Literature DB >> 25278628

Establishment of the Certification System "Gynaecological Dysplasia" in Germany.

M W Beckmann1, J Quaas2, A Bischofberger3, A Kämmerle3, M P Lux1, S Wesselmann4.   

Abstract

Gynaecological cancer centres have been established nationwide in Germany since 2008 according to the certification system of the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft e. V. [DKG]) and the German Society for Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe e. V. [DGGG]). However, patient access to the certified gynaecological cancer centres is currently only possible through direct referrals. A longitudinal structure with the corresponding long-term documentation of both the high-grade precursors as well as the cancers does not exist as yet. According to the aims of the National Cancer Plan, a corresponding structure for the cancer entity "cervix carcinoma" should be established. The foundations for such a structure are appropriate diagnostic units that are responsible, after nationwide screening, for clarification according to guideline-conform principles. On the basis of the vote of the certification commission for gynaecological cancer centres under the chairmanship of the DKG, the Working Group for Gynaecological Oncology (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie e. V. [AGO]), the Committee on Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Zervixpathologie & Kolposkopie [AG-CPC]) and the DGGG the certification system for gynaecological dysplasia has been established. As a general principle, a distinction is made between the certification of a consulting practice for gynaecological dysplasia and a gynaecological dysplasia facility in order to integrate both outpatient and inpatient health-care facilities into the certification system. In analogy to the further catalogue of requirements from the DKG, quantitative and qualitative minimum numbers are demanded. Furthermore, the requirements of the certification process include a summary of patient information, the applied guidelines, continuing and further training, interdisciplinary cooperation in tumour boards, contents or, respectively, procedure descriptions for consulting practices and the trial participations. Central components of the questionnaire are quality indicators that can be used as specific and measurable elements to evaluate the quality of treatment. After successful pilot certification, finalisation of the updated version of the questionnaire and a completed specialist auditor training course for the certification of gynaecological dysplasia, it will be possible to establish a nationwide treatment system for dysplasia within certified structures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  certification; dysplasia; gynaecological cancer centres; gynaecological dysplasia units; national cancer plan; screening

Year:  2014        PMID: 25278628      PMCID: PMC4175128          DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1383042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd        ISSN: 0016-5751            Impact factor:   2.915


  3 in total

1.  Defining and classifying clinical indicators for quality improvement.

Authors:  Jan Mainz
Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.038

Review 2.  The concept of the certification system of the German Cancer Society and its impact on gynecological cancer care.

Authors:  Simone Wesselmann; M W Beckmann; A Winter
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.344

3.  [Participation in cancer screening in Germany: results of the German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults (DEGS1)].

Authors:  A Starker; A-C Saß
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.513

  3 in total
  4 in total

1.  Development and Validation of a Standardized Questionnaire and Standardized Diary for Use in Integrative Medicine Consultations in Gynecologic Oncology.

Authors:  C C Hack; N B M Hüttner; P A Fasching; M W Beckmann
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 2.915

2.  Colposcopy non-attendance following an abnormal cervical cancer screening result: a prospective population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Linda A Liang; Sylke R Zeissig; Gunther Schauberger; Sophie Merzweiler; Kathrin Radde; Sabine Fischbeck; Hans Ikenberg; Maria Blettner; Stefanie J Klug
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Aftercare of Cervical Carcinoma.

Authors:  Matthias W Beckmann; Frederik A Stuebs; Dirk Vordermark; Martin Christoph Koch; Lars-Christian Horn; Tanja Fehm
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 8.251

4.  Cytology and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test for Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment.

Authors:  Frederik A Stuebs; Martin C Koch; Anna K Dietl; Werner Adler; Carol Geppert; Arndt Hartmann; Antje Knöll; Matthias W Beckmann; Grit Mehlhorn; Carla E Schulmeyer; Paul Gass
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.