Literature DB >> 25276613

Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes.

Dee Dee Wang1, Amit Tibrewala1, Phuc Nguygen1, Tanmay Swadia1, Gordon Jacobsen1, Arfaat Khan1, Karthik Ananthasubramaniam1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conflicting evidence remains regarding the value of fragmented QRS (fQRS) on surface electrocardiogram (EKG). We present the 5-year outcome of patients with fQRS on EKG and its correlation to SPECT and coronary angiography (CA).
METHODS: We retrospectively studied EKG's in 248 consecutive patients undergoing SPECT and CA with known or suspected coronary artery disease (CAD). The presence of fQRS or Q waves in two contiguous EKG leads was correlated with major coronary artery distributions on SPECT and cath. Patients with bundle-branch block, paced-rhythm or absence of EKG within one month of SPECT were excluded. The final EKG data for 238 patients were analyzed and compared with myocardial scar on SPECT and the presence of significant (>50%) coronary stenosis on CA. Predictors of MACE (death, MI, heart failure) were evaluated. Freedom from all-cause mortality was assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
RESULTS: Of 238 patients, no significant difference was noted in the presence of scar on SPECT in fQRS (3/77; 3.8%) versus no fQRS (11/161; 6.8%) (P=0.56); or CA based CAD (55/77; 71% fQRS) and no fQRS (99/161, 61.4%) (P=0.20). EKG Q wave presence was similar in both groups: (12/77; 15.5% fQRS), (17/161; 10.5% no fQRS) (P=0.3). Patients with CA based significant LAD disease were 3.680 times more likely to have fQRS (P=0.04), however, fQRS was not significantly associated with MACE (P=0.92) or all-cause mortality (P=0.93).
CONCLUSIONS: This study does not support routine assessment of fQRS on surface EKG as a reliable predictor of SPECT myocardial scar, MACE or all-cause mortality over a long period of follow-up.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragmented QRS (fQRS); coronary angiography (CA); single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)

Year:  2014        PMID: 25276613      PMCID: PMC4147086          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2223-3652.2014.08.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther        ISSN: 2223-3652


  24 in total

Review 1.  Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart. A statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Manuel D Cerqueira; Neil J Weissman; Vasken Dilsizian; Alice K Jacobs; Sanjiv Kaul; Warren K Laskey; Dudley J Pennell; John A Rumberger; Thomas Ryan; Mario S Verani
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-29       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Fragmented left sided QRS in absence of bundle branch block: sign of left ventricular aneurysm.

Authors:  Chatla V R Reddy; Kuruvilla Cheriparambill; Barry Saul; Majesh Makan; John Kassotis; Awaneesh Kumar; Mithilesh Kumar Das
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

3.  Fragmented QRS complex has poor sensitivity in detecting myocardial scar.

Authors:  Dee Dee Wang; Daniel M Buerkel; James R Corbett; Hitinder S Gurm
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.468

4.  Prognostic significance of fragmented QRS in patients with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results of a 1-year, single-center follow-up.

Authors:  R Guo; J Zhang; Y Li; Y Xu; K Tang; W Li
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 1.443

5.  Fragmented QRS as a predictor of arrhythmic events in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Francisco Femenía; Maurico Arce; Jorge Van Grieken; Emilce Trucco; Luis Mont; Mauricio Abello; José L Merino; Máximo Rivero-Ayerza; Bulent Gorenek; Carlos Rodriguez; Wilma M Hopman; Adrian Baranchuk
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Incremental prognostic value of myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography for the prediction of cardiac death: differential stratification for risk of cardiac death and myocardial infarction.

Authors:  R Hachamovitch; D S Berman; L J Shaw; H Kiat; I Cohen; J A Cabico; J Friedman; G A Diamond
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-02-17       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Relationship between fragmented QRS and no-reflow, infarct size, and peri-infarct zone assessed using cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Luc Lorgis; Alexandre Cochet; Olivier Chevallier; Marion Angue; Aurelie Gudjoncik; Alain Lalande; Marianne Zeller; Philippe Buffet; François Brunotte; Yves Cottin
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Comparison of fragmented QRS and myocardial perfusion-gated SPECT findings.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir; Yusuf Ziya Tan; Yücel Colkesen; Ahmet Temiz; Fatmanur Turker; Semra Akgoz
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.690

9.  Q-wave prediction of myocardial infarct location, size and transmural extent at magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Daniele Rovai; Gianluca Di Bella; Giuseppe Rossi; Massimo Lombardi; Giovanni D Aquaro; Antonio L'Abbate; Alessandro Pingitore
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.439

10.  One-year outcome of patients after acute coronary syndromes (from the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndromes Registry).

Authors:  Andrew T Yan; Mary Tan; David Fitchett; Chi-Ming Chow; Ronald A Fowlis; Thomas G McAvinue; Matthew T Roe; Eric D Peterson; Jack V Tu; Anatoly Langer; Shaun G Goodman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  6 in total

1.  Erratum to Fragmented QRS on surface electrocardiogram is not a reliable predictor of myocardial scar, angiographic coronary disease or long term adverse outcomes.

Authors: 
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-10

2.  Prognostic value of fragmented QRS complex in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Dehghani; Akram Shariati; Azin Haghjou; Samin Izadi; Babak Sattartabar; Yousef Rezaei
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 1.443

3.  Short-term Prognosis of Fragmented QRS Complex in Patients with Non-ST Elevated Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Min Li; Xiao Wang; Shu-Hua Mi; Zhe Chi; Qing Chen; Xin Zhao; Shao-Ping Nie
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.628

4.  QRS Fragmentation Patterns Representing Myocardial Scar Need to Be Separated from Benign Normal Variants: Hypotheses and Proposal for Morphology based Classification.

Authors:  M Anette E Haukilahti; Antti Eranti; Tuomas Kenttä; Heikki V Huikuri
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  Fragmented QRS in prediction of ischemic heart disease diagnosed by stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Pimpimol Yooprasert; Prin Vathesatogkit; Varinsawat Thirawuth; Watcharee Prasertkulchai; Tarinee Tangcharoen
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  The Difference on Features of Fragmented QRS Complex and Influences on Mortality in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  Di Liang; Jingyi Zhang; Li Lin; Wenxia Zong
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 2.672

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.