| Literature DB >> 25276151 |
Dejan Vukajlovic1, Goran Milasinovic2, Lazar Angelkov1, Velibor Ristic1, Milosav Tomovic1, Ruzica Jurcevic1, Petar Otasevic1.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: In this study, we sought to determine whether myocardial contractile reserve (CR) assessed by dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) can identify patients who experience nearly complete normalization of left ventricular (LV) function after the implantation of a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) pacemaker.Entities:
Keywords: cardiac resynchronization therapy; contractile reserve; dobutamine stress echocardiography; super-response
Year: 2014 PMID: 25276151 PMCID: PMC4175763 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2014.40790
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics
| Parameter | All patients | Super-responders ( | Non-super-responders ( | Value of |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 59.3 ±10.4 | 60.9 ±10.2 | 59.1 ±10.5 | 0.68 |
| Female gender | 9 (16.4%) | 2 (28.6%) | 7 (14.6%) | 0.32 |
| NYHA class | 3.0 ±0.5 | 2.6 ±0.2 | 3.1 ±0.5 | 0.04 |
| LBBB | 51 (92.7%) | 7 (100%) | 44 (91.6%) | 0.42 |
| AF | 9 (16.4%) | 0 (0%) | 9 (18.8%) | 0.21 |
| QRS duration [ms] | 173.7 ±17.9 | 192.3 ±20.1 | 171.0 ±16.04 | 0.03 |
| 6MWT [m] | 317.5 ±49.4 | 369.4 ±22.0 | 309.7 ±47.7 | < 0.01 |
| LVEDD [mm] | 69.8 ±8.9 | 62.7 ±2.4 | 70.8 ±9.0 | 0.02 |
| LVESD [mm] | 53.7 ±11.6 | 42.9 ±4.3 | 55.2 ±11.5 | < 0.01 |
| LVEF [%] | 16.9 ±7.3 | 19.4 ±5.4 | 16.5 ±7.5 | 0.33 |
| RVEDD | 23.7 ±6.5 | 25.1 ±0.9 | 23.5 ±6.9 | 0.54 |
| MR | 1.5 ±1.3 | 0.6 ±0.8 | 1.7 ±1.3 | 0.03 |
| ΔWMSI | 0.57 ±0.39 | 1.031 ±0.120 | 0.49 ±0.371 | < 0.01 |
| ΔEF | 9.95 ±6.541 | 17.857 ±2.1931 | 8.792 ±6.152 | < 0.01 |
LBBB – left bundle branch block, AF – atrial fibrillation, 6MWT – 6-minute walking test, LVEDD – left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, LVESD – left ventricular end-systolic dimension, LVEF – left ventricular ejection fraction, RVEDD – right ventricular end-diastolic dimension, MR – mitral regurgitation, ∆WMSI – wall motion score index change during the dobutamine test, ∆EF – ejection fraction change during the dobutamine test
p value corresponds to relation between super-responders and non-super-responders
Figure 1Kaplan-Maier curves showing the survival free of rehospitalization for worsening of heart failure, according to the super-response to the resynchronization therapy
Figure 2Receiver operating characteristic curve for wall motion score index change (A) and ejection fraction change during dobutamine test (B)
AUC – area under curve
Figure 3Kaplan-Maier curves showing the survival free of rehospitalization for worsening of heart failure, according to the dobutamine-induced change in left ventricular ejection fraction
Figure 4Kaplan-Maier curves showing the survival free of rehospitalization for worsening of heart failure, according to the dobutamine-induced change in wall motion score index