Literature DB >> 28297002

Use of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems to Prevent Venous Thromboembolism in Surgical Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Zachary M Borab1, Michael A Lanni2, Michael G Tecce2, Christopher J Pannucci3, John P Fischer2.   

Abstract

Importance: Health care professionals do not adequately stratify risk or provide prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) among surgical patients. Computerized clinical decision support systems (CCDSSs) have been implemented to assist clinicians and improve prophylaxis for VTE. Objective: To evaluate the effect of implementing CCDSSs on the ordering of VTE prophylaxis and the rates of VTE. Data Sources: PubMed, MEDLINE via OVID, EMBASE via OVID, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, and clinicaltrials.gov were searched in June 2016 for articles published in English from October 15, 1991, to February 16, 2016. A manual search of references from relevant articles was also performed. Study Selection: Clinical trials and observational studies among surgical patients comparing CCDSSs with VTE risk stratification and assistance in ordering prophylaxis vs routine care without decision support were included. Of the 188 articles screened, 11 (5.9%) were eligible for meta-analysis. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality independently. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of prophylaxis for VTE and VTE events. Random- and fixed-effects models were used to summarize odds ratios and risk ratios.
Results: Eleven articles (9 prospective cohort trials and 2 retrospective cohort trials) comprising 156 366 individuals (104 241 in the intervention group and 52 125 in the control group) were included. The use of CCDSSs was associated with a significant increase in the rate of appropriate ordering of prophylaxis for VTE (odds ratio, 2.35; 95% CI, 1.78-3.10; P < .001) and a significant decrease in the risk of VTE events (risk ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Use of CCDSSs increases the proportion of surgical patients who were prescribed adequate prophylaxis for VTE and correlates with a reduction in VTE events.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28297002      PMCID: PMC5831455          DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2017.0131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  43 in total

1.  Surveillance bias in outcomes reporting.

Authors:  Elliott R Haut; Peter J Pronovost
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Effectiveness of computerized decision support systems linked to electronic health records: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lorenzo Moja; Koren H Kwag; Theodore Lytras; Lorenzo Bertizzolo; Linn Brandt; Valentina Pecoraro; Giulio Rigon; Alberto Vaona; Francesca Ruggiero; Massimo Mangia; Alfonso Iorio; Ilkka Kunnamo; Stefanos Bonovas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  A simple reminder system improves venous thromboembolism prophylaxis rates and reduces thrombotic events for hospitalized patients1.

Authors:  J D Mitchell; J F Collen; S Petteys; A B Holley
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Electronic alerts to prevent venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients.

Authors:  Nils Kucher; Sophia Koo; Rene Quiroz; Joshua M Cooper; Marilyn D Paterno; Boris Soukonnikov; Samuel Z Goldhaber
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-03-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized medical and surgical patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; David R Morrison; Jacqueline M Cohen; Jessica Emed; Vicky Tagalakis; Andre Roussin; William Geerts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-07-16

6.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Implementing antibiotic practice guidelines through computer-assisted decision support: clinical and financial outcomes.

Authors:  S L Pestotnik; D C Classen; R S Evans; J P Burke
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1996-05-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Effectiveness of a novel and scalable clinical decision support intervention to improve venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: a quasi-experimental study.

Authors:  Craig A Umscheid; Asaf Hanish; Jesse Chittams; Mark G Weiner; Todd E H Hecht
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 2.796

Review 9.  Practices to prevent venous thromboembolism: a brief review.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-05-24       Impact factor: 7.035

10.  A clinical decision support system for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis at a general hospital in a middle-income country.

Authors:  Fernanda Fuzinatto; Fernando Starosta de Waldemar; André Wajner; Cesar Al Alam Elias; Juliana Fernándes Fernandez; João Luiz de Souza Hopf; Sergio Saldanha Menna Barreto
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.624

View more
  12 in total

1.  Association of the Risk of a Venous Thromboembolic Event in Emergency vs Elective General Surgery.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Kali M Kuhlenschmidt; John C Kubasiak; Lindsey E Mossler; Luis R Taveras; Thomas H Shoultz; Herbert A Phelan; Caroline E Reinke; Michael W Cripps
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

2.  Electronic health record risk-stratification tool reduces venous thromboembolism events in surgical patients.

Authors:  Radhika Rastogi; Courtney M Lattimore; J Hunter Mehaffey; Florence E Turrentine; Hillary S Maitland; Victor M Zaydfudim
Journal:  Surg Open Sci       Date:  2022-04-26

3.  Internal Validation of a Risk Scoring System for Venous Thromboembolism After Total hip or Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Akihiko Akamine; Naonobu Takahira; Masayuki Kuroiwa; Atsushi Tomizawa; Koichiro Atsuda
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.512

4.  Special Commentary: Using Clinical Decision Support Systems to Bring Predictive Models to the Glaucoma Clinic.

Authors:  Brian C Stagg; Joshua D Stein; Felipe A Medeiros; Barbara Wirostko; Alan Crandall; M Elizabeth Hartnett; Mollie Cummins; Alan Morris; Rachel Hess; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  Ophthalmol Glaucoma       Date:  2020-08-15

Review 5.  Interventions for implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalized patients at risk for venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; David R Morrison; Gisèle Diendéré; Alexandre Piché; Kristian B Filion; Adi J Klil-Drori; James D Douketis; Jessica Emed; André Roussin; Vicky Tagalakis; Martin Morris; William Geerts
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-24

6.  What hinders the uptake of computerized decision support systems in hospitals? A qualitative study and framework for implementation.

Authors:  Elisa G Liberati; Francesca Ruggiero; Laura Galuppo; Mara Gorli; Marien González-Lorenzo; Marco Maraldi; Pietro Ruggieri; Hernan Polo Friz; Giuseppe Scaratti; Koren H Kwag; Roberto Vespignani; Lorenzo Moja
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Effectiveness of interventions for the implementation of thromboprophylaxis in hospitalised patients at risk of venous thromboembolism: an updated abridged Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Gisele Diendéré; David R Morrison; Alexandre Piché; Kristian B Filion; Adi J Klil-Drori; James Douketis; Jessica Emed; André Roussin; Vicky Tagalakis; Martin Morris; William Geerts
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Risk stratification for SARS-CoV-2-related venous thromboembolic events: time for a new paradigm?

Authors:  S D Marshall; L V Duggan
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2021-11-05       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 9.  Venous Thromboembolism Risk Score and Pregnancy.

Authors:  Tiphaine Raia-Barjat; Osasere Edebiri; Céline Chauleur
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-11

10.  Clinical risk assessment model to predict venous thromboembolism risk after immobilization for lower-limb trauma.

Authors:  Banne Nemeth; Delphine Douillet; Saskia le Cessie; Andrea Penaloza; Thomas Moumneh; Pierre-Marie Roy; Suzanne Cannegieter
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-02-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.