Literature DB >> 20382271

Characterization of super-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

John Rickard1, Dharam J Kumbhani, Zoran Popovic, David Verhaert, Mahesh Manne, Daniel Sraow, Bryan Baranowski, David O Martin, Bruce D Lindsay, Richard A Grimm, Bruce L Wilkoff, Patrick Tchou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic systolic heart failure who undergo cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), improvements in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and reductions in left ventricular volume are generally modest. A minority of patients experience a dramatic response to CRT (super-responders), but the attributes associated with these patients have not been fully characterized.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify baseline clinical attributes of super-responders and to assess the survival benefit associated with this response.
METHODS: We reviewed clinical, echocardiographic, and ECG data from a cohort of 233 patients undergoing new implantation of a CRT device between December 2001 and November 2006. All patients had a baseline LVEF < or =40% and New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms on standard medical therapy. Patients whose absolute LVEF improved by > or =20% were termed super-responders. A multivariate model was constructed to determine factors predictive of super-response, and an assessment of mortality was made.
RESULTS: In this cohort of 233 patients, 32 (13.7%) met criteria for super-response. In univariate analysis, super-responders were more likely to be female and have a native left bundle branch block, lower preimplant brain natriuretic peptide and red cell distribution width levels, and smaller baseline left ventricular volumes with trends toward having more nonischemic cardiomyopathy and midventricular lead positions. In multivariate analysis, only left bundle branch block remained significantly associated with super-response. Super-responders had a considerably lower incidence of mortality compared to non-super-responders (9.4% vs 43.2%, P = .006) at mean follow-up of 5.5 +/- 1.2 years.
CONCLUSION: Baseline left bundle branch block is strongly associated with super-response to CRT. Super-responders derive better long-term outcomes with CRT than do non-super-responders. Copyright 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20382271     DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2010.04.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart Rhythm        ISSN: 1547-5271            Impact factor:   6.343


  28 in total

1.  Increasing knowledge and changing views in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Laszlo Buga; John G F Cleland
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.214

2.  Periprocedural management of cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  John Rickard; Niraj Varma
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2014-04

Review 3.  Current role of echocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Donato Mele; Matteo Bertini; Michele Malagù; Marianna Nardozza; Roberto Ferrari
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

4.  Manifest cardiac memory after biventricular pacing in a super-responder patient: Is memory the sign of a 'forgotten' electrical ventricular pattern?

Authors:  Andrea Di Cori; Giulio Zucchelli; Ezio Soldati; Maria Grazia Bongiorni
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2011-08-27

5.  Outcome of super-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy defined by endpoint-derived parameters of left ventricular remodeling: a two-center retrospective study.

Authors:  David Hürlimann; Susann Schmidt; Burkhardt Seifert; Ardan M Saguner; Gerhard Hindricks; Thomas F Lüscher; Frank Ruschitzka; Jan Steffel
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Optimizing Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: an Update on New Insights and Advancements.

Authors:  Adam Grimaldi; Eiran Z Gorodeski; John Rickard
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2018-06

7.  Response to cardiac resynchronization therapy in non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is unrelated to medical therapy.

Authors:  Gregory Sinner; Hesham R Omar; You W Lin; Samy C Elayi; Maya E Guglin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Current concepts in pacing 2010-2011: the right and wrong way to pace.

Authors:  Simon Modi; Andrew Krahn; Raymond Yee
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2011-10

9.  Not left ventricular lead position, but the extent of immediate asynchrony reduction predicts long-term response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Wolfram C Poller; Henryk Dreger; Marius Schwerg; Hansjürgen Bondke; Christoph Melzer
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 5.460

10.  Three-dimensional electroanatomic mapping of the coronary veins during cardiac resynchronization therapy implant: feasibility and possible applications.

Authors:  Imran Niazi; Kyungmoo Ryu; Richard Hood; Indrajit Choudhuri; Masood Akhtar
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.