Literature DB >> 17317367

Effect of total scar burden on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging on response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Claudia Ypenburg1, Stijntje D Roes, Gabe B Bleeker, Theodorus A M Kaandorp, Albert de Roos, Martin J Schalij, Ernst E van der Wall, Jeroen J Bax.   

Abstract

It was shown that improvement in left ventricular (LV) function and reverse remodeling after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) were greater in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy than in those with ischemic cardiomyopathy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of scar burden on response to CRT. We included 34 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (New York Heart Association class 3.1 +/- 0.4, LV ejection fraction 23 +/- 7%). Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging was used to determine total scar burden, using a 17-segment model with a 5-point hyperenhancement scale (from score 0 = no hyperenhancement, indicating no scar, to score 4 = hyperenhancement >76%, transmural scar). Linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation (r = -0.91, p <0.05) between total scar burden at baseline and change in LV end-systolic volume after 6 months of CRT. Also, patients not responding to CRT had significantly more scar tissue than responders. A scar burden >1.20 resulted in complete functional nonresponse. In conclusion, total scar burden, assessed using contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, is an important factor influencing response to CRT and may be included in the selection process for CRT candidates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17317367     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.09.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  79 in total

Review 1.  Left ventricular endocardial pacing and multisite pacing to improve CRT response.

Authors:  Sylvain Ploux; Zachary Whinnett; Pierre Bordachar
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Reduced septal glucose metabolism predicts response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  David Birnie; Rob A de Kemp; Anthony S Tang; Terence D Ruddy; Michael H Gollob; Ann Guo; Kathryn Williams; Kerry Thomson; Jean N DaSilva; Rob S Beanlands
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-12-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Multimodality imaging in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Bas L van der Hoeven; Martin J Schalij; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 4.  Lead positioning strategies to enhance response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Dan Blendea; Jagmeet P Singh
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

5.  Impact of scar burden by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging on patient outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Evan C Adelstein; Hidekazu Tanaka; Prem Soman; Glen Miske; Stephanie C Haberman; Samir F Saba; John Gorcsan
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2010-10-22       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Signal intensity enhances diagnostic capacity in myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A van der Laarse; E E van der Wall
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 2.357

7.  High-amplitude left ventricular pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: an alternative way to increase response rate in non-responders.

Authors:  Halit Zengin; Filiz Akın; Sabri Demircan; Korhan Soylu; Alirıza Erbay; Serkan Yuksel; Murat Meric; Okan Gulel; Mahmut Sahin; Ozcan Yılmaz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 8.  Role of cardiac MRI and nuclear imaging in cardiac resynchronization therapy.

Authors:  Niti R Aggarwal; Matthew W Martinez; Bernard J Gersh; Panithaya Chareonthaitawee
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: the issue of non-response.

Authors:  Luigi Padeletti; Alessandro Paoletti Perini; Edoardo Gronda
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 4.214

10.  Lack of clinical predictors of optimal V-V delay in patients with cardiac resynchronization devices.

Authors:  Avi Fischer; Riple Hansalia; Samantha Buckley; Robin Goldberg; Martin Goldman; Paul Muntner; Davendra Mehta; W Lane Duvall
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2009-01-16       Impact factor: 1.900

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.