Literature DB >> 25277482

Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease.

Jeong Min Eom1, Kye Hyun Kim, Jin-Sung Yuk, Sung Il Roh, Jung Hun Lee.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of current study was to determine whether single-port laparoscopic surgery (SP-LS) improves the health-related quality of life (QoL) compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery (conventional LS) in women with benign gynecologic disease.
METHODS: We performed a prospective case-control study from October 2010 to December 2012. A total of 273 women with benign gynecologic disease participated in this study, and 135 of them were in the SP-LS group and 138 in the conventional LS. We evaluated QoL after SP-LS or conventional LS. All patients were asked to complete short-form 36 (SF-36) QoL health surveys preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Clinical characteristics and operative outcomes showed no significant differences between both groups. SP-LS had no benefits in QoL compared with conventional LS in the main categories, even though SP-LS showed statistically significant higher scores than conventional LS for the role of physical domain at 1 month postoperatively and for social function at 3 months postoperatively. In contrast to this, conventional LS had statistically significant higher scores than SP-LS for role function, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and emotional well-being at 6 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS: With a 6-month follow-up, SP-LS does not offer a QoL benefit over conventional LS in women with benign gynecologic disease. However, a larger prospective randomized study would be required to confirm this.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25277482     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3875-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  20 in total

1.  Single-port laparoscopic surgery is applicable to most gynecologic surgery: a single surgeon's experience.

Authors:  Maria Lee; Sang Wun Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Ga Won Yim; Sunghoon Kim; Young Tae Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Learning curve and surgical outcome for single-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy in 100 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Jiheum Paek; Sang-Wun Kim; San-Hui Lee; Maria Lee; Ga-Won Yim; Eun-Ji Nam; Young-Tae Kim
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Randomized controlled trial comparing single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy and four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Ma; Maria A Cassera; Georg O Spaun; Chet W Hammill; Paul D Hansen; Shaghayegh Aliabadi-Wahle
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Quality-of-life measures after single-access versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Mohamed E Abd Ellatif; Waleed A Askar; Ashraf E Abbas; Nashat Noaman; Ahmed Negm; Gamal El-Morsy; Ayman El Nakeeb; Alaa Magdy; Mahmoud Amin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; W Rogers; A E Raczek; J F Lu
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Single-port laparoscopic myomectomy using transumbilical GelPort access.

Authors:  Jung Hun Lee; Joong Sub Choi; Seung Wook Jeon; Chang Eop Son; Se Jin Lee; Yong Seung Lee
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  A prospective comparison of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy using transumbilical GelPort access and multiport laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Jung Hun Lee; Joong Sub Choi; Seung Wook Jeon; Chang Eop Son; Jin Hwa Hong; Jong Woon Bae
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Evaluation of index and profile measures of health status in a randomized controlled trial. Comparison of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, EuroQol, and disease specific measures.

Authors:  C Jenkinson; A Gray; H Doll; K Lawrence; S Keoghane; R Layte
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.

Authors:  C A McHorney; J E Ware; A E Raczek
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.983

10.  A comparative cross-sectional study on cosmetic outcomes after single port or conventional laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Jeong Min Eom; Jung Hwa Ko; Joong Sub Choi; Jin Hwa Hong; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.435

View more
  2 in total

1.  Do preoperative depressive symptoms predict quality of life after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A longitudinal prospective study.

Authors:  Hao-Hsien Lee; Chong-Chi Chiu; King-Teh Lee; Jhi-Joung Wang; Jin-Jia Lin; Chien-Ming Chao; Hon-Yi Shi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Feasibility of reduced port surgery applying Higuchi's transverse incision.

Authors:  Kazu Ueda; Yoko Nagayoshi; Ayako Kawabata; Takafumi Kuroda; Yasushi Iida; Motoaki Saitou; Nozomu Yanaihara; Kouhei Sugimoto; Masaru Sakamoto; Aikou Okamoto
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2016-06-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.