Literature DB >> 34755595

The Diagnosis, Treatment, and Aftercare of Cervical Carcinoma.

Matthias W Beckmann1, Frederik A Stuebs, Dirk Vordermark, Martin Christoph Koch, Lars-Christian Horn, Tanja Fehm.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Approximately 4380 cases of cervical carcinoma were diagnosed in Germany in 2016. In women who had not participated in early detection programs, cervical carcinoma was usually already in an advanced stage at the time of diagnosis. Certified structures for care in conformity with the existing guidelines are available.
METHODS: The new German clinical practice guideline was revised with the participation of 50 medical societies under the expert guidance of the Guideline Program in Oncology, which includes the German Association of the Scientific Medical Societies (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, AWMF). A systematic literature review was conducted. Systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were considered.
RESULTS: The histologic tumor stage and lymph-node stage are essential determinants of the treatment strategy. The main innovation regarding surgical treatment is the revival of open hysterectomy (overall survival [minimally invasive vs open hysterectomy]: 94.04% vs 99.4%; hazard ratio [HR]: 6.00; 95% confidence interval [1.77; 20.30]). In addition, for tumors measuring 2 cm or less, sentinel node biopsy is recommended rather than radical pelvic lymphadenectomy. MRI-guided brachytherapy is an oblig atory component of radiochemotherapy (overall survival [radiochemotherapy with vs without brachytherapy]: 58.2% vs 46.2%, p<0.001). The standard palliative treatment consists of bevacizumab combined with a platinum-containing agent (overall survival: HR: 0.77 [0.62; 0.95]; p = 0.007).
CONCLUSION: Despite the introduction of new treatments, the outcome of patients with advanced cervical carcinoma has not much improved. In the surgical treatment of cervical carcinoma, the open approach is now favored. The sentinel node biopsy technique has become well established for the surgical staging of small tumors. Controlled trials are needed so that the outcome of women with cervical carcinoma, particularly in its advanced and metastatic stages, can be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34755595      PMCID: PMC8884069          DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2021.0352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int        ISSN: 1866-0452            Impact factor:   8.251


  37 in total

1.  Added value of para-aortic surgical staging compared to 18F-FDG PET/CT on the external beam radiation field for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: An ONCO-GF study.

Authors:  Marjolein De Cuypere; Pierre Lovinfosse; Frédéric Goffin; Christine Gennigens; Ramon Rovira; Joan Duch; Maxime Fastrez; Géraldine Gebhart; Jean Luc Squifflet; Mathieu Luyckx; Gabriel Charaf; Kurt Crener; Frédéric Buxant; Dario Bucella; Mathieu Jouret; Roland Hustinx; Frédéric Kridelka
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 4.424

2.  Obstetric Outcomes in Women With Early Bulky Cervical Cancer Downstaged by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy to Allow for Fertility-Sparing Surgery: A Meta-analysis and Metaregression.

Authors:  Alexandros Laios; Jenneke Kasius; Anastasios Tranoulis; Alexandros Gryparis; Thomas Ind
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 3.437

3.  Tumour and pelvic lymph node metabolic activity on FDG-PET/CT to stratify patients for para-aortic surgical staging in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Authors:  A Martinez; M Voglimacci; A Lusque; A Ducassou; L Gladieff; N Dupuis; M A Angeles; C Martinez; Y Tanguy Le Gac; E Chantalat; A Hitzel; F Courbon; G Ferron; E Gabiache
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prospective multicenter study evaluating the survival of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic para-aortic lymphadenectomy before chemoradiotherapy in the era of positron emission tomography imaging.

Authors:  Sebastien Gouy; Philippe Morice; Fabrice Narducci; Catherine Uzan; Alejandra Martinez; Annie Rey; Enrica Bentivegna; Patricia Pautier; Desiree Deandreis; Denis Querleu; Christine Haie-Meder; Eric Leblanc
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Multicenter validation study of the sentinel lymph node concept in cervical cancer: AGO Study Group.

Authors:  Christopher Altgassen; Hermann Hertel; Antje Brandstädt; Christhardt Köhler; Matthias Dürst; Achim Schneider
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Clinicopathological Aspects of Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: a Multicenter Retrospective Study and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Fan Xu; Jing Ma; Hongyan Yi; Huiquan Hu; Liangsheng Fan; Peng Wu; Xiaojing Chen; Xiangguang Wu; Lan Yu; Hui Xing; Wei Wang
Journal:  Cell Physiol Biochem       Date:  2018-10-24

Review 7.  The sentinel node procedure in early stage cervical cancer, taking the next step; a diagnostic review.

Authors:  Casper Tax; Maroeska M Rovers; Corine de Graaf; Petra L M Zusterzeel; Ruud L M Bekkers
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for cervical cancer: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yun-Hua Peng; Xin-Xiu Wang; Jing-Song Zhu; Li Gao
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.730

9.  Phase III randomised controlled trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery vs radical surgery alone for stages IB2, IIA2, and IIB cervical cancer: a Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial (JCOG 0102).

Authors:  N Katsumata; H Yoshikawa; H Kobayashi; T Saito; K Kuzuya; T Nakanishi; T Yasugi; N Yaegashi; H Yokota; S Kodama; T Mizunoe; M Hiura; T Kasamatsu; T Shibata; T Kamura
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.