post-PJA > 5 degrees27.77 (3.18, 242.47)0.002

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; Post, immediately postoperative standing X-ray; LL, lumbar lordosis; OR, odds ratio; PJA, proximal junctional angle.

  4 in total

1.  Is the T9, T11, or L1 the more reliable proximal level after adult lumbar or lumbosacral instrumented fusion to L5 or S1?

Authors:  Yongjung J Kim; Keith H Bridwell; Lawrence G Lenke; Seungchul Rhim; Young-Woo Kim
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; King B Akilah; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Mitsuru Yagi; Akilah B King; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Incidence, mode, and location of acute proximal junctional failures after surgical treatment of adult spinal deformity.

Authors:  Richard Hostin; Ian McCarthy; Michael OʼBrien; Shay Bess; Breton Line; Oheneba Boachie-Adjei; Doug Burton; Munish Gupta; Christopher Ames; Vedat Deviren; Khaled Kebaish; Christopher Shaffrey; Kirkham Wood; Robert Hart
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2013-05-20       Impact factor: 3.468

  4 in total
  13 in total

1.  Cervical sagittal deformity develops after PJK in adult thoracolumbar deformity correction: radiographic analysis utilizing a novel global sagittal angular parameter, the CTPA.

Authors:  Themistocles Protopsaltis; Nicolas Bronsard; Alex Soroceanu; Jensen K Henry; Renaud Lafage; Justin Smith; Eric Klineberg; Gregory Mundis; Han Jo Kim; Richard Hostin; Robert Hart; Christopher Shaffrey; Shay Bess; Christopher Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  The influence of spinal fusion length on proximal junction biomechanics: a parametric computational study.

Authors:  Dominika Ignasiak; Tobias Peteler; Tamás F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; Stephen J Ferguson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  An international consensus on the appropriate evaluation and treatment for adults with spinal deformity.

Authors:  Sigurd H Berven; Steven J Kamper; Niccole M Germscheid; Benny Dahl; Christopher I Shaffrey; Lawrence G Lenke; Stephen J Lewis; Kenneth M Cheung; Ahmet Alanay; Manabu Ito; David W Polly; Yong Qiu; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Degenerative lumbar scoliosis patients with proximal junctional kyphosis have lower muscularity, fatty degeneration at the lumbar area.

Authors:  Lei Yuan; Yan Zeng; Zhongqiang Chen; Weishi Li; Xinling Zhang; Shuo Mai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  Proximal Junctional Kyphosis and Proximal Junctional Failure Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Hyun; Byoung Hun Lee; Jong-Hwa Park; Ki-Jeong Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng; Hyun-Jib Kim
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2017-12-31

6.  Reduction of intradiscal pressure by the use of polycarbonate-urethane rods as compared to titanium rods in posterior thoracolumbar spinal fixation.

Authors:  Eva Jacobs; Alex K Roth; Jacobus J Arts; Lodewijk W van Rhijn; Paul C Willems
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  The Relationship between Sacral Kyphosis and Pelvic Incidence.

Authors:  George McKay; Peter Alexander Torrie; Georgina Dempster; Wendy Bertram; Ian Harding
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-02-07

8.  Negative Sagittal Balance Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery.

Authors:  Robert K Merrill; Jun S Kim; Ian T McNeill; Samuel C Overley; James E Dowdell; John M Caridi; Samuel K Cho
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-05-16

9.  Role of Posterior Ligamentous Reinforcement in Proximal Junctional Kyphosis: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.

Authors:  Jun Sup Kim; Zoe Beatrice Cheung; Varun Arvind; John Caridi; Samuel Kang-Wook Cho
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2018-10-18

10.  Is Sacral Extension a Risk Factor for Early Proximal Junctional Kyphosis in Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery?

Authors:  Sebastian Decker; Renaud Lafage; Christian Krettek; Robert Hart; Christopher Ames; Justin S Smith; Douglas Burton; Eric Klineberg; Shay Bess; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.