Literature DB >> 21641107

A prospective comparison of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy using transumbilical GelPort access and multiport laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy.

Jung Hun Lee1, Joong Sub Choi, Seung Wook Jeon, Chang Eop Son, Jin Hwa Hong, Jong Woon Bae.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of single-port laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (SP-LAVH) using transumbilical GelPort access. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective case-control study was performed at a University teaching hospital between January 2009 and March 2010, a total of 242 women with a uterus ≤16 weeks gestational size were enrolled in the study. Eighty women underwent SP-LAVH using transumbilical GelPort access (SP-LAVH group), and 162 women underwent conventional multiport LAVH (conventional LAVH group).
RESULTS: There were no statistical differences between groups in the patients' demographic characteristics, median operating time (92.5 vs. 90 min; P=0.479), postoperative changes in hemoglobin concentration (1.4 vs. 1.4 g/dL; P=0.290), weight of the resected uterus (246 vs. 256 g; P=0.098), return of bowel activity (37.1 vs. 39.8h; P=0.103), hospital stay (3 vs. 3 days; P=0.554), complication rate (3.8 vs. 4.3%; P=1.000), and the rate of using an additional trocar or conversion to laparotomy (1.3 vs. 0.6%; P=0.553).
CONCLUSIONS: SP-LAVH using transumbilical GelPort access is feasible and safe in women with a uterus ≤ 16 weeks gestational size. However, a large prospective randomized study is needed to confirm this conclusion and to establish guidelines for the use of SP-LAVH.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21641107     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol        ISSN: 0301-2115            Impact factor:   2.435


  6 in total

1.  Quality of life after single-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecologic disease.

Authors:  Jeong Min Eom; Kye Hyun Kim; Jin-Sung Yuk; Sung Il Roh; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for benign or pre-invasive uterine disease.

Authors:  Jeong-Yeol Park; Juhee Nho; In-Ji Cho; Yuran Park; Dae-Yeon Kim; Dae-Shik Suh; Jong-Hyeok Kim; Joo-Hyun Nam
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-09       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  An analysis of the surgical outcomes of laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy and multi-port laparoscopic myomectomy.

Authors:  Shi-Fang Zhou; Hai-Yan Wang; Kun Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-06

4.  Single-port access versus conventional multi-port access total laparoscopic hysterectomy for very large uterus.

Authors:  Jinhwa Lee; Sunghoon Kim; Eun Ji Nam; Sun Mi Hwang; Young Tae Kim; Sang Wun Kim
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2015-05-19

Review 5.  Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopy for hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Evelien M Sandberg; Claire F la Chapelle; Marjolein M van den Tweel; Jan W Schoones; Frank Willem Jansen
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.344

6.  Single-port laparoscopic neosalpingostomy for hydrosalpinx.

Authors:  Jin-Sung Yuk; Kye Hyun Kim; Ji Kwon Park; Jung Hun Lee
Journal:  Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther       Date:  2017-04-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.